Submitting a review for consideration is easy; please first read Slashdot's book review guidelines. Updated: 2008114 by samzenpus
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.
um...grats? (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm rather mystified that there's still interest in Yahoo. Although I'm aware that their hand-edited, directory-like coverage is actually popular in countries that use non-ascii character sets, Yahoo's search results haven't seemed competitive to me since '97.
Honestly, I'm not trying to troll; just wondering why a site that's stagnated for over 10 years now needs anything cutting-edge.
Anyone still using them? Have any insights why we ought to care what they're up to?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:um...grats? (Score:4, Insightful)
So turn on iGoogle [google.com], and display all the extra info that you want on your homepage...
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
igoogle is kind of the Firefox of search engines
With the free bonus of having everything you do tracked for someone elses profit.
You see what I like about firefox extensions is that they are really and truly working for me, they don't exist for the sole purpose of coaxing data out me for someone else.
Re: (Score:2)
With the free bonus of having everything you do tracked for someone elses profit.
You say that like it's a bad thing. IMHO, Google's web history makes it all worth while. Once or twice a month, I'll use web history to track down something that I didn't feel was wroth bookmarking at the time, but now feel a need to revisit, sometimes even years after the original sighting. I'm willing to let Google use my historical data, as long as I'm also allowed to use it. I don't have to worry about whether I saw something at home or at work, on a PC or my iPhone, on my current hardware or on a V
Re: (Score:2)
You say that like it's a bad thing.
It is a bad thing in my opinion. At the very least its certainly not to your benefit.
I'm willing to let Google use my historical data, as long as I'm also allowed to use it. I don't have to worry about whether I saw something at home or at work, on a PC or my iPhone, on my current hardware or on a VM that only lived three weeks two years ago; as long as I was logged into Google, it's all in the same data store and I can search it from any device with a web browser.
You real
Re: (Score:2)
You live in a stone age village in Afghanistan, right? Check out noscript and adblockplus for Firefox. This is the age of enlightenment. Enlightened people can be logged into iGoogle, and still block adsense and all the other crap they disapprove of. The class for "Weaponized Bronze" will be right after "Safer Spearchucking". Have a nice day, boys and girls.
Re: (Score:2)
Enlightened people can be logged into iGoogle, and still block adsense and all the other crap they disapprove of.
You sound like the sort of person who would by a car with an exploding engine and rationalize it by saying that as an enlightened person with a fire extinguisher and tool box you can keep it running the way you like.
An enlightened person would buy a car that works the way it ought to without constantly having to keep fighting fires.
The class for "Weaponized Bronze" will be right after "Safer Spea
Re: (Score:2)
Almost every car you see on America's highways have exploding engines.
Heh. Nice try to save it. But no, no they don't.
There is an important semantic difference between 'exploding engine' and 'internal combustion engine'. Just man up and admit it.
Besides the real point of my argument was that suggesting to use greasemonkey and adblock and noscript etc in order to make igoogle palatable to use is essentially admitting igoogle is anti-user. The smart thing to do is patronize services that aren't so offensive i
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
...people can be logged into iGoogle, and still block adsense and all the other crap they disapprove of.
You are logged into their servers. They don't need all that fancy javascript and other voodoo to track you. They know exactly who you are because you're sitting there screaming it at them. All they need to do is log it straight to your account.
Sure, AdSense on other sites might be blocked but anything you do on their servers while logged in is easily logged on their end.
Re: (Score:2)
Or conversely, go to Yahoo's search page [yahoo.com] and get the "clean" look.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Yahoo tends to be for people who want to be fed/entertained/informed by whatever's there on the table (say like a TV channel).
Of course I generalize.
Opinion: I'm sure, the answer to your question about who uses them is "A lot of people."
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Which is why a typical Google search returns 16 million hits.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
That comes down quite rapidly, though, once you start specifying things like her hair colour... ...or so I'm told...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I have 10 years worth of email on their servers.
POP3, anyone?
Not that you should abandon Yahoo Mail just because you can... I'm just saying them having your email archive is little deterrent.
Re: (Score:2)
Umm, Yahoo changed to a robot based crawler listing way back in 2002 for their main search results. Prior to that point, they had search engine results complimenting their directory.
In the past, they've used Inktomi (which they now own) as well as Google to power their searches. In 2003, they went to their own internal search engine.
Now that being said, they still maintain a web directory, but it has lost a lot of significance.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, I did notice your nad...
Re: (Score:2)
Anyone still using them?
I still have a Yahoo mail account catching spam for me. Does that count?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:um...grats? (Score:5, Insightful)
In fact, that mediocrity might actually be driving some of their hardware/facilities innovation. If you are kicking ass on the software side, getting favorable ad rates, lots of buzz keeping the investors happy no matter what your P/E is, etc. you can get away with some infrastructure inefficiency(under good management you will still work to reduce this; but not doing so is easier than doing so, and you'll survive). If, however, your buzz is gone, your ad rates are slipping, and you have sharks gnawing on your stock, you can't afford to run a sloppy operation. If your revenue per visitor is poor, catering to that visitor had better be damn cheap.
Now, if a company is too far gone, or under the influence of Wall street oriented buzzsaw management, they won't have the talent needed to innovate, having lost/sacked their R&D people, and it is game over; but if a company is on the ropes but not yet down, or if their margins are simply not very good, you might expect them to do some interesting infrastructure stuff. Dell would be another one I'd put in the category. Software/design stories about them tend to be a yawn, or an embarrassment(Adamo, WTF?) but their logistics and supply chain guys are probably all cyborg ninja assassins.
