Submitting a review for consideration is easy; please first read Slashdot's book review guidelines. Updated: 2008114 by samzenpus
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.
ego (Score:5, Insightful)
Random person thinks he knows everything, grows an ego and tells "juicy" stuff to press to boost that said ego while actually knowing nothing.
Nothing to see here. But I suspect lots of Linux/Mac OSX fanatics will be coming in 3.. 2.. 1..
Reply to This
Re:ego (Score:5, Funny)
I suspect lots of Linux/Mac OSX fanatics will be coming in 3.. 2.. 1..
I came as fast as I could! Just let me get my breath back and I'll start bashing whoever the bad guy is in the story! Who is it today? MacDonalds? Apple? Microsoft? Jack Thompson?
Reply to This
Parent
Re:ego (Score:5, Insightful)
For every Off-topic mod you get, you'll be almost guaranteed one Insightful mod. As long as you're against Jack Thompson. Which I am!
Reply to This
Parent
Re:ego (Score:4, Insightful)
Jack Thompson as Ronald McDonald would be scary.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:ego (Score:5, Funny)
..0 ....
OMGBBQ!!!!! Gnome is bettar than both!!!!! and anyway it all comes from PARC work blah blah GEM blah blah Amiga blah
Reply to This
Parent
Re:ego (Score:5, Funny)
Maybe it's a KDE user who did it.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:ego (Score:5, Funny)
I doubt a KDE user would do it, they'd have to spend too long looking through the huge array of buttons and options that do similar things in order to just be at the end of desperation, push one of them in the hope it does the right thing.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:ego (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Save face? (Score:5, Insightful)
They ain't trying to save face. They are trying to save a lawsuit loss (i.e., money).
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Save face? (Score:4, Interesting)
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Except Apple's look and feel lawsuit against Microsoft has already been thrown out. About 20 years ago. So Microsoft can copy "look and feel" all they want, they have the legal precedents to do so.
Uhhh... no. According to Wikipedia [wikipedia.org], Apple won because the court ruled that:
"Apple cannot get patent-like protection for the idea of a graphical user interface, or the idea of a desktop metaphor [under copyright law]."
and, that (and this is a Wikipedia quote):
"The court established that Apple could not make copyri
Re:Save face? (Score:4, Informative)
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
He's not really that random, he's the "partner group manager with Microsoft", LinkedIn says he's the SMB & Distribution Director at Microsoft Ltd [linkedin.com]. He's kinda high up there, and in my opinion that's a huge slip, to say on record your company took inspiration from your main competitor. Can you imagine how bad it would sound if Chevy said "We wanted the look and feel of the Ford Mustang when we created the new Camaro". I'd be surprised if he wasn't looking fo
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Why would they even bother to deny it? It's not like they tried to deny their Microsoft store inspiration. If anything, they were being blatant about their inspiration.
OS X does have a nice UI. If they did take some Win 7 ideas from OS X to improve Windows, then I think they did a decent balancing job between outright copying, and failing miserably. That said, they should have paid more attention to details past the first layer of the UI. There are still far too many obscure clicks or info overload to get t
Re:ego (Score:5, Funny)
http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2009/10/30/ [penny-arcade.com]
Reply to This
Parent
Re:ego (Score:5, Funny)
so did xkcd. [xkcd.com]
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Put aside the ego... (Score:4, Informative)
Don't try to bullshit the rest of us. Windows gets shoved down our collective throats so we can't help but have experience with it. This isn't like MacOS where you're only ever going to have experience with it if you explicitly seek it out.
Need encryption? Try using a tool that explicitly ensures it. There is even a "checkbox" for it.
Reply to This
Parent
Things not to do if you like your job (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Re:Things not to do if you like your job (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Things not to do if you like your job (Score:5, Funny)
In my defense, that mop was a slut
Reply to This
Parent
What Apple does right (Score:5, Interesting)
Apple and Microsoft attack the problem of user interface from two completely different points of view. Microsoft wants things to be orthogonal, logical, menu driven, hierarchical, and otherwise fully featured. Apple takes the approach that the user doesn't want to fuss with all sorts of menus and submenus (no two button mouse for years!) and just wants to do what they need as simply as possible. So you end up with two completely different interfaces.
Apple's interface is elegant but inflexible. Everything fits into the existing scheme and runs perfectly within that scheme.
Windows' interface is flexible but clumsy. While this has gotten much better in later versions, we're still looking at deeply nested menus, and applications which do not necessarily have any UI themes in common with each other.
However the key point is that Microsoft is gradually becoming more user-centric. As far as that goes in their own perspective. They are making changes to the OS that were implemented in Mac years ago, and now that they are here, they make Windows a better product.
Aesthetics is a major theme with Apple, and it is one that Microsoft hadn't fully embraced until Vista. Listen to the users. Let the users tell you what is good and bad. Build the interface to match the user.
In a sense, the MS employee was right. Microsoft is doing a lot to emulate Apple. And frankly, it's about time.
