Mozilla Demanding Firefox Display EULA In Ubuntu 785
TRS-80 writes "Users of the upcoming Ubuntu release, Intrepid Ibex, are being confronted with an EULA the first time they launch Firefox. Mark Shuttleworth says 'Mozilla Corp asked that this be added in order for us to continue to call the browser Firefox... I would not consider an EULA as a best practice. It's unfortunate that Mozilla feels this is absolutely necessary' and notes there's an unbranded 'abrowser' package available. Many of the comments say Ubuntu should ditch Firefox as this makes it clear it's not Free Software, hence unsuitable for Ubuntu main, and just ship Iceweasel or Epiphany, the GNOME browser." A few comments take Canonical to task for agreeing to Mozilla's demand to display an EULA without consulting the community.
What's the big deal? (Score:5, Funny)
Blindly clicking through meaningless and offensive EULAs is standard practice in the Windows world.
Next step for Mozilla Corp.. (Score:5, Funny)
...is to provide a "genuine firefox advantage" feature, that will check if your Firefox (tm) installation is genuine, and show a nasty transparent box in the corner of the screen...
Re:What's the big deal? (Score:2, Funny)
We should include EULAs for every single piece of software that's distributed with Ubuntu. On the first boot after the install the user can be confronted with a few thousand click through EULAs! Or perhaps it would be even better to follow Mozilla's example and have the EULA prompt when the user tries to launch the program for the first time!
You are launching 'ls' for the first time. Before you use 'ls' you must read and agree to the following EULA...
An application is trying to access the 'printf' function of libc. Before continuing you must read and agree to the following EULA...
Re:first post (Score:5, Funny)
eat my ass you homos
You're requesting a bunch of males intimately interact with your ass. Everybody else is the 'homo'?
Re:Fair enough (Score:5, Funny)
You have just launched /bin/bash
EULA - blah blah blah.... ...
Agree Y/N: Y
user@host: ~/ $ ls /bin/ls
You have just ran
EULA - blah blah blah.... ... ..
Agree Y/N: Y
.
Desktop
Pictures
Downloads
user@host: ~ $ cd Pictures /bin/cd
You have just ran
EULA - blah blah blah.... ...
Agree Y/N: Y
user@host: ~/Pictures $
Wow I can't wait!!!
Re:What's the big deal? (Score:5, Funny)
..and +1 Funny and +1 Interesting and -1 Redundant and...
Sorry, couldn't stop clicking.
/recovering Windows user
//+1 slashie
Fewer idiots using Linux (Score:5, Funny)
You mean back to the good old days when the kernel could barely self-host and you had to bit edit to get things to boot off a IDE hard drive?
Ah, those were the days.
Re:Making Ubuntu Accessible? (Score:3, Funny)
Easy for you to say. You live in Burger King.
Once isn't enough - I want it every 5 minutes (Score:5, Funny)
Only showing an EULA once is ridiculous.
1) As many have pointed out, most people will 'click-through' the 1st time they see a license, not reading it at all. Showing the license multiple times, maybe each startup, or maybe every 5 minutes, helps to ensure that users know their obligations as users, and don't infringe on Mozilla's God-given trademark.
2) What happens on internet Kiosks, libraries, schools, etc? You can't only show the EULA once, as the sys admin will be the only one to know of their obligations, and none of the real users will know.
3) With so much pop-up advertising in web CONTENT, is it really too much to ask for our web browser to start demanding some recognition as well?
I KNOW SOME PEOPLE ARE ALSO PISSED OFF AT MOZILLA'S USE OF ALL-CAPS IN THEIR LICENSE, BUT HONESTLY, WHAT'S WRONG WITH THAT IF IT SLOWS DOWN READING A BIT AND MAKES IT LOOK LIKE YOU'RE REALLY FUCKING SERIOUS ABOUT YOUR EULA, AS MOZILLA CLEARLY ARE?
I therefore argue for an EULA popup every 5 minutes.
Of course I myself will no longer be using Firefox. Back to konqueror I suppose. It would be good if someone would write some Gtk2 wrappers for webkit.
Re:Making Ubuntu Accessible? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Making Ubuntu Accessible? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Making Ubuntu Accessible? (Score:2, Funny)
If anything, I would like to see Linux marketing towards the unwashed masses decline. Fewer idiots using Linux means less dumbing down, less time spent by the developers explaining basic usage, and more time actually improving the product. The end result then becomes better for those who don't need their hand held.
I agree. More software ought to follow in the footsteps of KDE 4.0. This way developers could develop for the sake of developing software. And, because they wouldn't have to worry about things like users actually using their products, they wouldn't have so many of those annoying bug reports.
Re:Making Ubuntu Accessible? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Making Ubuntu Accessible? (Score:3, Funny)
Ahh. Everyday is a McSoylent day.
Re:Making Ubuntu Accessible? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Fewer idiots using Linux (Score:3, Funny)