Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Google Businesses The Internet Your Rights Online

Google Earth Raises Discrimination Issue In Japan 457

Hugh Pickens writes "The Times (UK) reports that by allowing old maps to be overlaid on satellite images of Tokyo, Osaka, and Kyoto, Google has unwittingly created a visual tool that has prolonged an ancient discrimination, says a lobbying group established to protect the human rights of three million burakumin, members of the sub-class condemned by the old feudal system in Japan to unclean jobs associated with death and dirt. 'We tend to think of maps as factual, like a satellite picture, but maps are never neutral, they always have a certain point of view,' says David Rumsey, a US map collector. Some Japanese companies actively screen out burakumin-linked job seekers, and some families hire private investigators to dig into the ancestry of fiances to make sure there is no burakumin taint. Because there is nothing physical to differentiate burakumin from other Japanese and because there are no clues in their names or accent, the only way of establishing whether or not they are burakumin is by tracing their family. By publishing the locations of burakumin ghettos with the modern street maps, the quest to trace ancestry is made easier, says Toru Matsuoka, an opposition MP and member of the Buraku Liberation League. Under pressure to diffuse criticism, Google has asked the owners of the woodblock print maps to remove the legend that identifies the ghetto with an old term, extremely offensive in modern usage, that translates loosely as 'scum town.' 'We had not acknowledged the seriousness of the map, but we do take this matter seriously,' says Yoshito Funabashi, a Google spokesman." The ancient Japanese caste system was made illegal 150 years ago, but silent discrimination remains. The issue is complicated by allegations of mob connections in the burakumin anti-discrimination organizations.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google Earth Raises Discrimination Issue In Japan

Comments Filter:
  • Irrelevant (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24, 2009 @02:50PM (#28076545)

    Most tools can be used for discrimatory purposes. Just because I buy a Ford at a used car dealership over an indistinguishable GM (because I like then better) doesn't mean the dealership should get blamed.

  • Can't be google (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24, 2009 @02:51PM (#28076551)

    Surely the problem is with the discrimination within the Japanese people and has nothing to do with Google.
    There is no difference between a person from one linage to another other than maybe their name and genetic make up.
    Just because their great great great grandfather might have killed people for a living doesn't mean that the person applying for a job now is strange in some way.

    It is obviously an old custom which is not equal and fair into days society thus the problem is not with Google.

  • by Drakkenmensch ( 1255800 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @02:53PM (#28076561)
    What Japan needs is some enlightment that can only come with a few episodes of Discovery Channel's Dirty Jobs. Watching Mike Rowe trying to shovel disgusting refuse from a leatherworking facility is not only entertaining, it teaches that those jobs are A) pretty difficult to learn and B) fundamentally necessary for civilization to continue!
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24, 2009 @02:53PM (#28076567)

    If your solution to a problem is, "We need less truth" then you are probably trying to solve the wrong problem.

  • by Chairboy ( 88841 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @02:55PM (#28076583) Homepage

    History is ugly. It's full of all the crappy things we did, and exists in part as a document to study so we can try and improve. "Those who don't study history are doomed to repeat it", but if the ugly parts are expunged, then we are erasing exactly what's needed to avoid recurrence.

    Also, all oppression begins with "We must do this to protect the innocent". Whether the darkest part of the oppression comes a month later at the hands of the current controlling authority or a century later as a result of ignorance, it still exists and is the inevitable result of censorship.

  • Re:Irrelevant (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Jurily ( 900488 ) <jurily&gmail,com> on Sunday May 24, 2009 @02:55PM (#28076591)

    Most tools can be used for discrimatory purposes.

    Maybe we should outlaw photographs because it shows skin color.

    Oh, and grammar, because the word "color" is discriminating to the colourful British.

  • Reasons (Score:4, Insightful)

    by K. S. Kyosuke ( 729550 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @02:57PM (#28076601)
    I am surprised that the "employee at a large, well-known Japanese company" was not asked *why* are they doing that. They consider it normal, alright. I know that, since I knew the problem existed even in 1980's. But I am much more interested why are Eta/Burakumin/Shinheimin/whoever treated this way by people who cannot possibly remember the Edo period.
  • What the fuck? (Score:0, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24, 2009 @02:57PM (#28076607)

    What the flying fuck does Google have to do with any of this? The problem is cultural, not technological. Get a fucking grip.

