Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Military Transportation Technology

DARPA Kick-Starts Flying Car Program 136

coondoggie writes to share that DARPA is finally trying to make good on the promise of flying cars for our future with the new "Transformer" (TX) project. "DARPA said the vehicle will need to be able to drive on prepared surface and light off-road conditions, as well as support Vertical Takeoff and Landing (VTOL) features. The TX will also support range and speed efficiencies that will allow for missions to be performed on a single tank of fuel. DARPA said the TX will 'provide the flexibility to adapt to traditional and asymmetric threats by providing the operator unimpeded movement over difficult terrain. In addition, transportation is no longer restricted to trafficable terrain that tends to makes movement predictable.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

DARPA Kick-Starts Flying Car Program

Comments Filter:
  • by Z00L00K ( 682162 ) on Monday January 04, 2010 @06:20PM (#30647262) Homepage Journal

    This will probably be something that's only for military use of some kind.

    But I doubt that they can get decent economy from it. The fuel consumption of air cars is one big disadvantage - and the ability to carry a decent payload another.

    They would better research antigravity first.

  • by GooberToo ( 74388 ) on Monday January 04, 2010 @06:38PM (#30647506)

    Many small aircraft get as good, if not better, than many SUVs and at 2-3 times the speed while carrying one to four people and a small amount of luggage.

    The only hard part of the requirements is that it be a VTOL aircraft which will significantly affect the design, performance, and practicality. If they changed their requirements from VTOL to STOL of less than 1000 feet, the designs are likely to offer vastly superior capabilities.

  • no, no no (Score:2, Interesting)

    by kehren77 ( 814078 ) on Monday January 04, 2010 @06:46PM (#30647614)

    We don't need flying cars. Flying cars = Falling cars. Add in volatile fuel and you have bombs. What they need to work on is a car that will hover about 2-3 feet above the ground. A hover car would eliminate the need for paved roads, road maintenance, bridges, bridge maintenance, etc... You just need lane guides and median dividers.

  • Re:Ground vs Air (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Rei ( 128717 ) on Monday January 04, 2010 @07:08PM (#30647908) Homepage

    Fly-by-wire, with a special, hard-to-get license for manual flight and restrictions on where it can be used.

    Flying cars would also require a lot of safety features to ensure survivability in an accident or mechanical problem, including multiple engines with the ability to survive the failure of one or more of them, as well as vehicle parachutes launched by a spreader gun for rapid deployment, and possibly large airbags to cushion the landing of the vehicle itself.

    Hmm... you know, I bet you could have the firing off of vehicle-scale airbags *be* the spreader for your chute if you did it right.

8 Catfish = 1 Octo-puss

Working...