Portugal's Vortalgate — No Microsoft, No Bidding 312
An anonymous reader writes "Companies using software other than Microsoft's are unable to bid at many Portuguese public tenders. This is due to the use of Silverlight 2.0 technology by the company, Vortal, contracted to build the e-procurement portal. This situation has triggered a complaint to the European Commission by the Portuguese Open Source Business Association; the case is unofficially known in Portugal as 'Vortalgate.'"
Macs, moonlight. (Score:3, Insightful)
What about Macs, and Moonlight. Granted Using Silverlight is a stupid move done by STUPID Developers, and braindead PHB. But still if you wanted to do bidding you had ways.
Re:Macs, moonlight. (Score:5, Informative)
Major Pain quote (Score:2)
One! Don't you feel dumb.
Two! Look at you.
Three! Don't you ever make jokes about me behind my back or else I'll stomp you into the ground
http://www.mono-project.com/news/archive/2009/Jan-13.html [mono-project.com]
-Rick
Re: (Score:2)
Sonofabitch, I posted the wrong link.
Don't I look dumb.
-Rick
Re:Macs, moonlight. (Score:5, Insightful)
And by the time we get Moonlight 2.0, Silverlight will be 3.0. You'd almost think they were doing it on purpose...
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
History, which repeats itself, repetitively shows that Microsoft never does something when they are not going to gain extra profit and/or extra lockin.
So yes, they are doing it on purpose. First they let everybody think "ah it's ok. It's cross platform and also available on Linux. Let's develop for it people!". And then when everybody does it KABOOM! No more support for the competition.
Re:Macs, moonlight. (Score:5, Insightful)
Well, suppose you're selling GNU/Linux desktops. Now to make your bidding for a public tender in Portugal you need to NOT USE your own dogfood?
You need to buy from your competitors in order to compete against them?
Seriously folks, this is a REAL issue (plus, this mess was paid with my taxes, I'll have to demand a refund).
Re: (Score:2)
Really? Don't you think that Adobe or Apple might have something to say about it?
And so would any competitor. But to the businesses actually doing the bidding, the relevent parties, I would wager none have any issues.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Really? Don't you think that Adobe or Apple might have something to say about it?
And so would any competitor.
But to the businesses actually doing the bidding, the relevent parties, I would wager none have any issues.
Well of course the ones doing the bidding don't have any issue with it, it's the ones that can't do the bidding that don't like it. The relevant parties are not just those doing the bidding, it's also anyone who might want to bid in the future.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Why? Because it's safe to assume everyone uses Windows and Microsoft technologies?
Wrong answer. That would be like the U.S. government assuming everyone drove Fords.
Good (Score:2, Funny)
Good for Portugal. It is about time some country stood up for quality closed-source software in the face of all you open-source zealots who won't take total cost of ownership into account.
I am shocked, shocked I tell you (Score:2)
Incompetence or corruption, which is worse?
Re: (Score:2)
I'm more shocked to learn that the -gate postfix is used outside of the US! Or, indeed, even English-speaking countries!
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously, that was the most shocking thing I got out of the article.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
I'm more shocked to learn that the -gate postfix is used outside of the US! Or, indeed, even English-speaking countries!
Oh, but it is.
We even use colgate around here.
Re:I am shocked, shocked I tell you (Score:5, Informative)
Speaking as a portuguese, I can tell you that the whole "-gate" postfixing is senseless.. It just doesn't carry weight around here as it does over there. I'd wager the submitter knew this, but just added it anyway because a) he/she is "close" to the matter (probably belongs to the group who's denouncing the situation) and therefore takes this issue seriously and b) wanted to exarcerbate the impact of this news piece by way of a commonly used word-gimmick.. After all, your own media abuses the term whenever some sort of scandal crops up.
As far as "-gate" scandals go, there's another one a LOT more prone to getting that tag (allegations of impropriety or downright corruption that may implicate the current Prime-Minister regarding the licensing of a big real estate development when he was Minister for the Environment -- and therefore had specific oversight on these matters), a huge mess. And even THAT didn't get tagged "Freeport-gate". It would mean nothing to the majority of people here, many would probably not even get the historical reference (even with "Frost vs Nixon").
