Windows 7 Share Grows At XP's Expense 412
CWmike writes "Microsoft's Windows ran to stay in place last month as Window 7's market share gains made up for the largest-ever declines in Windows XP and Vista, data released today by Web metrics firm Net Applications showed. By these numbers, Windows 7's gains were primarily at the expense of Windows XP. For each copy of Vista replaced by Windows 7 during November, more than six copies of XP were swapped out. Meanwhile, Apple's Mac OS X lost share during November... betcha Ballmer is having an extra giddy time with that news. Linux came up a winner last month, returning to the 1% share mark for the first time since July. Linux's all-time high in Net Applications' rankings was May 2009, when it nearly reached 1.2%."
Finally... (Score:2, Funny)
Yet another story stating the obvious (Score:4, Insightful)
Of course people are upgrading from XP to 7 - if they are upgrading at all. Who upgrades from Debian to Windows? Or, Solaris to Windows?
Oh - 6 XP users upgrade for every Vista user? Surprise, surprise!! Probably half a billion people in this world THOUGH about upgrading to Vista, but decided not to when Vista proved to be such a bomb.
Let's remember, Vista wouldn't run on old equipment, while Win7 runs on anything over a gigahertz with a gig of memory. A lot of XP users COULDN'T upgrade to Vista!!
Re:Yet another story stating the obvious (Score:4, Interesting)
Of course they are upgrading, my Vista system just decided it wasn't genuine, last month my boss's XP machine decided it wasn't genuine coincidence? If you can't find that little certificate what choice do you have, you can't even buy XP anymore! At least I was dual-booting with Linux but Mozilla reports it's IE6 on Vista.
Re:Yet another story stating the obvious (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Yet another story stating the obvious (Score:5, Informative)
"Vista runs on anything 7 runs on"
Not so. I have installed 7 on the very same hardware that Vista barfed on. I've never seen the BOSD on 7 that Vista threw up frequently. More, 7 runs beautifully in a VM, while Vista is something of a dog. As I said, 7 runs decently on a 1 ghz machine with one gig of RAM. Vista will not.
Re:Yet another story stating the obvious (Score:4, Informative)
I won't get into a discussion about which is the better virtualization software - but I'm using Sun's Virtual Box - version 3.0.12 and I update with each new release. I allocate 1 gig of memory, and I enable all virtualization options. CPU is an AMD 3400+ (the stupid Victoria chip - I don't have all the virtualization that other chips have)
I turn Aero off, because the video card isn't up to it - or at least not from the VM. (I don't like Aero anyway, I prefer the "Classic" desktop) I also do a little bit of tweaking, but nothing radical. I run Win 7 with Microsoft's security essentials and Threatfire - don't install a heavy duty anti-virus. I tested the earliest beta releases, and I was pleased. The release candidate was a disappointment, because it ran slower than the betas for some reason. But, the final release is right back where the Betas were. It runs just as good as Windows XP with the same memory and options on the same machine.
If it makes any difference at all, I'm running Ubuntu Intrepid on this machine. A Mac may get different results, I have no idea. I just looked - if you're running and INTEL MAC, you're in luck. I don't see a download for PPC MAC. And, I see that they now have version 3.1 available. Time for me to upgrade.
I hope that helps!! ;^)
Re: (Score:2)
The version trending [hitslink.com] shows that as many people who dumped XP or Vista picked up 7 and as many people as dumped OSX 10.5 picked up 10.6. So, the decline in Mac share comes from pre-10.5. There are a lot of possibilities that jump to mind
Re: (Score:2)
That's not so wrong. If you look at these numbers, you can see that Mac lost .15%, Windows stayed the same, and Linux gained .04%. So, about 25% of Mac's loss was Linux's gain. The rest seems to have been made up by mobile phones (but not the iphone, which also lost .01%).
I suspect these numbers are only meaningful on a year by year basis. 0.15% just does not seem significant enough to make any kind of judgment on. It certainly possible that some users migrated away from 10.5, but it's no less likely that Mac users spent a little less time on the net in November.
Good to see Windows 7 selling and XP dropping though. XP has become the IE6 of operation systems (as far as application devs are concerned).
