Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Security Software IT

Adobe Gets Regular On Security Patches 38

dasButcher writes "Adobe joins Microsoft and Oracle on regularly scheduled security patch releases. The first set of patches for Acrobat and Reader are scheduled for today, and Adobe will release future patch batches quarterly."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Adobe Gets Regular On Security Patches

Comments Filter:
  • Only quarterly??? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by davidwr ( 791652 ) on Tuesday June 09, 2009 @09:36AM (#28264705) Homepage Journal

    Quarterly makes sense for non-security patches but for critical security patches I hope they go "off-cycle."

    For critical security vulnerabilities, I would like a beta patch OR workaround ASAP and a tested patch as soon as practical.

  • by jonwil ( 467024 ) on Tuesday June 09, 2009 @10:16AM (#28265239)

    The problem is all the crap Adobe has shoehorned into the PDF format like JavaScript and all those plugins. If PDF went back to what it should be, a document format with no extra crap, the problems will go away.

    PDF and Acrobat need to go back to a core focus on being a way to represent documents and other things in a way that looks the same no matter what OS, screen resolution or browser you are running and ditch all the extra garbage that has made Acrobat and Acrobat Reader so bloated.

  • by ThrowAwaySociety ( 1351793 ) on Tuesday June 09, 2009 @10:23AM (#28265339)

    kinkos can print word docs

    Printing a Word doc at Kinkos is like hiring chef Emeril Lagasse to serve you McDonalds food on a silver platter.

    If you're going all the way to Kinkos to print something professionally, you probably want some control over what the output is going to look like. Word gives you none. A Word document can look different on two computers running the same version of Windows and the same version of Word with the same fonts, just because your default printer is different.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 09, 2009 @10:23AM (#28265351)
    The phrases "real prepress work" and "Word docs" have no reason to ever appear anywhere near each other. It reminds me of a guy applying for a sysadmin job at Google saying "I know how to use Norton."
  • by geekmux ( 1040042 ) on Tuesday June 09, 2009 @10:46AM (#28265637)

    Ah, anyone remember the good ol' days of Adobe, when it was just a fucking reader??

    Sorry if I'm being crass, but a damn PDF reader should not be 100MB worth of installer followed up with 20MB "patches". Damn Adobe v5 installer was 5MB, and guess what? v5 does everything I need it to do, and would likely suffice for 95% of Adobe users who do nothing more than view PDFs.

    Everything else is going low-cal, low-carb, lite and dry, how about a simple PDF reader?

  • by geminidomino ( 614729 ) * on Tuesday June 09, 2009 @10:53AM (#28265751) Journal

    That glorified "doc reader" can do far more than you think, Adobe makes it possible to have a document in a file, with all of the features of a website.

    And that's a good thing... why,again? PDF is supposed to be a portable doc format for predictable, portable printing, not a blasted website.

  • Adobe? (Score:0, Insightful)

    by Oldav ( 533444 ) on Tuesday June 09, 2009 @09:45PM (#28274107)
    Dont use acrobat, Foxit reader is great, and is much less of a resource hog!

Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.

Working...