To be honest, and again speaking as a portuguese citizen, this is the first I'm hearing about it (and the first time I've heard about this particular portal, to be frank). As far as I can tell, this relates to a governmental portal for job procurement/hiring.. The "bidding" here either relates to companies wishing to offer services, applying for consulting positions (getting contracts) or for people trying to get employed.
It's obviously a Bad Thing(TM) but I doubt it was done intentionally and even less that MS had anything to do with it. Not that MS is above this, of course, and they do enjoy a cosy relationship with Portugal and portuguese institutions (we're a small country and they're a BIIIIG corporation -- it's "good business" to keep a major player/investor like that happy, however it may sicken me that we need it) but as other posters have pointed out, this is Vortal's own doing.
Silverlight is a new technology and Microsoft has been investing heavily around here.. I personally know many aspiring developers (as well as fully-fledged software engineers) who genuinely think Microsoft is God's gift to software engineering.. And it doesn't help that MS does indeed get some things right now and then. :)
The way I see it, whomever made the decision to use SL (and the ensuing IE-optimized html code -- even the places you can go without Silverlight installed really suck with Firefox, the usability/interoperability is seriously broken) didn't think things through, or honestly felt that Silverlight is the Next Big Thing(TM), and that going with it would be a clever move.
It's another reflection of the worst thing that Microsoft has managed to instill into so many people, often through the deals they broker with education institutions: the mono-culture mentality.. That only Windows matters (in fact, for nearly all non-CS students, Windows is pretty much IT, and even Apple has only recently begun to show up on their mental map). That as long as you develop for THEIR platform and use their technologies, you'll reach that huge percentage of users, the magic Windows OS desktop-share.. And that the rest basically don't matter. It's so sad seeing this happen in the very places that used to be all about inclusion, early adoption of ALL technologies and diversity.
The submitter over-dramatized the impact that this is having over here, but I'm glad that the complaint went through and hope they can coax the European Courts to issue a legally binding EU-wide mandate on interoperability.
Re: (Score:2)
Seems to me if you were aLinux company you could just buy a $300 eeepc to make bids with quicker and cheaper than throwing a fit about Silverlight.
Re: (Score:2)
...that such a thing could happen. Incompetence or corruption, which is worse?
Incompetence, if only because so many people are so quick to excuse and defend it. There are not a lot of apologists for corruption.
As a representative of Vortal.pt ... (Score:5, Funny)
... I must object to these allegations in the strongest terms. Our QA department went above and beyond the call of duty to ensure compatibility, by testing our software not only on HP and Dell computers, but also Lenovo, Sony, and Acer. Whatever objections these critics have are clearly spurious.
It's 2009 (Score:5, Insightful)
Silverlight comes along offering nothing new but plenty of obstacles and lock-out of end user browsers, requiring active download of a plug-in, and yet, there are bozos out there willing to commit paying customers and their websites to an endless, costly, non-standard nightmare in exchange for nothing! You can't make shit like that up, it's real.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
And that silverlight was more or less flash but is easy to program for.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I was under a similar impression, except that Silverlight, while being easier to program for, actually blows Flash out of the water in functionality.
I know that my experiences with Silverlight have been overwhelmingly positive compared to Flash.
It's also worth mentioning that Silverlight works well in Chrome, Firefox, and Safari on Windows, as well as Firefox and Safari on OS X.
Moonlight even works on Firefox on Linux, and it's getting better at a pretty good rate.
Complaining that it requires a separate plu
Re:It's 2009 (Score:5, Informative)
Moonlight even works on Firefox on Linux, and it's getting better at a pretty good rate.
Moonlight doesn't support Silverlight 2.0-targeted code. You're being a bit disingenious implying that Silverlight code works on Firefox. Some of it does, but a great deal of it does not. Much of it even requires a Windows client.
That is what we call 'vendor lock-in'.
Re: (Score:2)
You're being a bit disingenious implying that Silverlight code works on Firefox. Some of it does, but a great deal of it does not. Much of it even requires a Windows client.
