Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Internet Government The Courts News

Why ISPs' "Stand" Against Child Porn Is Actually Not a Stand Against Child Porn 283

TechDirt has an insightful article on the recent push for ISPs to turn off Usenet access under the guise of fighting child pornography. Unfortunately, the "stand against child porn" isn't actually a stand at all, it seems — more like ignoring the issue while trying to snag some headlines and good will. "Taking a stand against child porn wouldn't be overly aggressively blocking access to internet destinations that may or may not have porn (and there's no review over the list to make sure that they're actually objectionable). Taking a stand against child porn would be hunting down those responsible for the child porn and making sure that they're dealt with appropriately... Also, this sets an awful precedent in that the ISPs can point out that it's ok for them to block "objectionable" content where they get to define what's objectionable without any review."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Why ISPs' "Stand" Against Child Porn Is Actually Not a Stand Against Child Porn

Comments Filter:

An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says 'Beam me up, Scotty'.

Working...