  • by argStyopa ( 232550 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @03:10PM (#28076695) Journal

    So, if a hammer is used to build a cross that the KKK burn on someone's front yard, the hammer is "enabling" racist pigs? I guess white sheets and fire enable racism too?

    Please.

    Google Maps is a map. If some racist/classist/hidebound Japanese use it for perpetuating reactionary stupid stereotypes, how is Google at fault?

    SLOW NEWS DAY, +1

  • by presidenteloco ( 659168 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @03:13PM (#28076727)

    At least now the bone-headed practice of this discrimination is known by the outside world, and the appropriate amount of scorn, ridicule, and disapproval can be heaped on the superstitious throw-back practitioners of the discrimination.

    Companies and governments from elsewhere could check whether this practice is occurring, and blacklist Japanese companies that are shown to practice this human-rights violation.

  • Re:Irrelevant (Score:3, Insightful)

    by CarpetShark ( 865376 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @03:16PM (#28076753)

    No, but if you buy a car and it arrives with "Nigger" on the license plate, because Ford bought random license plates from a racist company, then Ford (amongst others, including the individuals who chose that plate) should probably be blamed.

  • by 4D6963 ( 933028 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @03:28PM (#28076851)

    Well, when it comes to employment discrimination, it seems that allowing the less of such information to be known to anyone involved in the chain of employment is desirable.

    I mean it's easier to judge applicants for their qualifications when it's all you see than when you're told that one is a young married white Presbyterian from Connecticut and the other is an old transsexual black-hispanic communist Nation of Islam-muslim from the South Bronx.

  • by trytoguess ( 875793 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @03:28PM (#28076853)

    Um... no. The fact that a job is difficult, or necessary doesn't somehow make people more respective. Notice the lack of respect for blue collar jobs in our own culture (and probably Japan as well).

  • Re:Reasons (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Shakrai ( 717556 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @03:35PM (#28076923) Journal

    Just out of curiosity, how do you call a person who has three white and one black grand parent?

    How about 'American'? I can't be the only one that is sick of the practice of identifying ourselves based on our racial background. If I wanted to I could call myself a Polish/German/Jewish/Native/English-American. Why I would do that when those connections are generations old is beyond me. I'm an American. Plain and simple.

  • Re:Can't be google (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Blakey Rat ( 99501 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @03:36PM (#28076929)

    Yah, I read this article as: "Japanese people are racist (classist, I guess), and it's somehow Google's fault."

    But really, is this a surprise to anybody? The least-diverse country in the world in racist! Shocking!

  • Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @03:36PM (#28076933)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Re:Reasons (Score:5, Insightful)

    by that IT girl ( 864406 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @03:43PM (#28076997) Journal
    But this goes both ways too -- people should neither hate NOR grovel about the past. Just drop it. Don't deny someone their rights, but don't overdo it swinging the other direction too far either. Racism in both 'negative' (hate, denying people a job, etc) and 'positive' (slave reparations, affirmative action, etc) ways are still bad in that they take race into account at all. As long as people MAKE race an issue, it will be one. Saying someone is different because they are white or black or red or yellow is the same as saying my car is different from yours, or performs better, or is more reliable, because it's a different colour. It makes no sense.
  • by Runaway1956 ( 1322357 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @03:44PM (#28077001) Homepage Journal

    Knowledge is knowledge. How a bunch of inbred tribals use that knowledge isn't the responsibility of the people who discover and/or make it available.

    The Japanese have a problem with discrimination, not Google, not the web, and not the United States. Let Japan solve the problem, don't make it a Google problem, a web problem, or a United States problem.

  • Re:Can't be google (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Yokaze ( 70883 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @03:48PM (#28077039)

    > Surely the problem is with the discrimination within the Japanese people and has nothing to do with Google.

    The world isn't black and white. Just because Japanese society is at fault, doesn't mean Google is without fault.

    Certainly, the discrimination of burakumin is a problem of the Japanese society, but as the summary already put it, Google (unwittingly) provides tool, which simplifies the practice of ostracism of burakumin by reviving the old ghettos maps on modern maps. The discrimination is largely based on where the people have lived and currently do live. So, publicising those maps is not helping them.

    In an ideal world, the Japanese people would just stop the discrimination. But we don't live in a ideal world, and if the minority in question feels this short gap measure is necessary, I think it is sensible to comply. Or do you have a good idea, how to eradicate discrimination? The Nobel Price for Peace would be yours for sure.