Parent
Re:um...grats? (Score:5, Insightful)
Hint: There's much more to do on the web than search, and thus Yahoo! (and Google) provide a lot more services than search.
Honestly, not trying to troll or flamebait, but are you really as ignorant as your posting makes you sound? Are you really too lazy to visit http://www.yahoo.com [yahoo.com] and spend a little time just reading the page and clicking around on the services offered?
I'm still using them because Google offers nothing to match the Yahoo! page I use as a homepage. (http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb [yahoo.com].) I still use Yahoo! mail for some functions as it's UI beats Gmail hands down. I still track my finances at Yahoo! because their management and analysis tools are superior to those provided by Google. I use Flickr because the collaboration and other tools it provides are superior to Picasa's. Etc... Etc...
Google's predominance in search and advertising blinds people to the 'also ran' status of so many of it's other services.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't see how it can be 'much more usable' given how straightforward the page I link to is. (Not to mention the page I link to is a sports page, not an entertainment page.)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't even comprehend your second statement. Are you unaware that iGoogle is essentially a pretty front-end to a bunch of RSS feeds, all chosen by the user? There can be as much or as little "media company" influence as you desire.
Re: (Score:2)
I still use Yahoo! mail for some functions as it's UI beats Gmail hands down.
Heretic!...Troll!... get off my third favourite website! ;)
Honestly, the only part of Yahoo that I personally cared about was Jumpcut. [jumpcut.com]
Flickr and games.yahoo.com (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I personally like http://finance.yahoo.com/ [yahoo.com] much better than http://finance.google.com/ [google.com]. The portfolio, quote and chart information is much better with yahoo.
Additionally, instant messaging. Why should I pick a platform/protocol/client that none of my friends or family use? I guess I could spend plenty of time getting them to switch, however, then they in turn have to convince their friends/family to convert as well.
Google is great at search, but beyond that.. not that much else attracts me to it from an a
Re: (Score:2)
Re:um...grats? (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm mystified by the "cheap hydro power from the Niagara River" part.
Since the story doesn't claim that they are funding the construction of a new hydro-electric dam, they are just saying 'well, we're close to a dam, so we'll claim that our power needs are clean, and you bastards further away, that were going to get this electricity if we didn't use it, you are using electricity from those ozone-destroying, greenhouse gas-generating, scarce fossil-fuel burning power plants'.
Why do we let companies get away with these stupid claims. Unless they actually are responsible for building the clean power source, they should be denied the ability to claim they are using so-called 'clean' energy just because they happen to be physically near a pre-existing 'clean' energy source.
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
There are lots of other services though. Yahoo auctions is extremely popular in Japan. I've never heard any
Re: (Score:2)
It seems more like you're trying to flame bait people.
I use several Yahoo services, I've forgotten about their directory system that you've brought up. Yellow pages is good, and I switch between them and Google for mapping & directions. I like the formatting of information in their finance section, though Google has the nifty chart applet, so I go between both services there.
Re: (Score:2)
Phew (Score:4, Funny)
For a moment there I panicked about a chicken coup trying to overtake Yahoo. Although chickens can not make it any worse for Yahoo than it already is.
The image of millions of chickens rising up against the tyranny of Yahoo and running around all excited is simply awesome. I, therefore, petition that Yahoo at least change the name to Chicken Coup if not go all the way to welcoming their new chicken overlords!
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
chickens in choppers?
Will this Yahoo idea live up to the hype? (Score:3, Interesting)
I certainly hope it does. You see, I have doubts on the viability of whatever Yahoo does. A company that shuts down three services in less than 8 months (Y!Live, Jumpcut and Maven Networks), you begin to wonder whether they know what they are doing.
On my mail account, Yahoo have decided to make it more bloated with Facebook/Twitter like services while requiring money to mark more than 500 addresses as spam addresses. By the way, you cannot redirect mail from a Yahoo account or access it via POP3 without shelling out cash. Insane with the likes of free Gmail out there.
I have also noticed that Yahoo search is capturing any invalid URLs I enter into the Google search page...adding to my agony and dislike of the company. If I want to search, I know where to go. Bottom line, Yahoo do not know what they are doing in my not so humble opinion.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Lockport (Score:5, Informative)
Lockport is where the Erie Canal climbs the Niagara Escarpment.
The canal itself was and is a source of hydro-power - think of it as a 350 mile nineteenth century industrial corridor cut across upstate New York. The work of self-taught engineers and Irish immigrant labor - with no better tools available than the pick axe and black powder.
Lockport is a small city of about 20,000 that has been spared the frauds and fancies that have plagued the redevelopment of Niagara Falls. It is about 16 miles northeast of the SUNY Amherst campus.
WTF? (Score:3, Funny)
Chicken or the Eggs? (Score:2)
Hey, I was just in a massive data center yesterday for a tour. (100,000 sq ft) They had a spare s390 sitting on the side of the room. Maybe Y! can borrow that baby and put on a few hundred linux and/or windows VMs...
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Lockport is more for meth heads. There are lots of GM workers there with a lot of free time and the extra cash from their union pay scale leaves them with many recreational options.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
DC is 6.5 hours away if you drive a Mustang and go down 219 through central PA. :)