Are you being disingenuous now? Fully featured silverlight exists for Mac, where you can run it with Firefox, Safari, etc.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Silverlight supports Firefox as well as it supports IE on both Windows and MacOS.
I do not remember the last time I even used IE on Windows to browse the web, and there have been *no* sites that use Silverlight that fail under firefox (we try a lot of them when looking for the "next sample to get working on Moonlight" from http://silverlight.net/Showcase [silverlight.net]).
If what you were implying though was that Moonlight 2.0 was not ready to run Silverlight 2.0 content, you are right. Moonlight, the open source version of
Re:It's 2009 (Score:4, Insightful)
I know nothing of web programing
And yet, you still decided that your opinions on this subject are worth sharing with the world. I love slashdot.
Re: (Score:2)
And yet, you still decided that your opinions on this subject are worth sharing with the world. I love slashdot.
God, that's the story of the Internet now.
Have you noticed how in the past 5 years or so, googling answers to technical issues has become horrible? It seems like anywhere somebody asks a question, dozens of people who don't have a CLUE will chime in. The real, SMART responses get lost in the noise.
Is it really that hard to NOT answer a question if you don't know the answer?
No doubt the same people that do this are the ones who marked you flamebait.....
Re: (Score:2)
Hell, this guy's not the worst. At least he admits up-front he doesn't know much.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Two concrete reasons why Flex is better than Silverlight:
1 - The reference SDK implementation is open source. (Adobe sells a closed-source Flex IDE, but it's not required to make Flex apps.)
2 - Flash is fully supported on Windows, Mac and Linux. By "fully supported", I mean that I can count on having the latest version of the runtime for my platform, and I don't have to depend on some third-party reverse-engineered port that always lags behind the official version.
Re: (Score:2)
Flash didn't suck at that, it just wasn't convenient on the development side. But ActionScript being equivalent to Javascript, it can be very functional. Apparently Adobe is fixing most of dev side issues via Flex.
Re:It's 2009 (Score:5, Insightful)
...and yet, there are bozos out there willing to commit paying customers and their websites to an endless, costly, non-standard nightmare in exchange for nothing! You can't make shit like that up, it's real.
QFE. You've just summed up all problems in the IT industry in one sentence.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, from what I hear, Silverlight is actually pretty good and some of us hate flash. Still, probably a stupid choice for that developer to make unless it gave t
Re: (Score:2)
pdf is way more open than doc. wayway more open than this abomination silverlight. not sure about that "whatever" you mentioned.
it's been bad enough with flash, we really don't need another shitty provider of tech that everybody thinks is shiny enough to use everywhere. especially when requires for government contracts.
Just use a PC to submit your bid
right. with which operating system btw ?
why didn't you specify vendor ? maybe such a procurement site could require a specific cpu and ram vendor, wouldn't that be a good idea ? and hey, ther
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
You're missing the point. There is simply no sane reason for a fucking government procurement website to use Flash or Silverlight or Java for that matter on the client side! The Irish government is reknowned for sucking microsoft cock, and even they manage to have a standards-compliant cross-platform procurement site. They're clearly using microsoft on the server side (.aspx!), but they don't prevent companies not using microsoft tools accessing the site.
http://www.e-tenders.gov.ie/search/search_mainpage.a [e-tenders.gov.ie]
Re: (Score:2)
The Irish government is reknowned for sucking microsoft cock, and even they manage to have a standards-compliant cross-platform procurement site. They're clearly using microsoft on the server side (.aspx!), but they don't prevent companies not using microsoft tools accessing the site.
http://www.e-tenders.gov.ie/search/search_mainpage.aspx [e-tenders.gov.ie]
Well, given that Ireland's country code is "ie", they're pretty much stuck with Microsoft I'd think.
Vortalgate? (Score:2)
Re:Vortalgate? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
for every, no. in general, yes. :)
we had a corruption scandal where politicans and other persons were involved in a bribing attempt that got widely publicised - it was called -gate, by the name of the city where the corruption attempt occured. it sounded lame, but journalists liked it.
of course, nobody who actually organised it was charged with anything
Flash has wonderful Linux support, I suppose (Score:3, Insightful)
I suppose Flash is much better supported on Linux. Hmmm. Yes there are flash versions, but Adobe took their sweet time about it, did they not?
