Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Internet IT

Repair Crews Reach Vicinity of Damaged Cables In Mediterranean 145

GWMAW writes "A robotic submarine searched beneath the Mediterranean on Sunday for damaged communications cables, two days after Web and telephone access was knocked out for much of the Middle East. Telecommunication providers from Cairo to Dubai continued Sunday to scramble to reroute voice and data traffic through potentially costly detours in Asia and North America after the lines running under the Mediterranean Sea were damaged Friday." According to the article, "Once found, the cable ends will be pulled to the surface and repaired on deck — a process that could take several days."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Repair Crews Reach Vicinity of Damaged Cables In Mediterranean

Comments Filter:
  • by pipboy9999 ( 1088005 ) on Tuesday December 23, 2008 @02:04PM (#26213755)

    How do they repair the cables? Especially with glass fibre I wouldn't know what to do.

    My assumption would be that there are points built into the cable where you can exchange out bad segments for new segments.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 23, 2008 @02:06PM (#26213771)

    http://www.laser2000.co.uk/fusion_splicers.php?area=262

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 23, 2008 @02:06PM (#26213775)

    How do they repair the cables? Especially with glass fibre I wouldn't know what to do.

    http://www.francetelecom.com/sirius/dossiers_anim/cables_sous_marins/index_en.html

  • by AngelCeleste ( 1035358 ) on Tuesday December 23, 2008 @02:07PM (#26213787)

    fiber splicers - its mostly done in the field because in house we have handy-dandy prespliced fiber cables of different lengths. If you see (fill in local ILEC) out repairing a cut cable, chances are they might be splicing.

  • by onkelonkel ( 560274 ) on Tuesday December 23, 2008 @02:15PM (#26213865)
    You had it right. OTDR.

    Optical Time Domain Reflectometer. You just ping the broken end and get a distance measurement.

  • by Octorian ( 14086 ) on Tuesday December 23, 2008 @02:16PM (#26213881) Homepage

    With a device known as an Optical Time Domain Reflectometer [wikipedia.org]. Supposedly they can not only detect cable length, breaks, but even the location of splices.

  • by rickb928 ( 945187 ) on Tuesday December 23, 2008 @02:18PM (#26213911) Homepage Journal

    The actual fiber repair is done pretty much as it would be done for terrestrial cables. Either a fusion splice, usually by re-cleaving the ends for a clean surface and vibrating the ends ultrasonically to heat by friction and weld them together, or a very small splicing kit that holds the ends in near-perfect alignment, usually filled with a gel of identical optical properties to reduce the loss and refraction. Since space is an issue, I suspect fusion splices are the only acceptable option.

    The biggest problem is both accomodating the repairs to the fiber jackets, and then re-sealing the cable. I wouldn't be suprised that there are fairly standard splice boxes that solve this.

    Replacing segments doesn't seem like a good option. Any useful segment should measure miles in length, which is pretty expensive. Even replacing a segment and hauling the old one in for repair sounds like more trouble than it's worth. Of course, repairs on the open sea sound like fun to me. I had enough trouble sitting at a little worktable in a dim cable room with equipment balanced here and there, and testing going on constantly. A nice 20-30 foot sea would make me want to apply at the local McDonald's. Life is too short.

    But nice work if you can do it.

  • by MBGMorden ( 803437 ) on Tuesday December 23, 2008 @02:22PM (#26213979)

    Luckily you can have both in one :)

    http://duckproducts.com/products/detail.asp?catid=1&subid=1&plid=3 [duckproducts.com]

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 23, 2008 @02:24PM (#26214007)

    How do they repair the cables? Especially with glass fibre I wouldn't know what to do.

    They drag the cable up and cut it (assuming it is not already in two pieces). They strip back the armor and sheath on both pieces. They then splice in a new piece of cable using a fusion splicer, which basically lines up each individual fiber (quite a time-consuming process to clean and prep each piece) and then the fusion splicer essentially melts the fiber strand back together. They put heat-shrink and something like a splint to keep it from bending over the spliced area and then fit each splice into a tray. The trays are then mounted into a splice case. Submarine cables are much more difficult because it has to be well sealed and able to withstand significant pressure.

    The faults are located using an OTDR (Optical Time Delay Reflectometry), which basically sends light down the fiber and measures the reflections. As we know the speed of light we can accurately measure the distance to a break, imperfections, etc of the cable and splices.