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
OK - if your a developer - or anybody who is - please tell me something...
I just made a big jump from Win XP Pro and MSVC 6 to Windows 7 64 bit and VS2008, and I am trying to get up to speed. I created a very simple benchmarking console app [tropicalcoder.com] on the old system and compiled a release build under MSVC 6 [tropicalcoder.com], and then compiled exactly the same code under VS2008 on the new machine. No matter what optimizations I used, or whether I created a 32 bit release build or a 64 bit release build with VS2008, the exe created u
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
The reason this is significant is twofold: first, because Windows XP is easily the biggest competitor to Vista and now Windows 7, and second, because an upgrade from Windows XP to 7 [usually] means $$$ for Microsoft, while an upgrade from Ubuntu 9.04 to 9.10 means nothing except perhaps a little bandwidth consumption.
Re:Finally... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Finally... (Score:4, Funny)
Good news for Linux (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Good news for Linux (Score:5, Insightful)
I suspect the days of people running out and buying Windows upgrades in droves are behind us. The excitement and wonder doesn't happen anymore because the OS we already have by and large does what we need an OS to do. What defines an OS is now mature, no longer making leaps and bounds of dramatic feature inclusions that matter to Joe Average. Even IT guys are unimpressed.
Second point: I had my first hands-on with Windows 7 today. I'm somewhat bewildered. In what way is this not Vista 1.1? Sure, okay, there are some cosmetic changes to the taskbar but really, I fail to find anything revolutionary. Certainly nothing that justifies the same folks who've said all along that Vista was "bad" to say that 7 is "awesome". Is a slight reduction in UAC prompts really enough?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
snip
Second point: I had my first hands-on with Windows 7 today. I'm somewhat bewildered. In what way is this not Vista 1.1? Sure, okay, there are some cosmetic changes to the taskbar but really, I fail to find anything revolutionary. Certainly nothing that justifies the same folks who've said all along that Vista was "bad" to say that 7 is "awesome". Is a slight reduction in UAC prompts really enough?
I think that MS did that intentionally. Vista was such a pain because it was such a sharp break from XP. Porting any reasonably complex application from XP to Vista is a difficult task; especially if that application has existed since the 9x days. I think MS is trying to do smaller more incremental releases now.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, the phrase for it is "mojave #2: retarded bugaloo"
It's the same concept and reason.
Re: (Score:2)
I bought a copy of windows 7 for $30 due to my wife's employer being a college. I haven't installed it on anything yet, and I don't have plans to, but for $30 it will be nice to have a legitimate copy if the need arises. For my old Dell laptop and my Parallels needs XP works just fine.
Sheldon
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Bad news for you is that you don't have a legitimate copy. You have a copy made by Microsoft, but it's still illegal to use a version you are not allowed to use.
Re: (Score:2)
Bad news for you is that you don't have a legitimate copy. You have a copy made by Microsoft, but it's still illegal to use a version you are not allowed to use.
Are you implying that if he did not buy the windows copy he was using, it was then NOT made by Microsoft? Is that like the tree falling in the woods sort of thing?
-Em
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Unlike Vista it doesn't sit there and grind the hard drive for no discernable reason for ages. That in itself is good enough for me! (and a sad indictment of vista)
Yes yes turned off prefetch, indexing etc.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Really?
Run program.
Right click Taskbar button.
Hit Pin to Taskbar.
Done.
Re: (Score:2)
Right click on a shortcut and select "Pin to Taskbar" is more difficult? I'm not sure how to properly compare the difficultly of drag and drop vs a context menu, but it seems clear that neither should be described as difficult.
Re: (Score:2)
In addition to what the other people have said (right click->pin to taskbar), you got me curious to see what happened if you drag and drop an icon from the desktop onto the taskbar. Guess what? It pins it to the taskbar!
So now I want to know what old method of adding to the quick launch have you found that now no longer work in Windows 7? To what were you referring when you said that it was more difficult?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not to mention copies of Windows 7 being given away to TechNet people left and right these days, college students, Windows 7 launch party copies, and the $10 copies that Best Buy employees got.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
"Windows 7 being given away to TechNet people"
Uh...I pay a yearly subscription for my TechNet copies. I wouldn't exactly call ~$250 a year "giving away".
