An anonymous reader writes
"Researchers from ETH Zurich have recently managed to create an optical transistor from a single molecule in what is yet another important achievement on the road to quantum computing. The molecule itself is about 2 nanometers in size, much smaller than standard transistors, which means that a lot more could be integrated in a single chip. Dr. Hwang, lead author of the academic paper, said, 'Our single-molecule optical transistor generates almost negligible amount of heat. When a single molecule absorbs one photon, there is some probability (quantum yield) that the molecule emits a photon out. The rest of the energy absorbed turns into heat in the matrix. For the case of the specific hydrocarbon molecule that we use, the quantum yield is near 100%. So almost no heat is generated.'"
Negligible amount of heat... (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Leaping? (Score:2)
If there's one thing I've learned... (Score:3, Informative)
The good news... (Score:4, Funny)
We've made a quantum optical transistor out of a single molecule!
The bad news is that the single molecule masses about 2.4 tonnes. Yeah, it's a pretty big molecule. And don't scuff it, either. We don't want to brush any carbon atoms off the surface.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
We've made a quantum optical transistor out of a single molecule!
The bad news is that the single molecule masses about 2.4 tonnes. Yeah, it's a pretty big molecule. And don't scuff it, either. We don't want to brush any carbon atoms off the surface.
That's quite possible, you know. Bowling balls are single molecules. Almost any macromolecule can be made arbitrarily large with cross linking.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Bowling Balls are not single molecules. They are constructed with a weighted core surrounded by a polymer resin.
However, pure crystals are technically very large molecules. And they can get very large.
Re: (Score:2)
Bowling Balls are not single molecules. They are constructed with a weighted core surrounded by a polymer resin.
However, pure crystals are technically very large molecules. And they can get very large.
Okay, I was thinking of old rubber balls. Still, in more modern balls the resin is a single molecule.
Leakage (Score:5, Interesting)
do quantum transistors suffer from leakage? if so, while this is an excellent piece of engineering on it's own, it's pretty useless in practice as any data would just get lost in the fudge.
Everything in the article focused on the heat loss, energy efficiency and potential throughput, but no reasons were specifically given as to why this would succeed where Electronic processors have broken down other than 'Photons are beter than Electrons'.
How close can these new transistors get before they start contaminating each other's states?
Would these not be more suceptable to outside interference (Stray cosmic rays, shining a torch on it?)
Okay, maybe not the shining a torch on it. But if a single molecule transistor is hit by a stray photon, it *will* affect it's state surely. If so are they going to have abour 20 transistors doing the calculations and matching them for discrepencies?
The article raises more questions than it answers. Maybe I just don't know enough about quantum computing, but I'd like the answers all the same.
Re:Leakage (Score:5, Informative)
do quantum transistors suffer from leakage? if so, while this is an excellent piece of engineering on it's own, it's pretty useless in practice as any data would just get lost in the fudge.
Well leakage in electronic circuits comes from current flowing through the semiconductor while it is in an "off" state. Quantum photonics doesn't deal with current (or even electricity), so there would not be the same kind of leakage. I'm not aware of a comparable phenomenon specific to quantum states, but I'm just an EE, so some physicist might prove me wrong.
Everything in the article focused on the heat loss, energy efficiency and potential throughput, but no reasons were specifically given as to why this would succeed where Electronic processors have broken down other than 'Photons are beter than Electrons'. How close can these new transistors get before they start contaminating each other's states? Would these not be more suceptable to outside interference (Stray cosmic rays, shining a torch on it?)
Okay, maybe not the shining a torch on it. But if a single molecule transistor is hit by a stray photon, it *will* affect it's state surely. If so are they going to have abour 20 transistors doing the calculations and matching them for discrepencies?
First of all, photons are better than electrons for the reason I gave above, and because all of our long-distance and high data-rate information transmission is already optical. Instead of going from light to silicon and back, sticking with light reduces latency. It also improves efficiency, as the photon's energy is harnessed to perform the switching.
As for interference, if the molecule only responds to photons, shielding it from outside photons is trivial. It's called a box. I also get the impression FTA that the output of the transistor is well controlled, meaning that interference could be minimized or removed completely very easily.
The article raises more questions than it answers. Maybe I just don't know enough about quantum computing, but I'd like the answers all the same.
When has any quick article about a new tech breakthrough given all the answers?
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
As for interference, if the molecule only responds to photons, shielding it from outside photons is trivial. It's called a box. I also get the impression FTA that the output of the transistor is well controlled, meaning that interference could be minimized or removed completely very easily.
Of course, any meaningful computer will have more than thousands of these transistors, and surrounding every transistor with a box is far from practical. And, consider, once you shrink a box down to nanometer sizes, it will become leaky.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, in this case we're talking about lasers traveling through a crystal and being turned on and off with another laser. Unlike electrons and holes in a semiconductor (which drift and move around, causing leakage current), lasers travel in a straight line until they are made to change direction. The laser paths could even cross without interfering with each other.
The only issue I can imagine is scattering, due to dust (practically non-existent in cleanroom manufacturing of this quality) or the transisto
Glowing processors! (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Well glowy computer parts are cool but I would rather have an optical router and network cards. Fiber to the home.
Re: (Score:2)
Fiber to the home
You'll get your fiber to your home in a few years but your internet speed will still be locked at 10/10Mbps. The rest of the bandwidth will be used for pay-per-view and other services as deemed by your local monopoly. O and you'll still be using ipv4 because it would cost a little money upgrade to 6 and they wouldn't want you to have more than 1 IP anyhow, at least not without spending $400 on a business account. O and No static addresses ether... And port 80 among others will still be filtered. It's all fo
Re: (Score:2)
10/10Mbps?
10/0.5Mbps surely...
