Scientists Closer To Invisibility Cloak 308
Aviran was one of many readers to submit news of a just-announced development in the ongoing quest to develop a working invisibility cloak, writing: "Scientists say they are a step closer to developing materials that could render people and objects invisible. Researchers have demonstrated for the first time they were able to cloak three-dimensional objects using artificially engineered materials that redirect light around the objects. Previously, they only have been able to cloak very thin two-dimensional objects" Reader bensafrickingenius adds a link to coverage at the Times Online, and notes that "the world's two leading scientific journals, Science and Nature, are expected to report the results this week." Tjeerd adds a link to a Reuters' story carried by Scientific American.
War Application (Score:4, Interesting)
enage cloaking device (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:enage cloaking device (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:enage cloaking device (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:MIT (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:War Application (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:enage cloaking device (Score:3, Interesting)
First we need to rembeer that light, infra-red, ultra violet and radar (among others) are just different wavelengths of electromagnetic waves. So the prisiple is the same but one "cloack" technology may be effective for some wavelengts but not others.
I'm just going to call it all emw for now.
To be invisible one need to take care of four things.
1. Not reflecting any emw from any emw-source to the sensor/observer.
2. Not to emit any emw to the sensor/observer
3. Not create a shadow in the emw emitded by the backgroud against the sensor/observer
4. Not create a shadow in the emw emitded towards a surface in a way changing the emw the surface reflects/emits towards the sensor/observer
So to ansver your question to be efective against infra-red cameras the technology must be effective guiding emw around in the infrared spectrum and one must somehow hide ones own infrared signature
Re:War Application (Score:2, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
Science (Score:3, Interesting)
Raw science should not be bound by vague concepts of potential unethical use of discoveries.
If we followed that idea we would ( at best ) still be sitting in a dark cold gloomy cave. Wondering if we get to eat tonight, or be eaten instead.