Re:Good news for Linux (Score:5, Funny)
I know of 25 people who bought windows 7 to replace vista or XP. I still have bruises from the XP people. They were a bit annoyed that I had to back up and reinstall their apps. They thought it would upgrade them to 7. For some reason the vista people where happy to hear the word format. They even wanted to format the hard drive more then once to make sure vista was gone.
how many bought Windows 7? (Score:2)
I bet most of those using Windows 7 bought new PCs with it installed. Most people do not upgrade the OS their PC uses. And businesses as well as others who need to get work should wait until MS releases the first service pack before upgrading. Wait until MS fixes the bugs and holes.
Falcon
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Good news for Linux (Score:5, Informative)
As an MSDN user, I've actually been using the RTM since before the October, 22 launch. I've run into several kernel-level driver issues (BSOD when enabling jumbo frames on an Atheros PCI-E NIC fixed by reverting to the MS driver, Realtek audio driver refuses to release apps, preventing the system from shutting down, restarting, or going into standby - fixed by reverting to the MS driver or upgrading to the latest driver, and high kernel memory usage with an older Nvidia driver). Each bug was fixed by either using the recommended MS driver, installed by default during the install process, or by upgrading to the latest driver.
There are a number of features I like:
- Feels as fast as XP with better UI
- Meaningful 64 bit support (drivers for everything) compared to XP-64 and to a lesser extent, Vista 64 bit when it was released
- Optimized for Core i7 systems (Core parking improved, doesn't bounce processes from core to core like Vista, uses less power)
- Libraries are great (I have TV shows and Movies spread over many external TB drives which all show up in one library)
- System indexing with the ability to search the remote index on a shared computer instantly - first time a search over a SMB network has been usable
- File sharing performance greatly improved vs. XP
My favorite features at the moment are the improvements to networking. The Homegroup feature does make setting up a network easier. However, I like it due to the addition of remotely-accessible Libraries and instant searching of remote machines.
But the most significant networking improvement vis-a-v XP SP3 is the network throughput over SMB. SMB1 quite simply stinks. I would usually get 7-8 MB/sec transfer speeds in a 100 Mbit connection whereas I always got 11.5 MB/sec - fully saturing the line - with SMB2 in Win 7 - Win 7 transfers and Linux-Linux SFTP/SCP. You really need Vista/7 or Linux to take full advantage of Gigabit networking (OS X performance stinks based on some benchmarks I've seen). SMB2 can saturate a gigabit line at 115 MB/sec whereas at best you'll get around 40-50% usage in XP.
The limitation for me has been my hard drive speed. I've been able to transfer 10 GB movies at 95 MB/sec avg speeds from my laptop to Core i7 desktop using eSATA attached storage on the laptop. I got the identical speed transferring from the same hard drive attached via eSATA on the desktop to the internal SATA drive. RAM --> RAM transfers in jperf sustain 118 MB/sec (99.9% utilization), and I can do about 115 MB/sec if I have a large file in RAM and copy it over the network.
Overally, I'm quite pleased with Windows 7 and glad I upgraded.
Compare to Vista (Score:3, Insightful)
Assuming a similar number of people bought a new computer that came with Vista and it took 5 months to reach the same market share as Win7 in 3 weeks, I would say that a good portion of Win7 sales is on upgrades and not new computers.
Re:Good news for Linux (Score:4, Insightful)
I wonder how many of those are people who bought Windows 7 and how many are just people who bought a computer that came with Windows 7?
The Win 7 Beta/RC broke 1% in September.
Windows 7 was released on October 22nd. On November 30 it had a 4% share in monthly tracking and was averaging 5% in daily tracking.
You could argue that a 5% global desktop share was achieved in one month of retail system sales.
But to do that, you have to chop off the low end.
The Win 7 netbook is only beginning to make its presence felt in places like Walmart.
To my eyes, these numbers simply don't make sense unless you assume very strong pre-sales of Windows 7.
The upgrade coupon and the retail box.
The upgrade implies confidence in a DIY Windows system install or upgrade. It's an unmistakable vote for Windows.