  • by Zorque ( 894011 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @04:02PM (#28077125)

    So I'm assuming you knew all about the burakumin before reading the story, and were already sympathetic to their plight. Google helped the outside world to understand a social wrong occurring in a civilized country where it shouldn't be happening, I'm not sure how that counts as a slow news day.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24, 2009 @04:12PM (#28077197)

    Says the person who uses the phrase, "that's how I was learned."

  • Re:Irrelevant (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Jurily ( 900488 ) <jurily&gmail,com> on Sunday May 24, 2009 @04:18PM (#28077245)

    Don't forget Canadians as they spell it the correct way too and are more likely to run into an American who spells it color.

    If 300 million people agree "color" is correct, it is correct. Just ask the question: for whom?

  • Re:Irrelevant (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Feanturi ( 99866 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @04:31PM (#28077329)
    Your country also spells "thru". Larger values of stupid doesn't make something more correct somehow, just more stupid.
  • by ioshhdflwuegfh ( 1067182 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @04:56PM (#28077505)

    If your solution to a problem is, "We need less truth" then you are probably trying to solve the wrong problem.

    Damn, that's about the most insightful thing I've seen on Slashdot in a while. Too bad you posted AC.

    Yes it is insightful alright: an anonymous coward posting about the need for more truth, and nothing less about the uncovering of identity of a certain group people in Japan.

  • by Shakrai ( 717556 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @05:07PM (#28077561) Journal

    and down right absurd and categorically wrong to say that the target culture is not in need of enlightenment to the universally held beliefs of the equality of Man.

    What "universally held beliefs of the equality of Man" would those be? A good portion of this planet thinks that women should cover themselves at all times and need the permission of a male household member before leaving the home. A good portion of this planet thinks that chopping off the foreskin of males or the clitoris of females is an acceptable practice. A good portion of this planet believes in capital punishment while the remainder dismisses it as cruel and barbaric. A good portion of this planet thinks that freedom of speech should take a backseat to the security of the state.

    There are no universally held beliefs in the equality of man. The fact that the UN has a piece of paper listing them means nothing.

  • Re:Can't be google (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Darkness404 ( 1287218 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @05:13PM (#28077627)
    Ok, lets say some European company did the same thing with slave plantations in the USA. Say I use that to make racist comments. Surely the fault isn't on me because I'm just a pawn in society and surely society isn't at fault because theres nothing wrong with discrimination. The same logic applies here. Discrimination is fundamentally wrong, I'm sure we can all agree on that. Therefore, the logical conclusion would be societies based on discrimination would be wrong also. The Japanese culture is a very modern culture. This isn't about some tribe of people in Africa who made first contact with any other groups of people 20 years ago, but a culture on par with that of Europe and America. Discrimination should not be tolerated, its a flaw of the society and culture.
  • by Supurcell ( 834022 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @05:14PM (#28077639)
    You mean how we enshrine our(American) blue collar workers as the heroes in almost all our action movies? We spin tales of steel workers, lumberjacks, beat cops, butchers, plumbers and mechanics rising above their station and making things better for themselves and their families. There is a great respect for people who work with their hands and actually have useful skills that apply to the real world. They don't just fill out TPS reports and file worthless paperwork, they can fix their own car, build their own house, and dispense their own brand of justice.
  • by ioshhdflwuegfh ( 1067182 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @05:22PM (#28077711)

    discrimination: secernment (the cognitive process whereby two or more stimuli are distinguished)

    You are not discriminating among different meanings of word discrimination, but giving a privilege to one of its meanings.

  • by Bill, Shooter of Bul ( 629286 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @05:38PM (#28077837) Journal
    Just what are you arguing for? Jim crow laws? Apartheid? Kristallnacht? Cultural relativism is a crutch the powerful use to assuage their guilt.
  • by caywen ( 942955 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @05:40PM (#28077855)
    Seriously, Japan needs a Title VII badly. The way they treat women and Burakkumin, and the way they discriminate on age, nationality, disability, and other characteristics, show that they haven't put the kind of thought into discrimination that America had been forced to over hundreds of years.
  • by ultranova ( 717540 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @06:02PM (#28078033)

    Only a Westerner would think that another culture needs some "enlightenment" that is conveniently delivered via a media program with a Western perspective.