Reply to This
Re:What Apple does right (Score:4, Insightful)
One of the problems OS X has is that it lacks the ability to use these menus through the keyboard easily. In Windows I can hit the Alt key, and quickly see all the menus I can open by using an other key (the letter used for the menu item will have an underscore). Such as Alt + F is the file menu.
Each menu item then can be accessed usually through an access key. So Alt - F - S would be save. I know in both Windows and Mac OS X you have direct save short cuts too, and you can configure short cuts to common items, but that's not I want.
What I want is to be able to access a menu list from the keyboard quickly while exploring, not remember various different short cuts.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:What Apple does right (Score:4, Informative)
One of the problems OS X has is that it lacks the ability to use these menus through the keyboard easily
Remembering the shortcuts on Macs is usually easier because they are consistent (ignoring the three different ways I have of making Apple's video-playing apps run full screen, and the fourth way that VLC uses). On Windows, an entire key on the keyboard is reserved for going to the menu bar. This is something that most users don't do - they either click on the menu with the mouse or hit shortcuts directly - and so on OS X is a chord. By default, it's control-F2, but it's configurable in System Preferences, so if you want it to be something easier to hit then you can change it.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:What Apple does right (Score:5, Informative)
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
This is Control-F2 on OS X. This selects the menu and allows to browse it with the cursor keys.
Alt+character has always been the way to type various special characters and ligatures on the Mac. Wasting this for another way to access menu entries instead was never an option for an OS that grew up with DTP.
Re:What Apple does right (Score:4, Informative)
Definitely sounds like person who has only used a Mac on occasion. I used to think like you about it until I actually used a Mac for a while. Actually I find OS X and most OS X applications to be more keyboard-friendly than Windows. Every single command you use frequently has or can be assigned a command-something combination (or control-something). So things like open, close, print, save are always assigned the same command key sequence across all apps. That's a time saver right there. Why alt-f-s when command-s will do? While most Windows users will actually click on file->save to save their document, very few Mac users I've seen bother with clicking on the menus for most common tasks; it's all done with the keyboard.
As was said earlier in the discussion, OS X and Windows come from very different philosophies. You speak of how you want to explore the menu. On OS X that's absolutely wrong. If you have to explore the menu to find something, then someone screwed up. Deep, nested menus are considered bad on OS X. Besides, alt-something-something-something reminds me of emacs!
There are many inconsistencies in OS X that are legitimate grievances. But not being able to alt-something-something-something the menu doesn't appear to me to be that important. I'm far more frustrated on a daily basis by how OS X eats the click that focuses a window (now I use command-tab and command-` to focus windows anyway without the mouse), that you have enable keyboard navigation in dialog boxes as it's off by default, and that carbon and cocoa apps behave so differently.
Both systems have their inconsistencies, and both are getting better in this regard. And from what I can tell from using Windows 7, Windows is getting more usable and mac-like all the time.
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Right click? What is this right click you speak of?
Re:What Apple does right (Score:4, Informative)
System Prefs > Mouse & Keyboard > Keyboard shortcuts*.
A quick look tells me that CTRL-F2 puts focus on the menubar, CTRL-F3 places focus on the Dock, etc etc. OSX has had this since (someone correct if i'm wrong) since at least 10.2 .
So, that's about enough of this "can't navigate in OSX without the mouse" propaganda. [/wishful thinking]
* Apologies if the wording isn't exact as i'm translating from the italian.
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Which is slower, as I mentioned in a reply to another poster who brought this up.
Might not be important to some people, but to me, it's a feature I miss in Mac OS X land.
Re:What Apple does right (Score:4, Insightful)
users. Let the users tell you what is good and bad. Build the interface to match the user.
The interesting thing here is that your evidence doesn't match the examples.
Microsoft puts every single thing they do in front of users, and tests it to death. Apple puts some really smart, good designers in a room and they do what they think is best. (overly simplified, but you get the idea)
One of the first things Jobs did when he came to Apple was to kill the UI research group. They have a unified, attractive and logical interface because they keep it tightly controled and don't let groups of just anyone come in and tell them to change things. They're also secretive to the point of paranoia, which means they'd never be able to do user testing groups before launch of anything.
Microsoft is bland because every single thing they do is tested over and over and over again with user groups, which gives them a lot of data, but means they end up with the lowest common denominator on everything.
You can make your own decision on which is better.
I actually read something that made the case that Microsoft was too consumer focussed. This is around the time when MS had just got the security religion and the person said that until then, nobody was asking for security in their focus groups and market research, just features and compatibility with older software. Geeks were asking for security, but they made up a relatively small number of people in the market. When worms,viri and root-kits and all that started being more and more prevelent, people started asking for security, and so MS started doing security.
Short version: Ask your users what they need all you want, but you're always going to be a reactive organization, and you're never going to surprise anyone, because they'll always just get what they ask for. If you make educated guesses what they need, you'll sometimes blow them away with something awesome.
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
So, what you're basically saying is that Apple designs their interfaces to be intuitive, and Microsoft... doesn't.