Well.. (Score:4, Interesting)
Yes, 7 is ***cheap*** for education.
Re: (Score:2)
In all seriousness, while I'm a huge fan of deploying Linux in educational environments (especially Ubuntu desktops and departmental servers), I'd give just about anything to see IE6 finally die in fire. I run an educational resources site [classhelper.org], and about 10% of my visitors are still using it.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, 7 is ***cheap*** for education.
Whatever the price, it will always be endlessly more expensive than Linux.
Re:Well.. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Well.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Well.. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The true power of the Dark Side is that we have cookies.
Re:Well.. (Score:5, Informative)
Who said anything about the updates being automatic and direct from Microsoft?
You disable workstations & servers on your network from pinging Microsoft Update directly, instead checking a local WSUS server or getting a push via Active Directory. When patches are released by MS, you check them out in a test lab, and if everything passes, you deploy them to your network via AD or WSUS.
When you have it all set up properly, it really is pretty impressive how well you can manage systems w/ AD and other tools MS provides with very little administrative overhead.
Re:Well.. (Score:5, Informative)
Active directory is not only used to authenticate users, where it's value is derived from is the ability to organized your entire computer network into organizational units and apply custom policies to each of those OUs. Think of this as having a *nix repository for every OU and in this repo there is a custom script to modify /etc to apply the correct policy to all your machines. Now add the ability to do all this with a couple mouse clicks. This is active directory.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I call that CFengine [cfengine.org]. Except I don't have to a mouse, so that's even better.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
You can't set up your own repository? Really?
Because that's what Linux calls it, before Windows copied it.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Well.. (Score:4, Informative)
It also allows you to control most aspects of a PC's (or user's) configuration via GPO - security especially.
That Firefox is not easily (if at all) manageable via AD is one of the things holding it back from being accepted in more corporate environments.
What you describe is more akin to SMS and WSUS. AD can assume most or all of that functionality, and then some.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Active Directory is a MS-standard LDAP server. Like OpenLDAP. You can use LDAP to store your users and login to your linux machines using it as the password store.
However, the OP doesn't understand what AD is, as he thinks it pushes software to clients amongst other things (network configuration?). To get those features you need to buy more server software from MS, like WSUS or Systems Centre. There are similar things available for Linux too (eg a repository for updates, Puppet or CFEngine for client config
Re:Well.. (Score:5, Informative)
Average people don't even realize that AD exists on their corporate PCs, nor that it's how corporate IT manages thousands of systems with only a handful of admins.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Perhaps these links will be of help to you then. You seem to not be up-to-date.
Red Hat and Novell have quite a bit to help manage your Linux (and Windows, in Novell's case) infrastructure; this is only a quick sampling. If you're truly interested in it, you'll need to contact their representatives and have a dog-n-pony show, like the Microsoft ones you've attended.
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
Oh dear I bit.
> 8,000 students * {student turnover period} shown just one OS. Will they see anything of Open Source apart from Moodle?
Now that's an education for you.
Incidentally, there are many Open Source OSs that have a cost of next to nothing but a value way beyond ***cheap***
Why do you think 7 is ***cheap***? It's not altruism, it's good business sense for MS to practically give away software for education.
As a matter of interest, can you tell me what you have really gained from moving from XP to
Re:Well.. (Score:4, Insightful)
And what we got with 7? Are YOU kidding or are you just one of those fanboys that don't ever botter to see beyond the pretty interface of a OS?:
Much better Active directory integration
Accessibility improvements. Microsoft has revamped the accessibility features in Windows 7 with improved speech recognition and a new Magnifier utility with full-screen and lens-mode views.
Action Center. While previous versions of Windows included a feature called Windows Security Center that monitored the various security features of the system, Windows 7 takes this functionality to the next level with Action Center. In addition to monitoring security, Action Center also monitors the OS's maintenance features and consolidates alerts from numerous Windows features into a single interface.
Aero Peek. This replacement for Show Desktop in Windows 7 lets you "peek" behind all of the open windows on your desktop and easily view and Windows Gadgets or files on your desktop. You can also peek into the contents of specific open windows.