    True enough. Based on the history of Imperial Japan, they would deliver said enlightenment at gunpoint. Ask their neighbours about the details, the Japanese themselves seem to dislike talking about their glorious deeds for some strange reason.

    I'm really getting tired of this West-bashing. While it is indeed unlikely that a Discovery Channel special will dispel someone's silly notions about people being tainted because their ancestors buried corpses rather than made them, that doesn't change the fact that said notions are indeed silly, and making decisions that negatively affect other people based on them is downright evil. If Japanese culture is still subject to such stupidity, and Western culture is not, then Western culture is indeed superior to the Japanese one in that respect.

    This whole thing is simply the Japanese equivalent of Ku Klux Klan, nothing more. We should look down to such people with disgust and contempt, here and abroad, rather than pretend that their illogical and petty positions are somehow valid or acceptable because they have existed for a long time. Such people retard the growth of their culture and shame their ancestors by ensuring that they are remembered by their worst, rather than best; and in the process they hurt plenty of innocent people too. Way to go, Japan/Klan!

  • by CptNerd ( 455084 ) <adiseker@lexonia.net> on Sunday May 24, 2009 @06:10PM (#28078083) Homepage
    I believe you've been flattened by the irony...
  • Re:Irrelevant (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24, 2009 @06:33PM (#28078243)

    That has nothing to do with this article though.

    The original guy got it right but didn't expand on it. If I buy a Ford and use it to run down blacks, whites, jews, catholics, muslims, whatever, that doesn't mean the car is at fault for my racism. It means the person who uses it is at fault.

    Like gun laws, really.

  • Re:Numbers (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Jurily ( 900488 ) <jurily&gmail,com> on Sunday May 24, 2009 @06:37PM (#28078267)

    * First off its apparently 251,388,301 English speakers in the US not 300 million.

    Ok, +1 pedant, but the number you've quoted has changed since you posted it, so you're wrong as well.

    And consider this: if even two people agree to use a specific spelling amongst themselves, it's correct amongst themselves by definition.

  • Re:Irrelevant (Score:2, Insightful)

    by rubah ( 1197475 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @07:00PM (#28078445) Homepage

    Hey, if you want to judge by the lowest denominator, that's fine. There's plenty of teenaged brits out there for the opposing side to use.

    "Innit?" "Cos."
    etc ;)

  • Re:Irrelevant (Score:2, Insightful)

    by zippthorne ( 748122 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @07:09PM (#28078495) Journal

    First explain why "thru" is inferior to "through" a word in which 42% of the letters are not pronounced. Older doesn't make something more correct somehow either, just stupid longer.

    Also, we'd like you to please apologize for "worcester," whomever is responsible for it.

  • Re:Irrelevant (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Requiem18th ( 742389 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @07:54PM (#28078741)

    Then why aren't you speaking proto-indo-european? Languages change and you *know* that troll, the moderators are on crack today.

  • If sin is a "void concept" to you, how do you explain the universal phenomenon of people acting in ways destructive to themselves and others?

    Are you asking me for a solution to the problem of evil? I mean, we are not using a certain word the same way; it seems you call "sin" any unethical behaviour, did I get this right? No, I understand "sin" strictly as whatever violates a religious taboo.

    Now, some taboos are sensible; don't steal, don't murder, that's fine, got it. But these are so obvious, I don't need religion to teach me those; and many believers fail to do follow them anyway. On the other hand, some taboos are just nonsense, such as jewish and muslim dietary laws; some are hateful, as in religiously motivated violence against unbelievers, heretics, or homosexuals; some are quasi-genocidal, as the pope's statements against condoms; some are suicidal, like Jehovah's witnesses' rejection of blood transfusions.

  • by laughingcoyote ( 762272 ) <barghesthowl.excite@com> on Sunday May 24, 2009 @08:28PM (#28078943) Journal

    Knowledge is knowledge. How a bunch of inbred tribals use that knowledge isn't the responsibility of the people who discover and/or make it available.

    The Japanese have a problem with discrimination, not Google, not the web, and not the United States. Let Japan solve the problem, don't make it a Google problem, a web problem, or a United States problem.

    It is true that racism is ultimately a problem with the racist. However, that doesn't mean there's not any issue here. The maps Google is using use what is apparently a racial slur to describe these areas.

    That's probably unintentional, and I doubt they had any idea that the term was a slur. However, if it was brought to Google's attention that a map overlay in America referred to certain areas as "nigger ghettos", do you think people wouldn't expect Google to find a map that didn't use such terms, even if their use of that map was through oversight rather than malice?