I'm not a FAN of silverlight (or flash!), but Silverlight seems to be better supported on Linux and Mac than Flash was initially. I could be wrong about that.
I don't undrestand why Microsoft gets blamed for producing a product that isn't supported on platforms that Windows isn't supported on. I may as well complain that it took forEVER for Amarok to get Windows support, and it's STILL not available! Or, even better, that Safari took forEVER to be ported to Windows! Or whatever other software you care to complain about.
If developers choose to use a MS only product, that's not MS's fault. Ms is under no obligation to produce software that works with everyone's, including their competitors, operating system. That makes no sense, monopoly or no monopoly. Now, if they were forcing the developers to use Silverlight, or forcing Adobe not to let Flash have a Windows version, that's different.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If developers choose to use a MS only product, that's not MS's fault.
Yeah, and it's the developers that mostly get the blame anyway.
C.f. all the flaming around mono.
What does Flash have to do with it? (Score:2)
I'm not a FAN of silverlight (or flash!), but Silverlight seems to be better supported on Linux and Mac than Flash was initially. I could be wrong about that.
Why on earth do you imagine you would you need either Silverlight or Flash to submit a bid?
This isn't a frigging high end interactive-video-entertainment application, this is something that shouldn't need anything more than Mosaic 1.0 or Lynx.
Re: (Score:2)
I have no idea why it would need Silverlight or Flash to submit a bid, but that doesn't matter. This has nothing to do with Microsoft. It has to do with website designers/programmers. So blame the developeres and programmers, not companies for producing products that developers and programmers wrongly or incorrectly use.
Re: (Score:2)
This has nothing to do with Microsoft. It has to do with website designers/programmers.
It sounds like they're correctly blaming the website designers/programmers, so (AGAIN) why are you babbling about Fla
Re: (Score:2)
Who blames Microsoft? The only person who should receive blame is the developers who choose it for anything that isn't explicitly supposed to be Windows only.
Re: (Score:2)
Portugese vortigaunts (Score:2)
I don't know why the vortigaunts in question don't just zap the portugese computers and make them work. They do wonders for pretty much anything else. I mean, I don't know anything about computers besides how to play half life 2 and even -I- know that much.
Vortal Inputs? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Kdawson (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, because no one here is biased...
Re:Kdawson (Score:5, Insightful)
> This is due to the use of Silverlight 2.0 technology by the company,
> Vortal, contracted to build the e-procurement portal.
I'm sure the bid said, "accessible via any computer with a web browser"? Or "apps available under x, y, and z OS's", or some such?
Quite frankly, although Microsoft getting people dependent on their proprietary APIs is a common business model, this isn't really Microsoft's fault, but Vortal's. Or the doof who put together the RFQ for this particular service for not being more specific about what kinds of computers can access it.
Re:Kdawson (Score:4, Insightful)
Quite frankly, although Microsoft getting people dependent on their proprietary APIs is a common business model, this isn't really Microsoft's fault, but Vortal's.
Well, sort of. Remember that ongoing prosecution of MS in the EU courts for antitrust abuse? Remember what it is about? MS intentionally broke interoperability with Web standards and prevented Web standards from advancing and being more functional on the majority of user's systems by leveraging their Windows monopoly to artificially promote IE. As a result, it is harder for companies like Vortal to implement a procurement system using Web standards, resulting in more companies using Silverlight (and Flash). But since Silverlight is another Microsoft product... well hopefully you see where this is going.
You can argue Vortal should not have used Silverlight for this project and I'd agree with you. That doesn't mean MS bears no guilt for making developing this with interoperable Web standards artificially difficult for Vortal.
Re:Kdawson (Score:4, Interesting)
Point is: MS is dominant. MS is proprietary. In other words that means that Microsoft uses it's dominant position to release some stuff that nobody is allowed to know how it works, and so competition is doomed. That means anti-trust. That means that the EU needs to start kicking some serious ass along the lines of "Microsoft, open up the specs, release without a license, stick to your specs, otherwise you are no longer allowed to release new software on the EU. No fines. No multi-billion dollar payments. Just do it or lose the right to sell anything untill you comply.
