New Zealand Creates Safety Billboard That Bleeds When It Rains 137
Posted
by
samzenpus
from the when-it-rains-it-gores dept.
from the when-it-rains-it-gores dept.
Officials in Papakura, New Zealand have come up with a billboard that bleeds when it rains. They hope it will encourage drivers to slow down when the weather makes conditions dangerous. Since the billboards have been erected, there hasn't been a fatal accident in the area.
Zero of nothing (Score:5, Insightful)
Since the billboards have been erected, there hasn't been a fatal accident in the area.
Of course, being New Zealand, since the billboard was erected there have not been any cars there either.
I'd be too busy (Score:2, Insightful)
How Long? (Score:5, Insightful)
Until someone crashes while gawking at the bleeding billboards?
Re:Zero of nothing (Score:4, Insightful)
Thats really a small number though that could depend on multiple variables. How do we know that the same amount of cars passed through it? For all we know there could have been a road that was under construction that people use now. Also did the road get any more improvements? What about weather? There would be a big difference if last year there were lots of storms. Etc.
"Small" is entirely relative. Granted that road improvements, construction, weather, etc. could have affected numbers. (Freakish weather is less "variable" than the presence of bleeding billboards.) You are correct that there aren't enough data to do a thorough statistical analysis, but you seem to be grasping at straws. From 14 to 0 could be very statistically significant depending on the standard deviation from year-to-year and the elimination of outside influence. Just because 14 is "small" compared to your local Interstate exit doesn't mean that it's negligible for this stretch of NZ highway.
"TFA" is worthless, but speculating on potential spikes in common, relatively flat variables should not eliminate the speculation on effects of observable variation in very prominent and very uncommon variables. Put more simply, and in a car analogy, if you install a set of used tires and 2 blow out during your normal commute home, look first at your tires and then at potential anomalies in the road.
Plus, for all we know, most of those 14 deaths could have happened with one or two cars.
OK, if you're in NZ (or really pretty much anywhere but India) 14 people in "one or two" cars would be a lot. 14 people in my car (or most any car) would require opening the sun-roof and me meeting a bunch of midgets. If you're going to pedant statistics, refrain from speculating on obvious outliers. 14 deaths in a 1-car wreck on a NZ highway? *Scoff*
Correlation is not causation (Score:5, Insightful)
Why should we accept that the rain causes the billboard to bleed? Perhaps the bleeding of the billboard causes the rain...
Re:Rain isn't causing those accidents (Score:3, Insightful)
Amusing although more than half (66%) of the world's population actually does drive on the left but that is besides the point.
Population of people, or of cars?
No fair counting India where the number of people greatly exceeds the number of cars -- vehicles per capita is 12 out of 1000 versus the US where it is 765 per 1000. [nationmaster.com]
Re:Zero of nothing (Score:2, Insightful)
Knock it off. Just use "data" as a singular noun like everybody else.
Re:In the U.S. (Score:3, Insightful)
Can you please explain the difference?