A Look At the Safety of Google Public DNS 213
darthcamaro writes "Yesterday we discussed Google's launch of its new Public DNS service. Now Metasploit founder and CSO at Rapid7, H D Moore, investigates how well-protected Google's service is against the Kaminsky DNS flaw. Moore has put together a mapping of Google's source port distribution on the Public DNS service. In his view, it looks like the source ports are sufficiently random, even though they are limited to a small range of ports. The InternetNews report on Moore's research concludes: 'What Moore's preliminary research clearly demonstrates to me is that Google really does need to live up to its promise here. Unlike a regular ISP, Google will be subject to more scrutiny (and research) than other DNS providers.'"
Re:Beware (Score:0, Funny)
Re:And the worst case scenario? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Jenny (Score:4, Funny)
Re:And the worst case scenario? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Privacy for what? (Score:2, Funny)
If you're just going to be a paranoid fuck and ignore all discussion in favor of your prejudices then why even waste your time coming to this site? Obviously nobody's going to change your mind without buying you a fucking plane ticket to Google's data center so you can read the code yourself, and you're certainly not going to convince anyone of anything by making trite, sarcastic, baseless remarks. Even if someone were to take your point to heart, it still wouldn't prove what you're obviously trying to imply: that they're lying THIS time.
Way to post as AC too, ensuring that nobody will ever be able to communicate back to you just how fucking USELESS you are.