  • by aphexer ( 1110553 ) on Tuesday December 23, 2008 @02:30PM (#26214073)

    They cut the cable in half, and put a new piece in it. They can locate the exact point of failure using an OTDR, as already mentioned in other comments by now.

    In one such big under-sea cable, there could be hundreds of individual fibers inside. (It doesn't cost alot more to put another fibre in the big cable, and you get alot more bandwidth to sell).

    For each fiber inside the cable they "weld" it to the new piece they are putting between. (I'm sorry, I don't have the correct translation for the word in English). But really, they put the fiber in a machine, together with the fiber of the new cable they are putting in between, and they hit a button: "weld". It creates an arc through the point where the fiber needs to be welded together. After the arcing you heat that spot so the atomic structure can repair a little.

    Repeat 500 times and put some extra mechanical protection around to protect your welding, and you're done.

    There exists equipment that can do multiple fibers at once, so basically the engineer who's doing it just needs to place both ends of the fibers in the machine, hit the button, remove fiber and repeat for a day or 2.

  • by AdamHaun ( 43173 ) on Tuesday December 23, 2008 @02:40PM (#26214183) Journal

    Actually, you can. You use a device called a Time Domain Reflectometer [wikipedia.org], which sends a pulse down the line and times how long it takes a reflection to come back.

    2 * Distance = Speed of light * Round trip time

    To find the location of the fault to within ten feet you need a timer with about a 20 nanosecond resolution, which equates to a 50 MHz counter -- not too difficult.

  • by camperdave ( 969942 ) on Tuesday December 23, 2008 @02:42PM (#26214223) Journal
    Gilligan didn't cut the cable, the Professor did. He made a saw out of Mrs Howell's diamonds to try to cut through the outer sheath of the cable. When that didn't work, he rigged a blow torch to burn/melt his way through to the wires. All Gilligan did was cover up the hole with tree sap when the storm hit again. He *SAVED* the cable.
  • Re:Satellites FTW? (Score:3, Informative)

    by hardburn ( 141468 ) <hardburn.wumpus-cave@net> on Tuesday December 23, 2008 @02:43PM (#26214245)

    Geosychronous orbit has too much time latency, and LEO takes more satellites to cover the same area. It'd be cheeper to just lay more cable, but corporations tend to push for raw efficiency rather than redundancy. It's going to take governments using their buying power to encourage redundant routes to get us back to where DARPA was in the '80s.

  • Re: Slack (Score:5, Informative)

    by Civil_Disobedient ( 261825 ) on Tuesday December 23, 2008 @02:45PM (#26214289)

    There was a terrific article written for Wired by Neal Stephenson (yes, that Neal Stephenson!) called Mother Earth Mother Board [wired.com] all about the laying of the longest underwater telephony cable in history. He goes into a lot of details as to how the cable is laid, what happens to the cable when it reaches shore, what is the cable made of, how does it work, etc.

    Here's an excerpt where he explains how slack affects the process:

    The basic problem of slack is akin to a famous question underlying the mathematical field of fractals: How long is the coastline of Great Britain? If I take a wall map of the isle and measure it with a ruler and multiply by the map's scale, I'll get one figure. If I do the same thing using a set of large-scale ordnance survey maps, I'll get a much higher figure because those maps will show zigs and zags in the coastline that are polished to straight lines on the wall map. But if I went all the way around the coast with a tape measure, I'd pick up even smaller variations and get an even larger number. If I did it with calipers, the number would be larger still. This process can be repeated more or less indefinitely, and so it is impossible to answer the original question straightforwardly. The length of the coastline of Great Britain must be defined in terms of fractal geometry.

    A cross-section of the seafloor has the same property. The route between the landing station at Songkhla, Thailand, and the one at Lan Tao Island, Hong Kong, might have a certain length when measured on a map, say 2,500 kilometers. But if you attach a 2,500-kilometer cable to Songkhla and, wearing a diving suit, begin manually unrolling it across the seafloor, you will run out of cable before you reach the public beach at Tong Fuk. The reason is that the cable follows the bumpy topography of the seafloor, which ends up being a longer distance than it would be if the seafloor were mirror-flat.

