Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Music Piracy Technology

Bach Launches Updated MP3 Format 279

An anonymous reader writes to tell us that Bach Technology has rolled out an updated MP3 file format in a bid to combat music piracy. Dubbed "MusicDNA," the new format offers embedded "updatable premium content" like lyrics, videos, news updates, and album artwork. "Using the new technology, music labels and bands will be able to send updates to the music files – with tour dates, interviews or updates to social networking pages – while illegally-downloaded files remain static. ... No major labels have signed up to use MusicDNA so far, but British record company Beggars Group and US label Tommy Boy are both on board. However, the files are likely to be more expensive than MP3 files – according to the BBC – and will have to compete with Apple's iTunes LP, which already provides additional content such as bonus tracks, lyrics and video interviews."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Bach Launches Updated MP3 Format

Comments Filter:
  • by Monkeedude1212 ( 1560403 ) on Monday January 25, 2010 @04:14PM (#30894996) Journal

    Opt-in, not mandatory.

    So if you want to buy music legitly, you have the option of having the bonus features, similar to those on a DVD or Blu Ray. Its just incentive to buy over pirating.

    Which is the best way to go about it, and we all know it. That way they can have their cake and we get to eat ours.

  • Re:Wrong Audience? (Score:3, Informative)

    by odin84gk ( 1162545 ) on Monday January 25, 2010 @04:15PM (#30895018)

    Not really. I don't pirate, but then again I don't go to concerts. (I really don't care that much about music).

    However, my friend who downloads a bunch of music goes to concerts and buys CD's. (He loves music, but can't afford to buy everything that he wants).

    So, in my mind, it is an appropriate audience.

  • Bach mp3? no-way (Score:5, Informative)

    by McNihil ( 612243 ) on Monday January 25, 2010 @04:40PM (#30895334)

    It wasn't Bach it was The German company Fraunhofer-Gesellshaft that did mp3 in the first place. Extremely shoddy article.

  • From TFA:

    Dubbed MusicDNA, the files contain embedded additional content including lyrics, videos, news updates and album artwork.

    Ok, so lyrics and album art totally makes sense, but... can't you already do that with ID3 tags? But videos? Why would I want to store a video in my MP3 file instead of as its own video file? And the news updates, as you said, sound like spam.

    To include some context to your quote:

    MusicDNA was developed by Norwegian firm Bach Technology, the company that also created the MP3 file, in an attempt to combat illegal file-sharing. Using the new technology, music labels and bands will be able to send updates to the music files – with tour dates, interviews or updates to social networking pages – while illegally-downloaded files remain static.

    Ok, so to me this makes it sound like, if I want to avoid getting spammed, I should listen to "illegally-downloaded files". This also implies that these files have some sort of phone-home DRM when the music is played, which is a potential privacy violation.

    You know, when I'm listening to music, I often do think, "The only way this could be better is if it had DRM and reported my listening habits back to record labels, and if I was getting spammed right now. If only someone would develop the technology!"

  • Re:Extra content (Score:3, Informative)

    by betterunixthanunix ( 980855 ) on Monday January 25, 2010 @05:17PM (#30895910)
    Or if you want lossless encoding for some reason; it is pretty rare to find FLAC files on file sharing networks.
  • Re:No thanks, Bach (Score:4, Informative)

    by Zerth ( 26112 ) on Monday January 25, 2010 @06:03PM (#30896684)

    The patents on MP3 will still expire on schedule, though I can't say I actually care enough to look up when that may be.

    In the US, December 2012 at the earliest, their main submarine patent surfacing in 1995.

    There's some others that might last until 2017, but they were put in well over a year after the mpeg standard was published(and thus technically void). Won't keep them from suing, but you might win if you aren't crushed by your own legal costs:)

    As for other countries, damned if I know. A bunch of other companies copycatted a lot, so there might be other patents in play elsewhere.

  • Re:Extra content (Score:3, Informative)

    by mister_playboy ( 1474163 ) on Monday January 25, 2010 @06:59PM (#30897346)

    No, he's right. You have to dig pretty hard to find consistent FLAC uploads. Several of the best sources are on Russian websites.

  • by Lumpy ( 12016 ) on Monday January 25, 2010 @09:32PM (#30899082) Homepage

    my rip did NOT come from the audio layer it came from the data stream out the Toslink into the PC from the SACD player, The great part is that linux ignores the stupid copyright bit.

    Just because you have no clue how to rip SACD or DVD-A audio directly does not mean everyone else does.

"If I do not want others to quote me, I do not speak." -- Phil Wayne

Working...