The Battle Between Google and Facebook 202
A story at Wired delves into the ongoing struggle between Google and Facebook to establish their competing visions for the future of the internet. "For the last decade or so, the Web has been defined by Google's algorithms — rigorous and efficient equations that parse practically every byte of online activity to build a dispassionate atlas of the online world. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg envisions a more personalized, humanized Web, where our network of friends, colleagues, peers, and family is our primary source of information, just as it is offline. In Zuckerberg's vision, users will query this 'social graph' to find a doctor, the best camera, or someone to hire — rather than tapping the cold mathematics of a Google search. It is a complete rethinking of how we navigate the online world, one that places Facebook right at the center. In other words, right where Google is now." A related article at ReadWriteWeb suggests that while Facebook's member base is enormous, the company hasn't taken advantage of its influence as well as it should have, though the capability for it to do so still exists.
Re:The Wired heuristic (Score:2, Funny)
A good general heuristic: plans exposed on Wired never come to fruition.
What would happen if you published this idea of yours on Wired?
Re:A step back perhaps? (Score:2, Funny)
Everyone's about the Goobook (Score:1, Funny)
But no one likes my idea of the Faceboogle. :-(
Re:Hey, has anyone heard from Roland? (Score:1, Funny)
Also, just in case you haven't heard ... [msn.com]
Re:Why not have both? (Score:4, Funny)
Your mother in law will be delighted to help .. (Score:5, Funny)
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg envisions a more personalized, humanized Web, where our network of friends, colleagues, peers, and family is our primary source of information, just as it is offline.
And those family members, friends and peers will be utterly delighted to become an integral part of your private life. Just imagine having your private questions forwarded to your least favorite family member (lets say, your mother-in-law)
And that's just one immediate drawback. Other posters have already listed various long-term problems (cultural stratification, deprecation of "outside" information, etc.)
All in all, its a profoundly dumb idea. The fact that some schmuck (excuse me, CEO) calls it "his vision for the internet" just illustrates the kind mental vacuum that accompanies plans like this one:
The Internet is too important to be in the hands of the CEOs
Re:Why not have both? (Score:3, Funny)
I saw it on the Tonight Show, the coming Facebook-Google-Twitter mashup will be called YouTwitFace.