SCOTUS To Hear Small ISPs' Case Against AT&T 80
snydeq writes "The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear an antitrust case that alleges AT&T squeezed out small ISPs by charging too much for wholesale access to its phone network. The case, originally brought to US District Court in 2003, had been appealed to the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. But AT&T requested the case be heard by the Supreme Court on the grounds that prior conflicting appeals court decisions in this area should be resolved at that level. As part of the case, the Supreme Court will likely also ascertain whether AT&T could be held to violate antitrust law without setting its retail prices below its own cost."
Place Yer Bets (Score:3, Funny)
... what, no takers?
Squeezed out? (Score:3, Funny)
Where I'm from that would be most unpleasant, not mention unsanitary!!
Hail Ye SCOTUS (Score:5, Funny)
Swift to save
habeas corpus,
ISP codpiece, and:
Burma Shave
Re:SCOUTS? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Two words (Score:4, Funny)
The small ISPs were the ones that were allowing terrorists to upload child pornography via spam and phishing messages. I think that should be enough to get them shut down now.
Re:SCOUTS? (Score:2, Funny)
-- Bill Gates
SCROTUS (Score:4, Funny)
I misread it as a porn-related article.
Props to Colbert for explaining it all (Score:3, Funny)