What DARPA's Been Up To, At Length 54
Posted
by
timothy
from the one-long-list-of-credits dept.
from the one-long-list-of-credits dept.
The New York Times takes an inside look at DARPA, the secretive defense agency, mentioned frequently on Slashdot, that is "changing the way we use machines — and the way they use us" in the form of a review of Michael Belfiore's The Department of Mad Scientists. Besides tracing the history of the agency, Belfiore's book expounds on the well-known Grand Challenge and its link to ever-more-automated vehicle control in civilian and military contexts, as well as other DARPA pet projects, including robotic surgery, information analysis, and the integration of electronics with the human body.
The truth (Score:4, Interesting)
Darpa is an old boys network that funds tons of projects by the program managers friends. I worked on a robot project for a couple of years and it was depressing. They ask you to do something impossible, but something that sounds cool. Then they don't care if it doesn't work - the right money has exchanged hands.
Sure they have done some good things, but that was a long time ago. What my complaint is mainly about is the low level of science, and the sleazy way they distribute their money.
The suckitude that was DARPA head Tony Tether (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:The suckitude that was DARPA head Tony Tether (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Being human, being cyborgs (Score:2, Interesting)
True fact: my family does not have a TV at our home, though we do have a DVD. The result: my children actually read books, as well as watch relatively high-quality movies.
In other words: education is not just about the educational "system". We as parents can and should take control.
Re:The suckitude that was DARPA head Tony Tether (Score:1, Interesting)
I'd rather see funding go to a project for people that have been languishing for decades: upper extremity amputees have all but been ignored by the prosthetics manufacturers because they are such a small segment of the amputee populace. Extraordinary progress has been made in leg technology just since the 80's, but most arm users have been stuck with a device ( the cable operated elbow and split hook )that hasn't fundamentally changed since the Civil War. Sure, there have been incremental moves forward over the long years, but most of them didn't amount to much ( anyone remember the Boston Arm from 1969? ), meanwhile progress remains glacial.
I'm not holding my breath - there have been numerous announcements of breakthroughs before, and revolutionary prototypes that disappeared without a trace. Making a human-compatible arm is hard in ways that make some problems seem trivial in comparison. At least some attention is being paid, and a lot of good work is being done.
It's been needed for 60 years, so does that count as long term for you, or is it not 'academic' enough?
Re:Dear DARPA - Find a way to scan and stop terror (Score:3, Interesting)
I think the tech we DO have was funded by DARPA at some point in the development of quite a bit of it. And how WITHOUT "exotic experimental stuff" will we find something that can ?
Re:The truth (Score:1, Interesting)
nsf v darpa (Score:1, Interesting)
your forgetting the religious lobby, nsf research tends to support inconvenient truths such as evolution directly or indirectly (such as genetic based research); whereas money spent on darpa will likely result in people of competing faiths being reduced in number.