    Over long (intercontinental) distances, the difference averages out to about 1 percent, so you might need a 2,525-kilometer cable to go from Songkhla to Lan Tao. The extra 1 percent is slack, in the sense that if you grabbed the ends and pulled the cable infinitely tight (bar tight, as they say in the business), it would theoretically straighten out and you would have an extra 25 kilometers. This slack is ideally molded into the contour of the seafloor as tightly as a shadow, running straight and true along the surveyed course. As little slack as possible is employed, partly because cable costs a lot of money (for the FLAG cable, $16,000 to $28,000 per kilometer, depending on the amount of armoring) and partly because loose coils are just asking for trouble from trawlers and other hazards. In fact, there is so little slack (in the layperson's sense of the word) in a well-laid cable that it cannot be grappled and hauled to the surface without snapping it.

    This raises two questions, one simple and one nauseatingly difficult and complex. First, how does one repair a cable if it's too tight to haul up?

    The answer is that it must first be pulled slightly off the seafloor by a detrenching grapnel, which is a device, meant to be towed behind a ship, that rolls across the bottom of the ocean on two fat tractor tires. Centered between those tires is a stout, wicked-looking, C-shaped hook, curving forward at the bottom like a stinger. It carves its way through the muck and eventually gets under the cable and lifts it up and holds it steady just above the seafloor. At this point its tow rope is released and buoyed off.

    The ship now deploys another towed device called a cutter, which, seen from above, is shaped like a manta ray. On the top and bottom surfaces it carries V-shaped blades. As the ship makes another pass over the detrenching grapnel, one of these blades catches the cable and severs it.

    It is now possible to get hold of the cut ends, using other grapnels. A cable repair ship carries many d

  • by tabrisnet ( 722816 ) on Tuesday December 23, 2008 @02:55PM (#26214457)

    Actually, there are repeaters in line, albeit I don't remember the distances. There's a big copper conductor in the jacket (just one, the ground is the ocean itself) sending a couple hundred volts through it.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 23, 2008 @03:46PM (#26215185)

    Ok, I'll bite.

    Optical fiber cables are connected by first identifying each strand in the bundle, and the other cut end of that same strand. Matching strands are taken, one set at a time, into a fusion splicing machine. The fusion splicing machine aligns the strands, then heats the ends so the glass melts together.

    Older splicing machines required the person operating the machine to visually ensure the strands were aligned, and the heating was automatic. New machines perform computer-guided alignment and automatic heating. These machines commonly cost about as much as a nice new car (around $30-50 thousand U.S. dollars, IIRC) and require specialized training and supplies for regular, telephone-pole mounted cables. Undersea cables probably have extra special costs.

    In any case, a bundle with hundreds of strands takes days to repair. It can take several hours to splice a broken 36 strand cable.

    You can only get so many machines close enough to the broken cable, so the work does not allow for, say, 50 splicers to all work on it at once.

    Of course, I'm glossing over all the work it takes to pull a cable off the sea floor, get it on a ship, and then put it back. Someone else can gather karma for that info ;)

  • by lucifuge31337 ( 529072 ) <daryl@in t r o s p e c t . n et> on Tuesday December 23, 2008 @04:03PM (#26215395) Homepage

    how do you propose to power it?

    I'm not saying power couldn't be supplied, but I don't think it'd be cost effective, and you'd need to run a whole new set of lines.

    The same way the repeaters are already powered - the are power leads bundled with the fiber cable. In a full cut, they would have to repair the copper power leads anyway.

  • by SETY ( 46845 ) on Tuesday December 23, 2008 @05:53PM (#26216563)

    Fusion splices are the only acceptable option because you can't afford to have a 0.1 dB splice on a long fiber. Too much loss will upset your whole link budget and you will not get an acceptable SNR at the far end.

    BTW, I have never read how a fusion splicer works, but all the ones I have used align the fiber and look like they send a current between two metal contacts for ~0.2 seconds that fuse the fiber. I'm pretty sure ultrasound isn't used. When you are trying to align two fibers exactly, vibrating them doesn't sound like a good idea.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 23, 2008 @07:06PM (#26217365)

    This is not far from wrong actually. The superglue is optically identical in refraction index to the cable and the duct tape is a thermal shrink wrap designed to handle long term exposure to salt water. But that's essentially it. It take a long time to fix all those broken fibers.

     

THEGODDESSOFTHENETHASTWISTINGFINGERSANDHERVOICEISLIKEAJAVELININTHENIGHTDUDE

Working...