Aero Snaps. By dragging open windows in certain ways, you can "snap" them to the edges of the screen, maximize, or minimize. This obviates the need to click tiny onscreen elements, making these features more accessible to users.
Backup and Restore. Windows Vista's stellar backup and restore features have been streamlined and simplified in Windows 7. Like its predecessor, Windows 7 supports both data backup and image-based system backup, but now the UIs are more segregated.
Bitlocker To Go. The full-drive encryption feature that first debuted in Windows Vista has been updated in Windows 7 to support removable USB storage devices like flash memory drives and portable hard drives.
Blu-Ray support. Windows 7 natively supports Blu-Ray optical discs and enables you to write to Blu-Ray recordable media.
Device Stage. This Longhorn-style user experience will be made available for multi-function devices such as smart phones, multifunction printers, portable media players, and the like. Through this UI, you'll be able to access the features that are unique to each device. Each Device Stage page can be extensively customized by the device maker.
Devices and Printers. This activity center provides a central location for interacting with any hardware devices--digital cameras, mice, displays, keyboards, and the like--that may be attached to your PC.
DirectAccess. This feature is aimed at business users who need to securely access corporate network resources while away from the office. Essentially a simple replacement for VPN connections, DirectAccess requires Windows Server 2008 R2 on the server-side.
DirectX 11. Windows 7 includes the latest version of the DirectX multimedia libraries.
Display improvements. Windows 7 includes numerous improvements related to computer displays, including integrated display color calibration, improved high DPI support, ClearType, and improved support for external displays. A new Windows Key + P keyboard shortcut helps you easily switch between connected displays.
HomeGroup. Microsoft has consolidated the most common network-based sharing tasks into a single simple interface called HomeGroup. Computers in a HomeGroup can easily share documents, digital media files, and printers over a home network.
Internet Explorer. Windows 7 ships with the latest version of Microsoft's Web browser, Internet Explorer 8.
Libraries. In Windows 7, Microsoft has realized a long-term goal to replace the static special shell folders from previous Windows versions and replace them with virtualized shell locations that aggregate content from a variety of physical locations. Libraries are implemented as virtual folders and the views
Re: (Score:2)
The same thing that everyone who moved from XP to 7 gained.
Windows 7 is nicer to use in almost every respect. The new taskbar (which is the best use of desktop compositing I've seen), the improved Alt-Tab window and the searchable start menu are the things that jump to mind most readily.
If we're talking about real, demonstrable gains, the move from 2000 -> XP was far more questionable.
I will happily admit that I can only comment on this from the user's perspective, I don't know what changes were made bet
Gah! (Score:2)
That article was basically a graph [hitslink.com] in text form.
Re: (Score:2)
Whoever constructed that graph should be ashamed of himself. Perspective does not belong in a line plot.
Liars and statistics (Score:2)
How on earth do you accurately measure OS installations. I only say because I think the Linux/BSD/other non MS/Apple OSs are probably under represented. For example like a few other people, I stamped an ext{x} shaped boot on the ntfs partition on my computers.
Those computers officially run some sort of Windows but there is no Windows on here but I'm sure my PCs are counted as running Windows by Dell/HP et al.
Sadly - for balance - I can't point at a machine that came with Linux pre installed and had it rep
Re: (Score:2)
Sadly - for balance - I can't point at a machine that came with Linux pre installed and had it replaced by Windows.
There are lots of such examples. In recent years they were usually cheap laptops bought in not-quite-mature markets (think "post Soviet block", of that I'm certain)
Those machines often have some nonfunctional copy of Linux (doesn't even boot to X for example, doesn't have drivers for the hardware). Sometimes they are blank...but with Knoppix live-DVD included, so they arguably are also Linux machines... Well, one major (really major) PC manufacturer usually adds FreeDOS, so at least those machines are exclu
Re: (Score:2)
Sadly - for balance - I can't point at a machine that came with Linux pre installed and had it replaced by Windows.
