Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Image

External Airbag Designed to Protect Pedestrians 253

Thanks to researchers at Cranfield University, you don't have to feel bad when you plow into a group of pedestrians who are crossing the street too slowly. They have designed an external airbag that mounts to your hood at the base of the windshield. Research shows that this is the area where a pedestrian's head is most likely to hit in an accident. "Test results indicate that the system works extremely well. When fitted to a demonstrator vehicle not originally designed with pedestrian protection in mind, the results were well inside all current legal criteria for pedestrian protection currently in force in Europe," Roger Hardy of the university's Cranfield Impact Centre said.

*

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

External Airbag Designed to Protect Pedestrians

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Ok ? (Score:4, Informative)

    by PotatoFarmer ( 1250696 ) on Wednesday May 06, 2009 @04:50PM (#27851111)
    Note that this story is coming out of the UK, not the US. The majority of the car-driving world drives smaller vehicles.
  • Re:Ok ? (Score:5, Informative)

    by Moryath ( 553296 ) on Wednesday May 06, 2009 @04:53PM (#27851163)

    The problem is, impacts are not predictable.

    The "most likely spot" to hit, is actually depending on the following factors:
    - Speed of collision
    - Braking/coasting/accelerating (braking typically causes a vehicle's nose to dip, accelerating causes it to rise)
    - Height of the pedestrian in relation to the height of the vehicle's front bumper/grille.
    - Angle of collision (pedestrian motion will be different if hit head-on, as opposed to someone trying to whip around a right-hand turn and blindsiding someone who's crossing properly; angle also changes if you're not at a right-angle intersection)

    The other problem is, does this truly cushion the blow, taking the energy into the crashbag and causing the pedestrian to be more likely to remain on the stopped vehicle, or is it more elastic, imparting acceleration back into the poor pedestrian in time for them to slide off the car - now accelerated to a good 15-20mph or higher - and then hit their head on the cement?

     

  • Re:Farmers Markets (Score:3, Informative)

    by VorpalRodent ( 964940 ) on Wednesday May 06, 2009 @05:04PM (#27851345)

    There is a fundamental flaw here - your statement implies that the onus is on pedestrians and the locations they frequent to protect themselves (or, worse yet, on drivers to not hit pedestrians).

    The truth of the matter is that it is the responsibility of automobile manufacturers to ensure that people not riding in cars are safe at all times.

  • by Swizec ( 978239 ) on Wednesday May 06, 2009 @05:10PM (#27851467) Homepage
    Most cars on the road today are not compliant to the new standards beacause they were changed last year and are only enforced on NEW vehicles. However, I don't believe even all new vehicles have to comply this year already but have a few year's time to adapt.

    The most notable change you can see is that all new European cars (model year 2009) have an extremely high front bumper and are incredibly round on that end making them look somewhat chubby. Most of them are also made so the bonnet can collapse under a pedestrian's weight while also making sure they don't hit the engine or something on it.

    Another very noticable change is that the edge between bonnet and wind screen is no longer a sharp metalic edge on most cars, but has a smooth transition made of plastic.

    I am saying this as an armchair crash test fanatic, not an expert in the field so I might be marginally incorrect on some points.
  • by alexschmidt ( 1026034 ) on Wednesday May 06, 2009 @05:48PM (#27852035)
    ..and look around you when you are walking around. I'm sure many of us have seen people just blindly walk into the road figuring 'well, I have the right of way, car must stop'... Defensive driving is about paying attention and looking ahead. The same applies when you are walking around. If you are walking into traffic without paying attention, it's 'evolution in action'. This sort of safety mechanism is stupid and expensive and really won't do much to save lives. If you get hit by a car at anything over 20kph, you'll likely spend the rest of your life in a wheelchair drooling.
  • by Swizec ( 978239 ) on Wednesday May 06, 2009 @08:23PM (#27853749) Homepage
    No no, not hte bumper being higher - the overall bumper's height being greater ie. bigger impact surface area == less pressure == less injury. And of course the whole not being flung up into the air and onto the car is a rather nice side-effect too.

    To my knowledge the discovery was made by accident because fewer people died being hit by SUV's than larger cars, which seemed odd because SUV's are heavier and thus more energy is transfered.
  • by John Hasler ( 414242 ) on Wednesday May 06, 2009 @09:03PM (#27854113) Homepage

    So if some guy leans on your hood he does $800 damage?

  • Re:Ohhh! (Score:3, Informative)

    by greyhueofdoubt ( 1159527 ) on Wednesday May 06, 2009 @09:23PM (#27854271) Homepage Journal

    It's still there, as far as I can tell. The only time I see a link to it is when I have mod points, though- it's right at the top of the discussion.

    -b

  • by greyhueofdoubt ( 1159527 ) on Wednesday May 06, 2009 @09:32PM (#27854341) Homepage Journal

    An airbag is not like a beachball- it's not elastic. In fact, it has to be inelastic for it to work. If in-car airbags acted like you described, they would simply cause the driver's head to bounce back into the headrest, causing massive brain injury. The airbag works by decelerating the head more slowly than the steering wheel would. 40 mph to 0 mpg in a few milliseconds versus a much larger fraction of a second is HUGE in terms of physics.

    The best way to protect a falling egg is to drop it onto something inelastic yet yielding- a pile of goose down would work well, for example. Airbags work on this principle (as do crumple zones): Slow the deceleration, absorb the energy (as opposed to transferring it like a bouncy ball), person lives (usually).

    A pedestrian airbag would work like that- more a pile of leaves than a trampoline. Find a video on youtube or something of the airbags used by stuntmen in movies- they don't bounce, they deflate.

    Hope this helps.

    -b

  • Re:Ohhh! (Score:2, Informative)

    by BrokenHalo ( 565198 ) on Thursday May 07, 2009 @01:03AM (#27855811)
    I don't believe your mod points are as closely tied to metamodding as that. But something has happened with all that dynamic content stuff Slashcode seems to have gone in for. If you set your preferences to go back to the "classic" interface, the metamod prompts appear as they used to.
  • Uh, yeah. (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 07, 2009 @07:26AM (#27857715)

    You're supposed to avoid obstructions in the road.

    Yup, he's a prick for standing where he was, but you still have the duty to avoid him and pass him safely. He doesn't have the duty to move aside.

    If you really think it necessary, your only recourse is to call the police and get him done for obstruction of traffic.

    But he doesn't have to move out of the way for you.

Kleeneness is next to Godelness.

Working...