  • Re:Reasons (Score:4, Insightful)

    by bursch-X ( 458146 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @10:08PM (#28079465)
    Even better: if your ancestors where white people from South Africa, are you an African American then? I'd say by definition, yes.
  • by rhakka ( 224319 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @11:09PM (#28079753)

    Yes, but look what you yourself wrote. "...rising above their station..."

    You wouldn't say that about a doctor or an astronaut or a scientist. The fact that their blue collar existence is a "station to be risen above" is a subtle form of bigotry.

  • by xs650 ( 741277 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @11:11PM (#28079773)
    Very close. The actual quote is

    "Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

                      --George Santayana"

    I liked the "study" misquote because it gave me an excuse to repeat my High School history teachers frequently used smart arsed remark.

    I enjoyed seeing his the teachers go right over the 1st responders head even more.

           
  • Re:I don't get it (Score:3, Insightful)

    by colinrichardday ( 768814 ) <colin.day.6@hotmail.com> on Sunday May 24, 2009 @11:51PM (#28079969)

    Except that what the Burakumin do is productive and necessary, whereas rapists simply hurt their victims. Or would like to have corpses pile up in the streets?

  • Re:Reasons (Score:5, Insightful)

    by atraintocry ( 1183485 ) on Sunday May 24, 2009 @11:57PM (#28079993)

    As he should.

    I once had a psych teacher refer to Africans (living in Africa, mind you) as African-American, because the discussion centered on skin color.

    I have nothing against cultural sensitivity, but people should just say 'black' if they're planning on being retarded.

  • by smellsofbikes ( 890263 ) on Monday May 25, 2009 @01:08AM (#28080237) Journal

    Yeah, maps do have a certain point of view. The finest thief in history was the first person who drew a property map.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 25, 2009 @01:39AM (#28080345)

    Nah, I actually tend to think that it's probably the same as my attitude to Isreal. Isreal is an abomination, a horrendous crime in progress that must be stopped. Jews, on the other hand, are absolutely fine.

    Calling something or someone anti semitic because they don't like Isreal is getting a bit old.

  • Note that EVERY major religion EXCEPT Christianity actively encourages the subjugation or extermination of non-believers in one form or another.

    Hmmm... and yet, catholics strived to eliminate all competition from the countries they controlled (only the Jewish religion managed to survive, all others were wiped out of middle-age Europe). Contrast that with moslem countries where you have jews, christians, Zoroastrians... Or even better India where hinduism, jainism, buddhism, sikhism and ayyavazhi sometimes share the same temples.

  • by shanen ( 462549 ) on Monday May 25, 2009 @04:44AM (#28081079) Homepage Journal

    Are you a troll, or a sincere idiot?

    In either case, I feel compelled to say something nice about /., since the rating system left you invisible to me. I only stumbled across your post by the replies. If you're a troll, you're evidently a mighty troll.

    Unfortunately, I don't care. In either case, my only request is that you designate me as a foe so I'll have an even lower chance of seeing you in the future.

    My qualifications to be your foe? Well, first of all, I'm highly educated, including a degree in history. Second, I'm a highly devout agnostic, and I have nothing but contempt for people whose own religious beliefs are as weak and indefensible as yours. I could come up with more reasons, but you obviously have no interest in reason, and I've already wasted far more time than you're worth.

  • by easyTree ( 1042254 ) on Monday May 25, 2009 @08:03AM (#28081783)

    I am confused now... Who is right and who is wrong?

    They're all wrong. Contrary to popular belief, history is nonsense. We can't use it to learn to avoid future mistakes because noone can agree what actually happened; either through lack of information or deliberate re-writing of history.

    In my opinion, we should avoid constantly re-hashing the disputes about who's most correct on the subject of what happened n years ago and concentrate on trying to come to a collective agreement on what kind of world we want to live in.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 25, 2009 @11:45AM (#28084083)

    The early teletype code was BAUDOT, which had only 5-bits, limiting it to u/c.

    That doesn't make sense. The gp said that they were limited to either upper case or lower case and of the two they picked upper case because of the (probably apocryphal) need to avoid writing "god". You replied by saying that having only 5 bits limited them to upper case. But it obviously didn't - if there was room for upper then there would have been room for lower instead- someone chose between the two and picked upper case, just like the gp said.

Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky

Working...