The Beginnings of a TLD Free-For-All? 489
Mordok-DestroyerOfWo writes "According to the BBC, ICANN is considering opening up the wholesale creation of TLDs by private industry. While I'm sure this is done for the convenience of the companies and has nothing to do with the several thousand dollars they will be charging for each registration, I was curious what the tech community at large thought about this idea. It seems to me that this will simply open the doors for a never-ending stream of TLD squatters."
Sweet (Score:5, Funny)
Now I can finally realize my dream and create the ".isgay" TLD.
3rd post & (Score:5, Funny)
what is wrong with you people?!
I cannot wait... (Score:5, Funny)
http://first.post
Re:ICANN should make domains more expensive (Score:3, Funny)
Assuming how much money they spend remains the same and that domains are roughly $10 to register (+ or -), instead of registering thousands, they will registers fourties.
Layne
Wait - I've got a MUCH better idea... (Score:4, Funny)
I've had it with this hugely confusing system of names and TLDs, so here's my proposal:
We drop DNS completely and establish a completely numerical system of finding things on the internet. Each machine will just get a simple number. No more wondering what everything is called - just type in the number and presto - you're there! No fighting, no trademarks, no registrations, just "Here's your number pal, have fun."
Should work fine - right?
Re:Sweet (Score:5, Funny)
Dibs on .slashdot
Re:first penis (Score:1, Funny)
yet, .8==D wouldn't be a troll...
Top Level Domain (Score:2, Funny)
Come-on people lets use the full words at least once and not just jump into acranyms. "New for nerds" Not all nerds work on networking at that level. They may know what a Top Level Domain is however they don't work with them in a way where they use the Acranym "TLD". IHASMTBDTISTSHUTA
Re:Sweet (Score:3, Funny)
God DAMMIT!! You fucking squatter POS!
So Ummmmmm...... I'll give you $50 bucks for it. $100? $200? Come on!
Seriously name your price :)
Re:DNS has failed anyway (Score:2, Funny)
Hey, I don't know about you but I'm find just memorizing IP addresses.
Re:Sweet (Score:5, Funny)
Now I feel stupid (Score:3, Funny)
Re:first penis (Score:3, Funny)
Eight equals D?
I thought D equaled 13...
Re:Spammers, etc. will LOVE this (Score:5, Funny)
I thought the obvious TLD for phishers was .con
Re:Sweet (Score:3, Funny)
.thatswhatshesaid
Comment removed (Score:3, Funny)
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Wait - I've got a MUCH better idea... (Score:5, Funny)
Of course, maybe I'm giving the moderators too much credit. After all, why was your post modded troll? On second thought, maybe the moderators are smoking something today.
Re:Worst idea ever (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Sweet (Score:5, Funny)
I fervently pray for your dream to come to true. I really do.
So umm, do you need a captain of the guard in your royal court? Would he get to mess around with the jester too?
Just askin'.
Any applications to fill out? Hello?
Re:Sweet (Score:3, Funny)
The problem with your ".isgay" TLD is that it can go both ways, just like Captain Jack. (Yes, pun intended - it was way too easy.)
Either way, there's profit...
To some, having a "myname".isgay would be horrible, and they would pay to have it removed or to take ownership from it and make it look like it isn't real.
To others (e.g. Captain Jack) it would be a badge of honour and thus subject to the same domain-squatting issues as other "desirable" domain names.
Either way, you'll be rich. Good luck!
Re:Sweet (Score:1, Funny)
And, to torture your enemies, you can force them to sit through his "Developers, developers!" speech
Re:Sweet (Score:5, Funny)
You know, I am really tired of silly, childish, and unrealistic posts by immature child-like idiots on /.
Fortunately, this isn't one of them. I for one, welcome you, my consumer-rage TLD overlord.
Make sure you give him the little stick with bells and a tiny Ballmer-puppet head.
Re:Sweet (Score:1, Funny)
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=puns [thebestpag...iverse.net]
Re:DIBS!!!! round 2 (Score:5, Funny)
wtf.FTW!
Re:Sweet (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Sweet (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Sweet (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Worst idea ever (Score:5, Funny)
I think it'd actually be fitting for phishing sites to be using .con.
Re:3rd post & (Score:1, Funny)
I'm an Australian - you can have .XXXX for nothing, take it, please!!
Re:Worst idea ever (Score:3, Funny)
"With a name like Painful Rectal Itch, it has to be good."
--Saturday Night Live skit, late 1970s(?)
I bet Smuckers thought that was just HILARIOUS.
Re:Worst idea ever (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Bad Idea....Bad Bad Bad (Score:5, Funny)
I expect Commander Taco to register http://slashdot.dot/ [slashdot.dot] immediately upon its availability.
Re:Sweet (Score:5, Funny)
Even better, I'm going to register .corn Imagine going to google.corn! In some fonts it looks like google.com. Even better www.somebank.corn!!! Yeah! I'll be rich!
Re:DNS has failed anyway (Score:3, Funny)
I don't know! WAAAAAAARGGHHH!
Re:Worst idea ever (Score:5, Funny)
I would suspect .con would see some value for typosquatters as well.
But, at least that TLD would be an accurate description...
Re:Worst idea ever (Score:5, Funny)
Moving away from that original intent, it's become ingrained in most casual user's minds that this is the obligatory suffix of a typical web address. .net and .org are only sightly as recognizable as additional suffixes.
Exactly. That's why I always visit slashdot.com, I know it's the real Slashdot. That .org site is an obvious scam, filled with pointless 'news' links and inane comments.
Re:More TLD's Then (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Sweet (Score:1, Funny)
You mean:
Your ideas intrigue me. I would like to subscribe to your mailing list.
Re:first penis (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Sweet (Score:3, Funny)