I can. Remember all those Lindows boxes that Walmart sold? Most of the people I know that bought them installed Windows on them. They either planned to install Windows right away or got fed up with the 'fake windows' that wouldn't run their software and subsequently installed windows. I think Walmart selling crappy low end linux boxes pretending to be Windows boxes did a lot of PR damage to Linux.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, statistics are kind of interesting, but you have to try to keep a clear idea of what they're really saying. I guess these are measurements of the share of web traffic each OS has according to some measurement of web traffic. Is it done with unique IPs, in which case NAT could caused skewed statistics? Is it doing it by cookies? Which sites, exactly, are being monitored? Is it being treated like a random sample and used to extrapolate data? Is there an attempt to account for people who might not
Re: (Score:2)
To be expected? (Score:5, Interesting)
I mean, the headline makes it sound like Microsoft isn't do so well, but the full summary suggests that Apple is the one lowering its Market share to Linux.
I mean, Considering PC's have the most market share, anyone who doesn't use Windows is essentially using whatever their alternative is (OSX/Linux) to get AWAY from Windows (Especially Vista, that pushed a few people I know towards a Macbook).
So, was Windows 7 expected to Rip all thsoe Happy Mac customers back to Windows? Or was it majestically expected to make Linux users go insane?
Windows Users use Windows, and Windows 7 will only grow from the market share of other Windows operating systems. It'll be a long while before Mac and Linux users go back to Windows, and the four horsemen of the Apocalypse will be just as stumped as I will be.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Exactly. Windows 7 is good enough to keep me using Windows if I buy another Windows machine. I was running the RC on my old Thinkpad and it actually had decent performance. Unfortunately, I reinstalled Win XP and, well, I don't care what anyone claims, XP is still faster on older hardware (and yes, I turned off all the eye-candy stuff on the thinkpad). However, if I bought a new machine today and it came with 7, I'd keep it, unlike Vista.
Well duh! (Score:2)
For each copy of Vista replaced by Windows 7 during November, more than six copies of XP were swapped out.
Well duh! That's because there are more than six XP users per each Vista user!
Re: (Score:2)
Probably true.
I will say that going from XP to Windows 7 is a much larger leap than going from Vista to Windows 7... if you're already running Vista, you already have pretty much everything in 7 except for the new Start bar. Vista users probably feel less pressure to upgrade due to that.
Re: (Score:2)
Probably true.
I will say that going from XP to Windows 7 is a much larger leap than going from Vista to Windows 7... if you're already running Vista, you already have pretty much everything in 7 except for the new Start bar. Vista users probably feel less pressure to upgrade due to that.
Well, I think it is even simpler than that.
Unlike the crowd here, MOST people run whatever comes on their PC.
People who buy new computers (you know, ones with Windows 7) are more likely to be replacing an older computer (more likely one that shipped with XP) rather than newer one (with Vista).
Thus the Windows 7 systems are mostly replacing XP. Why this is news is beyond me. Now if it was the other way around, I would be very surprised.
-Em
Re: (Score:2)
Vista has around 20% of market so your statement is clearly wrong in quantative terms at least. XP users are more likely to upgrade because their machines are old. Not much point upgrading from Vista to 7.
how is this news? (Score:2, Insightful)
Certainly how is it bad news for microsoft? It's just saying that people are upgrading from XP to 7
Windows XP is dead (Score:2)
Net Applications confirms it.
Spin (Score:3, Insightful)
Why is this being reported as some kind of loss for Microsoft? Isn't this *exactly* what they wanted? XP users who didn't switch to Vista to switch to 7?
Trend is viewable on Steam Hardware Survery (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Yes. The big deal is that Vista and 7 are your only choices for a well-supported 64-bit version of Windows (XP x64 or 2003 works for some, but drivers can be a problem, and there's no clear future there) - and you need that for 4+Gb of RAM, which is becoming more and more common on gamer rigs these days.
There were also some tests that have shown that 7 actually beats XP in some popular games. On the other hand, Vista lags behind consistently.
Amazing! (Score:2)
Linux has a 75% market share (Score:2)
Really. I just did a survey of all the computers in my house. Three were running Ubuntu Linux, one was running Windows Vista.
That's a 75% market share!
Re:Linux has a 75% market share (Score:4, Interesting)
Likely the recession (Score:2)
I think the recession plays a major factor in Apple's slight drop. Apple's smart in holding the line, however, since they don't want a large line of low margin products that will have heavy support costs. After the recession fades, they want to look consistent with their pricing.