It. Must. Be. Like. That. And. No. Other. Way.
Re:Kdawson (Score:5, Insightful)
Why use any proprietary system which reaches 70% of the people when you can use Standards and reach 100% of the people? I fault the idiots who can't recognize the trap this is.
The other possibility is the people who spec this system are too young to recall how bad it was under the heyday of the Microsoft Dictatorship. Development stalled, bugs went unpatched, exploits soared, functionality went down, costs went up, better technologies died etc. Now, the younger generation doesn't believe you when you refer to Microsoft as the Evil Overlord. It's just another vendor now.
I guess we have come a long way.
Re: (Score:3)
I wouldn't worry a whole lot. There's room for so much improvement in their offerings that (are you listening, semi-rich person who's wondering where to put their money?) you could invest in improving GRASS, repackage it with a sharp UI, and make a fucking mint. Basically, GIS is too big for one company to contain. It's going to blow up in probably three or four years, just judging by the rapid clue-getting by people who do actual work.
It's such a shame that people don't see what a huge impact GIS will h
Re:Kdawson (Score:5, Insightful)
Silverlight is a wonderful programming platform, easier and more elegant than flash will ever be
That's nice and everything, but anyone using Flash OR Silverlight as a required part of a tendering process needs to be put down for the good of humanity. What could possibly have been going on in their tiny little minds? Responding to this insanity by babbling about Silverlight being better than Flash is absurd.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I do internal development, on a controlled environment, and I have been pushing for moving to Silverlight for the last 3 months or so.
Our users are demanding more 'Web 2.0' styled interfaces, but we're currently supporting IE 5.5, 6, 7, FF 3, and a handful of Opera users.
The incredible mish-mash of CSS/HTML/Javascript/ASP.Net/AJAX/JQuery can do it sure. But it is a royal pain in the ass. The design paradigm looks like something out of a Dr Sues book.
By switching to Silverlight we gain all of the UI features
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
My experience with Moonlight on Debian Lenny under Iceweasel:
I play a game called Conquer Club (online Risk). There are greasemonkey scripts for getting data and one of them uses Silverlight to draw graphs. I figured I'd try it. I get linked to the MS site, which routes me to the Moonlight home. I click the install and the plugin is dropped into my browser. Easy enough. I go back to the page that required Silverlight... doesn't detect it. I click on the Silverlight "get it now" picture and my browser
Re:Kdawson (Score:4, Insightful)
You seem to forget Microsoft attitude towards software patents and Linux. Microsoft is allowing a (mostly unfunctional) implementation of Silverlight in order to get the perception of it being cross platform, but at some point, and by murphy's law it will be the worst time for your deployment, they will pull the patents card from their sleve.
Re:Kdawson (Score:5, Insightful)
And sliverlight runs under what broswers? It will run under IE 5.5 right? Why not just demand all your users get Firefox 3/Opera/Safari 4 and write cutting edge CSS3 pages with XML and SVG for all those cool effects. The only browser that's broken is IE. Yet every body jumps to the "microsoft only" solution as the savior to the problem??? Why???
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Had you ever actually done any work with XML and SVG you'd know that the browser support they have is no comparison to Flash, and I presume Silverlight (I refuse to look at it so I know no specifics about it).
The company I work for uses a Flash based system to get some things done, Adobe has killed part of what that system used for generating dynamic Flash content, I.E. Macromedia Generator. The OSS/Free clone isn't capable of what we want to do, and rather than fixing it up and proping up a retarded and
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Why do you think all this CSS/Javascript/HTML/Ajax/whatever doesn't work in allo those browsers, it's because of what Microsoft did.
This is probably the worst reason to go with Microsoft-technology, because you know you will just create an evironment where it easier for them to create the same bad situation all over again.
Don't push Silverlight, push Firefox or something. Use open standards. Maybe use Firefox Prism.
Just so you know, there are MSI-packages of Firefox for Windows as well if you need them.