Re: (Score:2)
I had fiber (FiOS) at my home three years ago, port 80 was the only port blocked to my house and I had 40/10Mbps. When I switched to business (since I actually was attempting to run a hosting business out of my home and needed the 5 static IP addresses) it was only an extra $80 a month plus I increased my speed to 50/20Mbps. It was reliable, very fast, and cheap for the bandwidth provided compared to the other options (cable was something like 5/0.5Mbps for the same price as 40/10Mbps FiOS and DSL was even
Re: (Score:2)
Nah. WiMAX routers will be at $100 a piece, reaching over 20 miles, and you will have a network with all the other WiMAX routers, giving you a failsafe, multirouting, and encrypted (to the server) connection for "free" (except for the power and the router itself).
Maybe some will offer a city backbone, to reduce the hops to the next major CIX node.
Re: (Score:2)
Yea, good luck with the fiber to the home. I have a nice fiber right up to my cabinet on the side of my house.. no one in town will use it. ATT Uverse still wants to use copper. Idiots. Of course Verizon can't come in because it's an ATT area. Frankly Competition sucks for FTTH. So I'm stuck with cable.. which isn't too bad I guess "16/2" but they could do more over the fiber. They don't have any plans either.
Now as far as Quantum Computing goes.. I know about enough to fill a molecule with room for a large
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
okay it could but:
1. you would have to be entangled
2. make sure noone observes you seeing the photon
3. Don't make any sort of measurement or acknowledge that you saw the photon
Otherwise you could either see the light from the processor or the processor would work properly...it couldn't do both.
you could call it vaporware (Score:2)
but only because some of the photon bombardment results in actual vaporization of the technology in question
so we need a new word, in regards to nanotech, for the traditional connotation of vaporware meaning technology that is announced but will not be realized. something that has nanotech connotations
hmmm. perhaps sevenofnineware. because you most certainly are out of that league
Mass production? (Score:2)
The Law of Accelerating Returns, (Score:2, Interesting)
"Alien Technology" (Score:2)
Hehehe... this incredible stuff gets me thinking about theories related to Area-51 and technologies from crashed extra-terrestrial alien spacecraft and stuff. Go back in your mind as few as 25 years ago (if you are old enough) and imagine how you would have reacted if such technologies emerged at that time "out of the blue."? I think the reaction would be quite startling. Hell, even 25 years ago there were some pretty amazing developments and the like. But this is pretty awesome stuff. I'm still waitin
300x smaller than the wavelength? (Score:2)
I'm probably being dense here, but I'd really appreciate anyone who can explain how this can possibly work given that the wavelength of light is many hundreds of times longer than 2nm? I read the article and was none the wiser. Given the mention of quantum mechanics, is this related to wave/particle duality? That is, this detects the light particle irrelevant of the wavelength?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Photonical engineering (Score:4, Informative)
Parent
Re:Photonical engineering (Score:4, Interesting)
Parent
Re:Photonical engineering (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Photonical engineering (Score:4, Insightful)
Well, do you have a detailed understanding of the equations involved in avalanche breakdown of semiconductors and so on?
But it doesn't matter. You just plug in the appropriate zener diode, or transistor or whatever, that do things in a certain way, that we can understand, but how or why it behaves that way, we don't need to know in order to use it effectively.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Loads of stuff can be used with relatively limited knowledge, which is great; but that doesn't obviate the need for the knowledge of how they work.
Re: (Score:2)
...Yes, specialization marches on as the key to technological advances.
Re:Photonical engineering (Score:5, Insightful)
Education isn't about learning every detail about the job you're going to do about graduation. At least a good education isn't. A good college will give you a strong background in an area you wish to pursue, a strong work ethic, but most importantly, it will teach you how to learn. A modern education's primary goal must be to teach the students how to look up and assimilate information on their own.
When you hit an issue at your job, you don't just run to a more experienced co-worker anymore (which was the standard behavior 20 years ago). You look it up online, you read and learn from what you find, then you make a simple project to test out what you've learned. Beyond the very basics of your profession, those are the skills that matter most because those are the skills that produce results when no one else has the answers.
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
You look it up online, you read and learn from what you find, then you make a simple project to test out what you've learned.
It is extremely sad how many "developers" can't do this very thing.
TNT
Re: (Score:2)
Does anyone know when this science will be taught in universities?
My university has a Photonics concentration within the Electrical Engineering degree program.
As for learning this kind of cutting-edge stuff, that would happen in a graduate or post-grad program, just like any field.
Re: (Score:2)
I think electronics will be the past in less than 20 years.
I'm very curious to know what you mean by that statement.
Re:OK, so clue me in (Score:4, Informative)
either:
a: the photon is released has a longer wavelength and thus less energy.
b: the rate is "nearly" 100%, as in sometimes it absorbs a photon and produces heat.
Parent
Re:OK, so clue me in (Score:4, Informative)
If one photon is absorbed and one emitted where does the heat energy come from. The molecule must be absorbing more than one photon, or is it also being "powered" so that the absorbtion can take place?
I think he's saying that the molecule either releases a photon or heat is generated. In this case there is a high probability that for the photon release, so heat generation is rare.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Heat is an electromagnetic phenomenon, so wouldn't that involve a released photon as well?
No, heat is a form of energy. Electromagnetic radiation is also a form of energy. You can convert energy from one form to the other, such as heating an object by shining light on it, or that same object radiating visible light when it gets hot enough, but they aren't the same phenomenon.
Re: (Score:2)
Do you know what "there is some probability" means?
Hint, it doesn't mean "always".
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
He, if the K stands for thousands then the number is a unit-less quantity, thus making your snarky comment unintelligible. So, where did you go to school? :-p
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Don't worry. Something tells me you're not quite the target audiance at this point ;)
Re: (Score:2)
It's a transistor, not an amplifier.