Also, I wonder if they counted virtual machines in the survey?
Linux is more succesful than the iPhone (Score:4, Insightful)
According to these numbers there are three times more Linux users than iPhone users. The iPhone is generally considered a huge success. Why is Linux percieved so differently?
Re:Linux is more succesful than the iPhone (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Linux is more succesful than the iPhone (Score:4, Funny)
Yeah, and my lemonade stand has about 90% of the neighbourhood market, yet somehow I don't have the market cap or coke? When will investors realise this madness, and start buying my stocks?
Hear hear! (Score:3, Informative)
I got karma to burn.
Been a switch-hitter between Linux, FreeBSD, and Windows for years. For the past year or so, it's been Ubuntu and Vista. I'd say I spent equal time in both. I've got Ubuntu tweaked to my liking, and when I was mobile, usually used Linux because of the fast boot and wake-from-RAM times. Vista had to be there, well, because Linux multimedia just blows. It took me the good part of a week to get my laptop dock's S/PDIF port to work, and that was only after manually ripping out ALSA and building OSS4 from scratch, and even then, it only ever saw the S/PDIF port as 44.1kHz, 16-bit capable. That said, I enjoy using it, I'm not afraid of the command line, but we've still got a long way to go. I'm not quite yet comfortable with recommending Linux to firends and family. Kudos to getting back up to 1% though!
Windows 7 got clean-installed about a week ago. To me, the UI seems much smoother (No more bajillion clicks to get to a NIC's IP settings page), even the Start menu was given a once-over. To me, it's just as good as Windows 2000, and a marked improvement over XP. But who knows, It's only got a week of clutter on it yet.
The answer is "Netbooks" (Score:4, Insightful)
It's hard to argue with a $200 price tag.
Time to change useragent and add another "gain" (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Linux 20% market share (Score:5, Informative)
How?
The NetApp data:
Windows: 92.52%
Mac OS X: 5.12%
Linux (all flavors): 1.00%
Other (including iPhone, Symbian, Java ME): 1.36%
That's 7.48% "non-MS share" on these numbers (and really only non-Windows--it's not apparent whether they count Windows Mobile as "Windows" or as "Other"). Linux, therefore has 13.37% of the "non-MS market". For comparison of the other ones broken out entirely, Apple has 73.26% of that market (Mac+iPhone). Java ME has 6.1%. Symbian has 2.5%
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder what the error bars are those numbers are. Are they tidy enough to justify using two decimal points?
Re:Linux 20% market share (Score:5, Informative)
There are no error bars. This is a straight dump from their collected information on web traffic.
Anyone who mistakes this information for a statistical evaluation of actual market share by physical units or even actual market share by "web presence" is misusing the data.
They may well try to make a fairly representative sampling based on diversifying websites they collect data from, but day-to-day, let alone month-to-month, variation makes this data at best a rough approximation of the actual market. But they're not claiming that this data is a reflective snapshot of any actual market--they leave that to lazy journalists. Instead, what their statistics track are trends over time using a consistent methodology. It's a clue about the state of the actual market, but nothing more. Only lazy journalists would take a single month's reported numbers and make a claim about actual market share.
Their numbers are accurate to several decimal places--they have an exact count of the "survey respondents"--the over 100 million reporting machines each month. Where there is insufficient data is making a projection from that sample to the actual market (but again, the data can't realistically be used for that). Linux's NetApp share has bounced up and down a distance of 0.1% since the middle of the year. This probably has nothing to do with Linux's actual market share changing and more to do with variations in browsing habits and which sites are recorded.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
There are no error bars. This is a straight dump from their collected information on web traffic.
You sure about that? This article indicates they have some form of weighting:
http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/08/02/net-applications-apple-just-lost-half-its-market-share/ [cnn.com]
Re: (Score:2)
The weighting isn't based on projections to an actual market share, though. That's the missing step.
Error bars and statistical confidence are applicable only when stating that a sample is reflective of a population. This data is not reflective of a population. It's just a calculation of raw data passed through a systemic algorithm.