Hell
Re:Kdawson (Score:5, Insightful)
...and when Microsoft has wrapped your entire world into a compendium of proprietary digital glop with no hope of improvement, only then will you realize how bad it can be.
...again.
Re: (Score:2)
only to those on the outside
Everyone will be on the outside when the price of watching your own media skyrockets, or your machine is scrubbed of things deemed "illegal".
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
No, it's a trap. Use it at your peril.
Re:Kdawson (Score:4, Insightful)
It's not about the quality of Silverlight, if you didn't get it go read again.
People with other Operating Systems other than those provided by Microsoft are not able to access a governmental website, that is what is being discussed.
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, if it doesn't, you have the source so fix it yourself.
Sorry, what planet were you from again? Telling Aunt Mildred "you have the source, so fix it yourself" isn't going to fly.
As for trotting out apple, you're hopelessly naive if you think that microsoft won't kill the OSX version of silverlight the minute apple's market share gets a little bigger than microsoft would like.
For the government to put microsoft firmly in control of a lever by which which can hurt its competitors as much as it likes is like putting the proverbial fox in charge of the henhouse.
Re: (Score:2)
As for trotting out apple, you're hopelessly naive if you think that microsoft won't kill the OSX version of silverlight the minute apple's market share gets a little bigger than microsoft would like.
No doubt just like they killed Office.
I would tend to think you're hopelessly paranoid on the topic, if we're going to be tossing around superlatives.
Re: (Score:2)
No doubt just like they killed Office.
Microsoft nearly did kill Office for the Mac, but was a required part of a dispute settlement. Now, it's too profitable to kill off. That's called a dilemma.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Microsoft nearly did kill Office for the Mac, but was a required part of a dispute settlement. Now, it's too profitable to kill off. That's called a dilemma.
MSOffice for the Mac is profitable, but not so much that MS could not kill it if they thought it strategic. The reason they don't is because it would not be a good move for them. Nearly everyone knows MS has a monopoly on desktop OS's, but they also have monopoly influence on the office suite software market. They've spent huge amounts of money in settlements making sure no court case ever gets to the point where that is an official ruling, but it is true nonetheless. It is one of their largest lock-ins to
Re:Kdawson (Score:4, Insightful)
Of course, if it doesn't, you have the source so fix it yourself.
And the specs to see what needs to be complied to? Oh wait...
Re:Kdawson (Score:5, Insightful)
Mono will always be behind and you can count on MacOSX support being dropped quite soon. Using Silverlight now is no different than what using activeX meant in the past.
Re: (Score:2)
Mono will always be behind and you can count on MacOSX support being dropped quite soon.
I agree with the first statement. However, when did Microsoft decide to drop Silverlight for OS X?
Re: (Score:2)
Mono will always be behind and you can count on MacOSX support being dropped quite soon.
Except ActiveX was more or less impossible to be cross platform. Silverlight is not.
You're also the second person I've seen trotting out the meme that Microsoft is "just about to" kill Silverlight on the Mac. What makes you believe that?
Re: (Score:2)
IE for OSX.
Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Re: (Score:3)
LOL, MS discontinued IE for Mac, so they're going to discontinue Silverlight. Yup, that's bulletproof.
It certainly isn't bulletproof, but it is MS's tried and true business strategy. Embrace, extend, extinguish. Once they have sufficient market share for a technology and the competition is hosed, they tend to make those technologies exclusive to their platform. It's not just IE.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Moonlight only exists because MS have disclosed most of the implementation details to them, it still lags a long way behind the MS implementation and isn't 100% compatible anyway.
Moonlight exists because we were able to put a prototype together in 21 days (you can read about our hack-a-thon here: http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2007/Jun-21.html [tirania.org]).
Microsoft has since helped us by providing licensed codecs that can be used by Linux users; Providing us with Silverlight specs for a full open source impleentation (Although 100% of it is available on the web at msdn.microsoft.com) and they provided us with test suites to ensure that Moonlight passes every single Silverlight test suite
Re:Kdawson (Score:5, Insightful)
And even better, if you don't work for Novell, and use it via Mono, you might even get sued! Yay for patent-encumbered software that relies on the goodwill of a multiple-conviction monopolist.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
And even better, if you don't work for Novell, and use it via Mono, you might even get sued! Yay for patent-encumbered software that relies on the goodwill of a multiple-conviction monopolist.