Yup, that pretty much covers it.
But to be fair, you have to remember that Microsoft wasn't originally targeting yuppy thirty-somthethings and college students, they were going for business programmers and well, nerds. This is a completely different audience than Apple, and frankly, they hit the mark. Nerds don't want intuitive. Nerds want it the way they want it. This kind of interface is great
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
So? (Score:5, Insightful)
We are living in a twisted, perverted world, where one can't express an opinion without being beheaded by both the press and the company he's working for. God help us all!
Reply to This
Hi (Score:5, Funny)
I'm a Mac and Windows 7 was MY idea
Reply to This
employee who 'inaccurate and uninformed' (Score:4, Insightful)
Reply to This
Hello Streisand (Score:4, Insightful)
But anyway, considering that Apple has put a huge amount of effort into streamlining their OS and making it more responsive to the user, just in general I think that's a good thing to emulate in your OS. For example, I can remember waiting on 10.0 and 10.1 for what seemed like eternities for the spinning beach ball to quit but that's gotten a lot better with recent releases. (Don't get me started on if you were trying to log onto an ftp server that wasn't responding.)
Reply to This
This is not like OS X! (Score:5, Funny)
Microsoft has issued an official rebuttal: "We never used OS X as a source of inspiration in the design of Windows 7. This is completely uninformed. We used KDE 4 instead".
Reply to This
As reported on by zdnet australia (Score:4, Insightful)
"We never used OS X as a source of inspiration in the design of Windows 7. This is completely uninformed. We used KDE 4 instead".
That's not far from the truth.
Or at least, if you tell people KDE4 is Windows 7, they believe it [zdnet.com.au].
Reply to This
Parent
Ideas don't occur in a vacuum (Score:4, Insightful)
Reply to This
Look and Feel (Score:3, Interesting)
Considering Apple's litigious nature and the fact that it once sued Microsoft for allegedly infringing on the MacOS "look and feel", I can easily see why Microsoft would want to distance itself from this guy's statements. Apple has always wanted to have exclusive rights over Mac-like graphical interfaces, damn the negative consequences to the rest of the industry.
This guy's statements are fodder for Apple's bloodthirsty lawyers. Should it turn out he's lying about Microsoft's intentions, firing him would seem to be the best course of action.
Reply to This
Someone got called out (Score:3, Insightful)
So some clueless employee in a company of tens of thousands of employees made a comment on the record. If this was an employee on one of the design teams, and it was a comment in an email to their manager and said email leaked, there would be a story and a lawsuit. However it wasn't, it just happened to be conjecture by someone that pulled their comment out of their ass.
The employee should have known better to make such a comment to begin with and is likely now /very/ aware of Microsoft's press policy.
What the employee did was no different from a factory worker for Ford that spends their day driving new cars into the parking lot making a comment about the design inspiration for the F-150. To be frank, I'll be surprised if the employee doesn't get fired, they certainly have cause.
Reply to This
Re:they've been copying Mac all along... (Score:5, Insightful)
So Mac copied Xerox Star, and Windows Copied Mac? Do you know who copied whom for OS/2, Amegia Workbench, NeXT, Linux, BeOS, and GeoWorks; all of which have similar WIMP interfaces?
It would be silly to say that any (other than STAR) evolved in a vacuum; but "borrowing ideas" has happened in every direction.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:they've been copying Mac all along... (Score:5, Interesting)
If you ever saw the Triumph of the Nerds documentary by Bob Cringely, you'd have seen Steve Jobs saying [youtube.com] "Picasso had a saying Good artists copy, great artists steal. And we have always been shameless in stealing great ideas."
Of course, in the same documentary he also says [youtube.com] "The only problem with Microsoft is that they just have no taste" :)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:If this is true... (Score:5, Insightful)
Windows 7 is still clunky, slow, and unstable.
Citation needed. I use Windows 7 and it's certainly not one of those.
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Windows 7 is still clunky, slow, and unstable.
Citation needed. I use Windows 7 and it's certainly not one of those.
Which one of them is it not?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Then they did a terrible job copying OSX. Windows 7 is still clunky, slow, and unstable. It's nothing like OSX at all.
I threw Win7 onto my MacBook Pro via BootCamp for work reasons and it's running fine. Heck, I even managed to get the 64-bit version running on it without any issues.
I've had no crashes and it feels a little speedier than Vista. So far it's looking like it's not a bad release.
Now I don't get the OSX and Win7 comparison, they don't look that much alike.
Re:If only.... (Score:5, Informative)
Ummm... Windows Vista and onwards is more secure out of the box. I mean, Mac OS X hasn't even really implemented ASLR yet. That Mac OS X is more secure is a common misconception.
Read this: http://www.tomshardware.com/news/hack-windows-security-snow-leopard,8704.html [tomshardware.com]
Charlier Miller [wikipedia.org] covers why he thinks Windows is more secure than Mac OS X.
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Firewire.
Apple Desktop Bus (which was copied and improved a bit by Intel, and named USB).
There's two.
~Philly