The Flying Giant Is 40 Years Old 366
Ponca City, We love you writes "Four decades ago, Boeing's prototype 747 took to the skies over Washington State for a 75-minute flight that helped bring cheap airline travel to millions of people and would remain the world's largest commercial aircraft for 37 years until the advent of the double-decker Airbus A380. What made the 747 unique was that it was the first 'wide body' aircraft with more than one aisle — a big step towards reducing the sense of traveling in a narrow tube, and inducing a sense more equivalent to flying in a large room with high ceilings. But back in the 1960s, convincing people that the 747 would fly was a tough call. Joe Sutter, the director of engineering on the project, even spent an hour with Charles Lindbergh, going over all the data to prove that the jumbo would not flip over or become unstable at high speeds. Boeing has sold more than 1,400 jumbos in the past four decades, worth, at today's prices, more than $350 billion and although we might complain of traveling in 'cattle class' we have the 747 to thank for being able to do so at affordable prices."
Re:A whole hour! (Score:5, Funny)
It was a 1960's hour. You have to adjust for inflation and ADD in 2008, that's over a month in 2008 time.
Re:So little progress in aerospace. (Score:5, Funny)
Try finding a 1960s aircraft that is rated to fly for 208 minutes, or nearly 3 and a half hours, on one single engine. Thats how far the technology has come, its extremely reliable.
Well, there was this one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirit_of_st_louis [wikipedia.org]
It managed more than 33 hours, on a single engine, in 1927.
Now get off my cloud.
Re:Hindenburg is older (Score:2, Funny)
Burn!
Re:So little progress in aerospace. (Score:3, Funny)
the best example is that of 'ETOPS' (Extended Twin Engine Operational Performance Standard)
To me, the alternate joke acronym seems to describe the situation more succinctly: "Engines Turn Or Passengers Swim".
Re:747s have broken the sound barrier (Score:3, Funny)
"But this one goes to 11!"
Re:So little progress in aerospace. (Score:3, Funny)
Glad you liked it :)
Re:So little progress in aerospace. (Score:3, Funny)
That's an airplane designed to fly on a single engine.
The parent is referring to a multi-engine design that is capable of flying for extended periods of time on a single engine.
Also, he got the acronym wrong.
ETOPS: Engines Turn Or Passengers Swim