Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

SpringSource Acquires Hyperic, Possibly Set to Target Microsoft and IBM 130

Many sources are reporting that SpringSource has acquired Hyperic, creating a company that could go after IBM and Microsoft. SpringSource has long dreamed of being able to offer a complete open source solution that accelerates the entire build, run, manage Java application lifecycle, and Hyperic offers the last piece of the puzzle. "Regardless, the SpringSource/Hyperic combination creates a clear and present danger to IBM and Microsoft, two companies that have largely stood alone in the ability to build, run, and manage applications. It's also a significant boon to companies looking to open source to save money and improve productivity. Is it a sign of good things to come from not only SpringSource, but also open source, generally? Time will tell, but I suspect we're on the cusp of an aggressive and ambitious new phase in open-source competition."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

SpringSource Acquires Hyperic, Possibly Set to Target Microsoft and IBM

Comments Filter:
  • Umm... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by qw0ntum ( 831414 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @03:49PM (#27820179) Journal
    Microsoft and IBM have lots of competitors (Oracle comes readily to mind). What makes this different, besides the fact I've never heard of either of these companies? A blogger I've also never heard of who wants hits?
  • Two questions (Score:5, Insightful)

    by chill ( 34294 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @03:56PM (#27820253) Journal

    1. Who the hell is SpringSource?
    2. Who the hell is Hyberic?

    Regardless, the SpringSource/Hyperic combination creates a clear and present danger to IBM and Microsoft...

    Unless SpringSource or Hyperic has a few billion dollars in the bank that I'm blissfully unaware of, or their own nuclear arsenal, I don't believe this blogger is using the phrase "clear and present danger" in a manner consistent with reality.

  • by Anenome ( 1250374 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @03:58PM (#27820285)

    *The TV glows to life in a moment; it's News at 11*

      In other news, journalist makes laughable prediction that two companies you've never heard of can threaten two of the largest companies in existence. Media-watchers cynically called this a blogger stunt to boost website hits, noting that sites such as Slashdot "drive a lot of hits" which, combined with Google Adsense, turns into cash for news site, Cnet.com, which hosted the article. Comments, Linda?

      News organizations cynically driving consumers to their web pages with fake news, how low can you go?

      (laughing) You tell 'em.

      For more information on this and other top stories visit our website!

  • Riiiiight. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by whisper_jeff ( 680366 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @04:00PM (#27820333)
    Two companies you've never heard of merge to create a unified company you won't remember in a week and present no danger what-so-ever to Microsoft nor IBM. I mean, seriously. Let's be real here.
  • Compete OSS first (Score:2, Insightful)

    by ultrabot ( 200914 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @04:01PM (#27820347)

    I'd like to see how well they compete with open source solutions first (Django, Rails), before getting excited about conquering the whole industry.

    It seem they are still dragging that Albatross "Java" in their nets, hopefully it can do a few more tricks,

  • by glwtta ( 532858 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @04:45PM (#27820983) Homepage
    Really, how hard is it to throw in a "monitoring app" somewhere along with all the hyperbole, so people can actually tell if they give a damn?

    Yeah, yeah, this is (- A billion, Redundant), but where's the sorely needed (-1, Terrible summary)?
  • Re:Blah (Score:3, Insightful)

    by julesh ( 229690 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @05:14PM (#27821469)

    Looked interesting till I read 'Java'.

    So, clearly, having decided that this wasn't a story you were interested in, you ignored it, didn't read any further, and didn't post in the comments thread.

    Or at least, that's what most of the rest of us would have done. Why do you feel the need to complain when /. posts a story on a topic you don't care about?

  • Re:Hyperic (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Zarquil ( 187770 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @07:25PM (#27823503)

    Slow. It's Java based, I didn't expect it to be lightning fast. Really bloody easy to add in and configure modules. Pathetically simple to add in a new server to monitor. Navigation takes a while to adapt to.

    Great for me on my servers with head space. It's not for everyone and it wasn't my first choice, but after I used it a bit I liked it a lot.

    If you've evaluated it and found it lacking, good for you. Tell me what you prefer and I'll look at it. If you're one of the thousands of drones babbling, "What the fuck is Hyperic?" you at least have a basic answer.

  • Re:Umm... (Score:2, Insightful)

    by noidentity ( 188756 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @08:33PM (#27824481)
    Hey, where do I sign up to astroturf for this company? Uh oh, did I just break the first rule of astroturfing, "don't talk about astroturfing"?

"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra

Working...