Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Military Technology Science

Scientists Closer To Invisibility Cloak 308

Aviran was one of many readers to submit news of a just-announced development in the ongoing quest to develop a working invisibility cloak, writing: "Scientists say they are a step closer to developing materials that could render people and objects invisible. Researchers have demonstrated for the first time they were able to cloak three-dimensional objects using artificially engineered materials that redirect light around the objects. Previously, they only have been able to cloak very thin two-dimensional objects" Reader bensafrickingenius adds a link to coverage at the Times Online, and notes that "the world's two leading scientific journals, Science and Nature, are expected to report the results this week." Tjeerd adds a link to a Reuters' story carried by Scientific American.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Scientists Closer To Invisibility Cloak

Comments Filter:
  • War Application (Score:4, Interesting)

    by s31523 ( 926314 ) on Monday August 11, 2008 @09:54AM (#24555005)
    An obvious use will be from a military aspect. I wonder about how this technology will be received by various insurgents in our numerous war campaigns. Imagine a small troop deployment vanishing and reappearing in front of a goat-herder turned freedom fighter. I don't know if he would cut-n-run or stand fast to fight the "demons"...
  • by dellcom ( 1213558 ) on Monday August 11, 2008 @09:56AM (#24555029)
    "His cloak is perfect... no tachyon emissions, no residual antiprotons." on a serious note, would this not be vulnerable to infra-red cameras?
  • by daveatneowindotnet ( 1309197 ) on Monday August 11, 2008 @10:10AM (#24555181)
    Considering TFA says they are bending light to achieve this, I don't see why infrared light would not be effected the same a visual light. What I find to be really interesting is what this could allow us to do with non-visual light (microwaves, radio, etc.)
  • by dellcom ( 1213558 ) on Monday August 11, 2008 @10:16AM (#24555263)
    If the material is 'bending the light' around the object then the IR would be bent with it, however if the object the material is covering is generating heat, then the cloak material would absorb that heat and emit it as IR radiation. From what the article says I do not see how it can cloak that.
  • Re:MIT (Score:2, Interesting)

    by T3Tech ( 1306739 ) <tj&t3technet,com> on Monday August 11, 2008 @10:22AM (#24555333) Homepage
    I seem to recall seeing something as well. Though I've long figured that in certain applications the use of fiber optics could do a pretty good job of making something at least really, really hard to see that it was there.
  • Re:War Application (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Swizec ( 978239 ) on Monday August 11, 2008 @10:25AM (#24555367) Homepage
    Depending on what wavelengths of light it works on you could still see out with IR goggles or some other fancy gizmo like perhaps radar.
  • by KenRH ( 265139 ) on Monday August 11, 2008 @10:25AM (#24555375)

    would this not be vulnerable to infra-red cameras?

    First we need to rembeer that light, infra-red, ultra violet and radar (among others) are just different wavelengths of electromagnetic waves. So the prisiple is the same but one "cloack" technology may be effective for some wavelengts but not others.

    I'm just going to call it all emw for now.

    To be invisible one need to take care of four things.

    1. Not reflecting any emw from any emw-source to the sensor/observer.
    2. Not to emit any emw to the sensor/observer
    3. Not create a shadow in the emw emitded by the backgroud against the sensor/observer
    4. Not create a shadow in the emw emitded towards a surface in a way changing the emw the surface reflects/emits towards the sensor/observer

    So to ansver your question to be efective against infra-red cameras the technology must be effective guiding emw around in the infrared spectrum and one must somehow hide ones own infrared signature

  • Re:War Application (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Redfeather ( 1033680 ) on Monday August 11, 2008 @10:59AM (#24555873) Homepage
    Funny, I went to architecture as well - but non-military. Imagine an architect's delight when he can suddenly make completely invisible all kinds of inaccessible, support-bearing structures. Floating houses, anyone? Shore up the leaning tower permanently?
  • Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Monday August 11, 2008 @11:12AM (#24556021)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Monday August 11, 2008 @02:02PM (#24558223)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Science (Score:3, Interesting)

    by nurb432 ( 527695 ) on Monday August 11, 2008 @05:39PM (#24560723) Homepage Journal

    Raw science should not be bound by vague concepts of potential unethical use of discoveries.

    If we followed that idea we would ( at best ) still be sitting in a dark cold gloomy cave. Wondering if we get to eat tonight, or be eaten instead.

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...