For a simplistic example, if I have a data collection method that tracks occurrences through two populations, A and B, and I discard 50% of population B because that's the samp
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
so what your telling me is that the data only tells us how much net traffic windows generates
No. You're misusing the numbers. It shows what proportion of the traffic they monitor, from the sites they monitor, weighted the way they weight it, comes from machines reporting themselves as Windows (or Linux, or BSD, or OS X) computers.
are we to conclude that this is because of market share, or that linux and mac users are actually doing some work
Neither.
it is of course the correlation of the two.
Nope. The data collected is for relative trends, not for overall "net traffic" or for install base market share or for active users or any other actual market.
By using the same methodology consistently, the relative reporting in your sample size can show clues a
Correction (Score:2)
Windows Mobile's 0.04% market share is not included in the 92.52% of Windows machines reported, but rather, part of "other":
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=8 [hitslink.com]
Therefore, the non-MS market has just been downsized to 7.44% and Linux's share of that is accordingly bumped up to 13.44%.
However, the iPod touch (0.07%) is also not counted in the iPhone's 0.36% market share, so Apple's relative share of that same market goes up to 74.60%.
Another interesting tidbit from these (
Would you all stop that?... (Score:2)
While using site stats is probably quite accurate for desktop OSes (they are all used virtually the same, most of them networked...and as a matter of fact, probably mostly some Windows machines aren't), it is totally meaningless for mobile phones.
Too many external factors.
Besides, we have some decent stats from other sources (there's a graph at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartphone [wikipedia.org] , though only for smartphones of course...)
Re:Linux 20% market share (Score:5, Funny)
Linux, therefore has 13.37% of the "non-MS market".
If that isn't proof Linux is awesome then I don't know what is.
Re: (Score:2)
You are assuming that 100% of Symbian devices sold are used for web browsing. Considering the amount that some phone companies charge for data access, I very much doubt the figure would be anywhere near that percentage. Given how quickly people seem to upgrade their phones, I would also doubt that a lot of those devices are still in active use.
No, not everything Nokia is Symbian... (Score:2)
A year ago half of global population had mobile phones, now probably around 4.5 billion. Nokia has around 40% of that. There's no way Symbian smartphones amount to half of their produced handsets (just look around you...and remember that you live in developed world; in reality, S30 and S40 (which are NOT Symbian) dominate)
BTW, a billionth Nokia phone, sold in 2005, was Nokia 1100. As far from the "smartphone" as it can be...
Re: (Score:2)
So why not dig out "unetbootin" and see what the box is capable of without hurting your precious Windows.
You never know, you might even run one of the installers ...
It wont change the pretty graph but it might avoid aerial laptop maneuvers.
Re: (Score:2)
application launch time ARE slower, by a few seconds, compared to XP. especially when opening MS Word or Excel, I'd say more than a few seconds
I often see claims like this and I question them. I don't remember the launch times for Word or Excel 2003, but ever since Office 2007 on XP I've found the applications take no longer than a few seconds to launch, total. In the case of Excel, I can literally double-click the icon, count "one, two, three," and I have a blank spreadsheet. It's not much slower on my Atom-powered Eee PC with slow solid-state drives. If your copies are launching many times slower than that, either your hardware is very out of d
Re: (Score:2)
So my 1 purchase will count as 2 copies of Windows 7 being sold.
The quoted figures are based on Internet usage, not sales. They will not be able to see operating systems that are not installed. Nor will they see computers that are not used for surfing the net. I have six computers that in active use, but only two of them are configured for web access.
That is why these stats are inadequate for really determining operating system usage. Unfortunately there really is no better system to count them.
Re: (Score:2)
So I ask you: have you ever seen a Linux desktop in the wild? LUG meetings do not count. Here's my definition of what counts: coffee shops, restaurants, airports, trains, lobbies, office cubicles, etc.
Two definite sightings: 1) a laptop on a subway, 2) my friend (a character artist for a game studio) uses Ubuntu at home on a desktop. Both instances were user installs. A place I worked a couple jobs ago doing Java dev had a pile of Linux machines--most of the software engineers used them.
In my experience, the stigma of using Linux is way down in the workplace from what it was 10 years ago.
All this being said, I can't think of any reason to doubt that the Net Application numbers are correctly representin