ICANN Responds To gTLD Plan Comments 119
angry tapir writes "ICANN has delayed its plans to sell new generic top-level domains while responding to public comments about the controversial proposal. The organization has released a 154-page document detailing and analyzing the hundreds of comments (PDF) it has received about its gTLD plan. In response to several concerns brought up by the public and companies in the Internet industry, ICANN has moved out the projected timeline for taking applications for new gTLDs from September to December."
This "plan" only benefits registrars (Score:5, Insightful)
Further balkanization of gTLD's does nothing for the end user. It will be a great stream of new revenue for registrars though.
ICANN has become nothing more than a pawn of domain registrars. Read the meeting minutes and see for yourself.
I'm for it! (Score:2, Insightful)
I, for one, am for it. At the very least it will derail the slimy domain squatters that just sit on every-damn-word-in-the-dictionary-and-combination-thereof.com|net|org
And I don't want to hear the shit about companies protecting their brand name. It is just about impossible to give your company a name that has not already been used *somewhere* and/or registered as a domain name.
- Sick of it all
Re:blarg i am anonymous (Score:4, Insightful)
But how much of that is squatters, anyway? I know I've had many times where I've gone to register an domain name and it's been taken, but when I go to the sites under that domain, I find placeholder pages with ads.
Re:blarg i am anonymous (Score:4, Insightful)
Damn the feedback, full speed ahead! (Score:3, Insightful)
I can't wait until some shady group in another country buys the
Thanks ICANN. I guess the assumption was right, you don't give a damn about feedback after all. As long as you can make a few more bucks on new registrar accreditations (whatever that will mean when you start selling new gTLDs) you're happy, right? And thats really all that matters on the internet.