What Do You Want On Future Browsers? 628
Coach Wei writes "An industry wishlist for future browsers has been collected and developed by OpenAjax Alliance. Using wiki as an open collaboration tool, the feature list now lists 37 separate feature requests, covering a wide range of technology areas, such as security, Comet, multimedia, CSS, interactivity, and performance. The goal is to inform the browser vendors about what the Ajax developer community feels are most important for the next round of browsers (i.e., FF4, IE9, Safari4, and Opera10) and to provide supplemental details relative to the feature requests. Currently, the top three voted features are:
2D Drawing/Vector Graphics, The Two HTTP Connection Limit Issue, and HTML DOM Operation Performance In General . OpenAjax Alliance is calling for everyone to vote for his/her favorite features. The alliance also strongly encourages people to comment on the wiki pages for each of the existing features and to add any important new features that are not yet on the list."
On a related note, an anonymous reader writes "The Tao of Mac has put up pretty interesting list of five things that are still wrong with browsers these days, and I have to wonder — with things like AIR starting to be accepted by developers, do we still need the browser at all?"
Personally I want... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Personally I want... (Score:4, Funny)
Force feedback (Score:5, Funny)
Teledildonics. Mmm.
Re:Personally I want... (Score:5, Funny)
Why only 2D Vectors? (Score:5, Funny)
Give me 3D vector graphics, and let me play Battlezone in the browser!
FF3 (Score:5, Funny)
Slashdot effect (Score:2, Funny)
First of all, I want them to fix the Slashdot effect so I can read about the other probems.....
Re:I want what most users want. (Score:5, Funny)
You'll be wanting Lynx, my friend.
Re:Fast and clean (Score:5, Funny)
"Fast and clean"
Guess what ideal webbrowser and ideal hookers have in common.
Modular design (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Force feedback (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Personally I want... (Score:1, Funny)
Ninja SHARKS... with lasers on their heads.
Re:Force feedback (Score:4, Funny)
Pffft! Real men don't need Lynx. (Score:3, Funny)
$ telnet www.google.com 80
nuff said.
Re:Fast and clean (Score:2, Funny)
Re:stability? (Score:5, Funny)
Wow I didn't.
*click*
*click*
*click*
*click**click**click**click**click**click**click**click**click**click*
Mmmmmmm. I need a moment...alone...
Re:I want what most users want. (Score:5, Funny)
Have you considered Emacs?
A porn button (Score:3, Funny)
It would save a lot of time.
Re:Personally I want... (Score:2, Funny)
i would like to have porn with sex ninjas and frickin' laser beams!!!1
... and sharks in the middle of this, I suppose ?
Re:Personally I want... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:stability? (Score:1, Funny)
3 Kitchen sink add ons (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Personally I want... (Score:4, Funny)
Word of warning: I've seen it, and it ain't pretty.
Re:Feeping creaturitis (Score:3, Funny)
This could be a great start to the modular vs. monolithic kernel debate! Where is Tannenbaum when you need him :(
Re:Feeping creaturitis (Score:2, Funny)
Have you tried Lynx?
Re:Not just support for SVG, but mixed SVG/XHTML (Score:2, Funny)
However, it's possible that they will end up providing some more graceful degradation of the content, in which case users might start seeing messages like, "Sorry, this page doesn't display in Internet Explorer 10, because Internet Explorer 10 doesn't support SVG. Please use an SVG-enabled browser, such as Firefox, Safari, Opera, Konqueror, or Galeon."
I think I'd go into full cardiac arrest if I ever saw that error message from IE.