Airborne Laser Successfully Tracks, Hits Missile 287
fructose writes "The Airborne Laser managed to acquire, track, and illuminate a test missile a few days ago. According to the press release, the Boeing plane 'used its infrared sensors to find a target missile launched from San Nicolas Island, Calif ... issued engagement and target location instructions to the beam control/fire control system ... fired its two solid-state illuminator lasers to track the target and ... fired a surrogate high-energy laser at the target, simulating a missile intercept.' The sensors on board the missile confirmed the 'hit.' Michael Rinn, ABL's program director, said, 'Pointing and focusing a laser beam on a target that is rocketing skyward at thousands of miles per hour is no easy task, but the Airborne Laser is uniquely able to do the job.' The next steps will be to test the high-power laser at full strength in flight and do a complete system test later this year. Its success or failure will determine whether the project gets canceled. Looks like the Real Genius fans out there are finally living the dream."
Re:How does it aim? (Score:4, Insightful)
The laser optics in the airborne laser probably have to be made out of narrow band reflectors which in practice can be made more than 99.999% reflective to a laser. It would be easy to slightly change the laser wavelength and optics (a few nm's perhaps) and the missile would absorb again.
Re:okay well... (Score:4, Insightful)
Doesn't matter, apparently. The total amount of energy in the laser overheats the reflective surface long before a significant amount of the light is reflected. One of the problems of aiming high powered lasers is that the mirrors that guide the beam melt.
Shoot it down (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:How does it aim? (Score:3, Insightful)
I think this is one of those "why don't they build the entire plane out of the black box material" questions.
Odds are that high-performance mirror glass is extremely expensive, heavy, and fragile. Similarly, it's difficult to keep something clean when blasting through the atmosphere at 1000mph.
Re:How does it aim? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:How does it aim? (Score:4, Insightful)
you can always track a missile optically, or via infra red, or.. etc.
as for 'pointed in the right direction fast enough'... see Phalanx and Goalkeeper systems for some seriously-fast-aiming systems. As long as you can track the missile itself*, you can aim something at it. Lasers come with an advantage over the above systems... the laser tends to travel in a fairly straight line, bullets.. not so much. Even with atmospheric distortions, you should get much better aim with a laser than with bullets.
* As for tracking a missile - keep in mind that this system is intended to be used from some distance. Tracking a missile going 'thousands of miles per hour' just means having to rotate the system (fractions) of degrees. Think of regular ol' human camera operators tracking the space shuttle, which goes much faster than a typical missile, and having no problems doing so. It becomes easier the further away it is, in fact. (well, easiest is when it's still sitting on the launch pad, but you get the idea.)
Re:How does it aim? (Score:3, Insightful)
Eventually this is going to stop being the way we work, I hope. We could also think outside the box: put more resources into improving things for other human beings on the planet. Yes, we need to defend ourselves against REAL threats, and the biggest strength the U.S. has at its disposal is the good will we manage to generate by helping others and spreading wealth and peace in the world.
Re:okay well... (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't trust the source of this story (Score:5, Insightful)
Wouldn't Boeing have a lot of incentive to hype this to ensure that the contract got renewed for further research? It's possible that they set the bar for success so low and/or made the experiment so contrived that they couldn't help but achieve it.
Re:Countermeasures (Score:4, Insightful)
So how will this anti-ICBM technology be used against a terrorist carrying these suitcase a-bombs that are said to exist?
The problem is, ss soon as we get a 100% effective missile shield, enemies will find a way to deliver nuclear armaments. It wouldn't even be that hard. They can just park a ship off a Manhattan and light one off if they wanted to.
This whole idea of shooting down missiles is a waste of fucking time and money. If we gave the money we were spending on this bullshit to the countries to foster good will, we'd be a lot better off.
Re:Countermeasures (Score:3, Insightful)
They can just park a ship off a Manhattan and light one off if they wanted to.
Ships move at 20-30mph. Ballistic missiles move at 15,000mph +. If we make it so that our enemies have to get a ship into one our harbors, it becomes a much simpler problem. We would need to have more Coast Guard people to basically board every ship, with neutron detectors, but, its something we can do. We can track ships as they are approaching the USA, track them as they leave ports, follow them, and pretty much monitor every boat on the ocean.
Re:Countermeasures (Score:3, Insightful)
We can track ships as they are approaching the USA, track them as they leave ports, follow them, and pretty much monitor every boat on the ocean.
We can? [bbc.co.uk]
Re:There is an even easier work around (Score:3, Insightful)
Actually, this is one of the reasons laser weapons are being developed. It's much cheaper to shoot lasers at a bunch of decoys instead of missiles costing >1e6$ apiece.
Also, weapons like the ABL can be used to shoot at missiles during the boost phase, before decoys can be deployed.
And, the best defence against a full scale nuclear attack by the Russians is deterrence. The ABL is meant more for use against tinpot dictators firing Scuds.
Re:We do this enough... (Score:4, Insightful)
Do you work hard to be this wrong?
The Germans have soldiers in in Afghanistan.
If you want an oil leaking POS british car feel free to buy one. If I wanted that kinda junk I would by a GM vehicle. I buy cars not from folks I like, but from people who build good cars. This is called capitalism, you should check it out it is a great system.
You are a fool if you think we have "friends", or if we should give those folks free money. The system you propose is no more than a hair's breadth from corporatism. Your appeals to nationalism are would make Mussolini proud.
I surely hope this is not the view center-right in this country.
Re:There is an even easier work around (Score:3, Insightful)
At $1e6 apiece, your supply of missiles is going to be constrained. A single warship, for instance, easily has $100 million worth of missiles on board; ISTR stories of a few years ago when the US Navy had problems buying enough missiles for all their ships. The same goes for anti-ICBM missiles.
Production is also a problem: when you expend your entire production run of missiles (iirc this happened in Gulf War 1) you'd have to wait months for new ones to be manufactured. A laser can easily be recharged.
Re:We do this enough... (Score:3, Insightful)
You might try looking into the body count of Iraqi civilians. That and the little fact that we have now setup them up to have a fun civil war.