Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Portables Technology Hardware

Next Generation T9 Keyboard Technology 150

Iddo Genuth writes "Cliff Kushler, the inventor of the T9 keyboard technology for numeric keypads, has developed a new alphanumeric entry technology for touch-screen laptops and Smartphone devices. This latest technology, named Swype, works with an on-screen QWERTY keyboard similar to ones found on Windows Mobile and the iPhone. The difference from the usual method of typing in the letters is that a finger or stylus is used to slide in the first letter, then without lifting the finger, the user continues writing the entire word. Only once the word is completed can the finger be lifted off. According to the developers, this leads to a much faster way of 'typing,' or as we might call it soon, 'swiping.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Next Generation T9 Keyboard Technology

Comments Filter:
  • Finally (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anthony_Cargile ( 1336739 ) on Tuesday December 30, 2008 @11:17PM (#26275783) Homepage
    Touchscreen keyboards to me have always been hard to use. On both the plasma-screen smartboards at my friend's A/V workplace and the ones I've seen in modern (i.e. well funded) high schools, the windows on screen keyboard and the keyboard prepackaged with the smartboard software is just terrible, partially due to the heat-sensitive surface being activated wherever my finger's heat first hits it, i.e. NOT where I wanted it to be.

    This looks much more promising, and will hopefully be preventing the smartboard users from running back to a physical keyboard just to type something after using the mouse in front of the actual screen.
  • Dvorak? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by XanC ( 644172 ) on Tuesday December 30, 2008 @11:18PM (#26275801)

    All these virtual keyboards are hard-coded for QWERTY, which makes even less sense for that kind of device than for a modern keyboard!

    Dvorak should be an option, along with alphabetical order.

    Actually for this thing, there's probably a whole new layout that's optimal. (That's an exercise for the reader to invent.)

  • Re:Dvorak? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by i.of.the.storm ( 907783 ) on Tuesday December 30, 2008 @11:39PM (#26276015) Homepage
    This might be the optimal layout: HexInput [strout.net]. Or at least, it's designed to work in a similar manner to what's described.
  • Dasher? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by unifyingtheory ( 1357069 ) on Wednesday December 31, 2008 @12:28AM (#26276361) Homepage
    Is this anything like Dasher? The demo can be seen here [youtube.com]
  • Re:Dvorak? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by AmberBlackCat ( 829689 ) on Wednesday December 31, 2008 @01:32AM (#26276837)
    Specifically concerning the iPhone, I think it would be better to use a regular telephone keypad instead of a whole QWERTY keyboard. There would be space for bigger keys. I'd have an easier time just pressing each number until I got the letter I wanted, rather than pressing the smaller QWERTY keys only to have the wrong letter typed. Combining T9 with the telephone keypad would make it even better.
  • Suretype (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 31, 2008 @03:29AM (#26277449)
    I'm surprised nobody has mentioned SureType- the system the BlackBerry Pearl uses. The keyboard is laid out in QWERTY style, but there are two letters per key. This allows for fewer possible words than a T9 per key-press and also allows for faster typing because of the high likelihood of tapping on the same key consecutively or alternating between the same sets of two or three keys. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Blackberrypearl.JPG [wikipedia.org] for a look at the layout.
  • Shark-like (Score:3, Interesting)

    by ozbon ( 99708 ) on Wednesday December 31, 2008 @05:44AM (#26277987) Homepage

    This looks like the Shark typing method [ibm.com] created for IBM a few years back.

    I really liked the Shark idea when it first came out, so it's good to see something similar again. (Plus Shark worked on non-QWERTY 'boards as well, you just changed the settings on its initialisation)

  • Re:bleh (Score:3, Interesting)

    by cp.tar ( 871488 ) <cp.tar.bz2@gmail.com> on Wednesday December 31, 2008 @07:06AM (#26278381) Journal

    If I understood the idea correctly, tracing paths between letters gives you a curve, or at least a broken line with points where individual letters should stand. That means that, with practice, you simply draw a curve describing the word you want to enter.

    Having started learning Chinese a few months ago, I'm beginning to wonder if we're re-inventing the wheel here...

  • Re:bleh (Score:2, Interesting)

    by heteromonomer ( 698504 ) on Wednesday December 31, 2008 @07:18AM (#26278449)

    I usually dislike people who don't use T9; they tend to be the idiots who write things like "l8r"

    You sir, are certainly a judgmental idiot. I agree with the GP. I have a poor opinion of T9, because it rarely ever gets the right word. I usually write specific messages that don't fit to the canned word guesses it has. Trying to use it often turns out to be more work than it saves, at least for me. And I don't write in leet or in the SMS lingo.

  • by Snart Barfunz ( 526615 ) on Wednesday December 31, 2008 @08:47AM (#26278881)

    As one of the many poor typists out there, I don't see why we still have to choose between looking at the keyboard and learning to touch type. A touch keyboard, detecting my finger positions, could coordinate with a translucent virtual kbd on screen that also displayed my finger positions. The virtual kbd would be made to appear and disappear with appropriate gestures. Addional feedback would include haptic, sound, & 'hover' keys. And, as the whole thing is virtual, it would reconfigure on the fly to cope with any language, which simplifies life for the PC manufacturer. The touch keyboard would still need some kind of display but it could be pretty basic. Oh dear - I hope I haven't described this in too much detail. I wouldn't want some poor patent troll to starve...

If you want to put yourself on the map, publish your own map.

Working...