Campaign to Open Source IBM's Notes/Domino

Ian Tree, an IT consultant from the Netherlands, has started a campaign to convince IBM to open source the code for Notes/Domino. Hoping for results similar to the push for Sun to open source Solaris, which finally saw success in 2005, Tree makes the simple point that it won't happen until someone asks. "By being an open source product, Tree is also hoping that Domino becomes something schools use to teach groupware and application development concepts, which is the holy grail for future market adoption. This is how various Unixes, relational databases, Linux, and a raft of other products eventually became commercialized. While the idea of open sourcing any proprietary program is appealing, in as much as it sets a program free to live beyond the commitment (or lack thereof) of its originator, it is hard to see why open Notes/Domino would have any more impact than OpenSolaris."

Re:Please, No!

[Anonymous Coward]

Just for the record, Notes 8.5 ( in beta now, due out early in the New Year ) should be supported on Ubuntu with DEB as well as RPM installs

database vs mail

[faraday_cage]

As a former Notes Sys Administrator, it had its benefits, and its problems. The fact of the matter was that the email and scheduling part of it were never its strengths. The databases, and the applications that it built were by far superior groupware than anything I have seen. Oh to be able to replicate something like Access databases at the click of a button for users who do need to work on data offline. As an earlier commenter said, they got the database right. Everyone just assumed they 'tacked on' the email and calendar as an afterthought to facilitate workflow solutions. Notes Replication was simply the best (when it was configured properly). But having previously installed Notes clients and managed it, I can tell you that setup of the client was a breeze compared to setting up and configuring Exchange/Outlook. From an end user perspective, there were some things they got very right, and still as many they got wrong. But comparing it to Outlook (apart from the few scheduler limitations), it was far cleaner and quicker in so many ways.

Re:uh, no?

[Dan Ost]

Has it really failed? Don't companies still pay IBM lots of money to use it?

Re:uh, no?

[Hal_Porter]

Most of the original OS/2 was joint copyright with Microsoft and presumably covered by whatever license IBM and Microsoft agreed on. I remember seeing the copyright message as it booted and loaded the device driver I was working on.

Actually if Microsoft's licenses worked like the GPL it would apply to any code linked to it. So an incremental rewrite would not change the license.

Oh God NO! Not Lotus Notes again!

[zildgulf]

And, of course, Notes ran best on the OS/2 server platform. :)

I should know. I WAS a Lotus Notes admin/developer/E-mail admin until '03. Boy, did I pick the wrong horse! The malfunctioning Domino Web server, which would render only some of the Native Notes elements requiring me to create parallel HTML/XML code for every single database form, the bloated Web Mail Java Applets that refuse to download/upload, and a total mess of the Email/database system.

I still cringe when hearing references to programing in Lotus Notes. The native language to Lotus Notes is the Lotus Formula language, where no looping allowed and certain functions could not be put before others for no good reason (or unpredictable side effects will occur).

Then the dreaded DbLookup function. That one function alone caused so many intradatabase dependencies that I could not remove out-of-date documents in fear of causing problems in other seemly unrelated documents in bloated Databases.

Please, somebody kill Lotus Notes with FIRE!