Bu... But Microsoft products are an IT industry standard.
yea (Score:2)
.net was a wonderful platform adopted by everyone. and flash was the driving force behind web.
in an alternate reality perhaps.
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Another informative jewel by our "friend" kdawson. Silverlight is just another technology, like flash, java, or you name it.
And a closed one at that.
He does bring up a good point: Shouldn't public interfaces use speech-free technologies? Why is Javascript not good enough?
It's just getting more and more popular, and there is direct support for Windows and MacOs. The mono team is doing a wonderful work bringing Silverlight for Linux as Moonlight. True, 2.0 is not really supported yet, but it's on it's way, really soon now (TM).
Translation: if you want to use it without hassles, you'll have to buy something from an american company.
P.S. HURD is "on its way, really soon now (TM)", too.
Re:Kdawson (Score:4, Insightful)
If the company were Chinese would that make you happier?
You shouldn't have to pay to use a government website. Especially not someone in a different country.
Am I asking too much?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Really, that saying was a saying? The old saying was "Nobody ever got fired for choosing IBM."
MS replaced IBM in the saying in the 90s, in what I am certain was a campaign by MS sales agents.
Re: (Score:2)
It's a bom deal for Microsoft... ;)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
If you really had one you would be using Lynx or HyperLink. So STFU and GTFO.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I have a commodore_64 for which has been working just fine for me for many many years, but I am told that I must have a "web browser" in order to post comments to the Slashdot web site.
Don't worry dude, I've got you covered! [armory.com]
And forcing people to use Silverlight is nothing like that. There's no good reason to use Silverlight (or Flash for that matter) on a site that easily be done without nonstandard plugins. Remember when they used to do that 10+ years ago? Every site had its own pet video, audio, or oth
Re:I, for one, (Score:5, Funny)
Sadly, we have yet to understand the full repercussions of Suffixgate, but I suspect they will be with us for a long, long time.
Re:Open Source vs. Closed Source (Score:5, Insightful)
No, the HUNDREDS of other people in this discussion pointing out that Moonlight is trailing Silverlight feature-wise and that Silverlight 2.0 code CAN NOT run on Moonlight currently, have not forgotten Moonlight.
Re: (Score:2)
Only silverlight 1.0, that site users 2.0. When moonlight gets to that silverlight will probably be 3.0.
There are plenty of licensing snafus as you have to download a closed source media library just to play video with it. IT'S A TRAP!
Then once it is nice and entrenched MS will kill silverlight for OSX, just like IE for OSX.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Are we all forgetting about Moonlight?
Okay, other people clued you in about this.
...while retaining no licensing snafus.
That's a really hard assertion to prove.
Basically, you're all letting your fanboy rage over Microsoft blind your sense to the point that you're pushing a fully proprietary non-oss solution (flash) over a fully open source solution.
Who's promoting Flash? This could be done in Java or javascript even using all open Web standards. Failing that, Flash is not being promoted by a criminal organization whose trust gives them direct, financial incentive to break compatibility with other versions. Finally, Adobe pushing the proprietary Flash upon the industry is not illegal since they aren't abusing a monopoly in another market to do it.
As far as I can tell, it doesn't matter how much better the development is made by tools, docs, and language, or how open source the project is... all that matters is Microsoft affiliation.
Not at all. I'm just as
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Who supports HTML 5? It's not even a complete standard. So it's hardly specified much less implemented.
There is an implementable draft and it is partly implemented by basically all the browsers except IE. The point being, we're talking about pushing new technologies (which Silverlight 2 is) to solve the problem. Not that new technologies are needed, mind you, that was just for the sake of illustrating the point.
Are you honestly suggesting a non-existent solution vs. an existent and supported one?
I'm not suggesting anyone implement anything in any particular technology. I'm mentioning that MS's actions in promoting Silverlight are probably illegal and this is evidence of damages.
RTFA. The Portugal Free Software Wingbat club is challenging it to a governing body.
You RTFA. From