Microsoft Spokesman Says ODF "Clearly Won" Standard War 289
Elektroschock writes "At a Red Hat retrospective panel on the ODF vs. OOXML struggle panel, a Microsoft representative, Stuart McKee, admitted that ODF had 'clearly won.' The Redmond company is going to add native support of ODF 1.1 with its Office 2007 service pack 2. Its yet unpublished format ISO OOXML will not be supported before the release of the next Office generation. Whether or not OOXML ever gets published is an open question after four national bodies appealed the ISO decision."
Re:Consumer vs Professional (Score:4, Informative)
Re:The end of vendor lock-in for Microsoft? (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.betanews.com/article/Next_Office_2007_service_pack_will_include_ODF_PDF_support_options/1211343807 [betanews.com]
There will be an option in both the installer and options menu to choose ODF as the default format, if you want.
I was in this session... (Score:5, Informative)
And in fact asked the question "Is this just Microsoft doing the first stage of embrace, extend, extinguish?" I was not happy with his response. He floated the idea of merging the two standards, which really concerns me, and also seemed to acknowledge that there was going to be some extension.
From the impression I got, we got thrown a bone, and ODF and OOXML are going to be merged in the next couple of years, and MS will have de facto control because OOXML allows for proprietary extensions.
MS is not going to take this lying down.
I did shake Stuart's hand afterwards, however. He deserves props for showing up and taking a little abuse, although I was not near as hard on him as I would have liked to be, just because other people also deserved a chance to ask questions.
One thing that struck me is that one of the Singapore standards guys was there, and he was NOT happy. He was pretty pissed off that they could not provide even one reference implementation.
But... like I said. Props for showing up, MS. Now you just have many years of monopolistic behavior to live down, and I'll never trust anything you say again.
Re:Consumer vs Professional (Score:3, Informative)
They didn't have an excuse at the time, either, which is why the courts convicted them of antitrust abuse for doing it.
Re:ODF Compatibility test utility (Score:5, Informative)
How to Stop Extend Embrace Extingish ? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:I was in this session... (Score:2, Informative)
Having said that, I think it would be great if they contributed to future versions of ODF, as long as they aren't the only voice being heard.
Re:The end of vendor lock-in for Microsoft? (Score:5, Informative)
The keystrokes for common actions used to be short, and for infrequent actions used to be longer -- a standard UI design principle. But in Word 2007?
"Edit | Paste Special" used to be "<alt>ES"; now it's "<alt>HVS" ("V"??? Where did that come from?). "Edit | Find" used to be "<alt>EF", now it's <alt>FDF. "File | Properties" used to be "<alt>FI", now (for all but a couple that I don't use) it's "<alt>FEP"[click "document properties"][click "advanced properties..."]. I can't find any way to get there without the mouse, and I can't find any way to get rid of the properties ribbon without using the mouse, and I don't see the point of needing the two mouse clicks because "advanced properties..." is the only entry under "document properties".
On the other hand, changing the number of columns (which I would always do in a new document template, maybe once every couple of years) is just "<alt>PJ" -- really convenient.
The whole interface is geared to the beginner, who is mousing all over the place. Power users, who usually like to keep their hands on the keyboard, have been abandoned.
Re:Consumer vs Professional (Score:3, Informative)
Re:How to Stop Extend Embrace Extingish ? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Wish i could see what you see.. (Score:2, Informative)
Any suggestions that don't involve "use MS Office" would be great.