Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Courts The Internet

Facebook Crawler Speaks Back 317

Last week we ran a story about Facebook suing to get a crawled dataset offline. This week we have a bit of a response written by Pete Warden, the guy who actually did the crawling. He followed robots.txt, and then Facebook's lawyers went after him. It's actually a quite interesting little tale and worth your time.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Facebook Crawler Speaks Back

Comments Filter:
  • Ballsy. (Score:3, Funny)

    by Pojut ( 1027544 ) on Tuesday April 06, 2010 @09:47AM (#31747388) Homepage

    Stupid, but ballsy. Gotta give credit where it's due.

  • FTFA:

    I'm a software engineer, my last job was at Apple but for the last two years I've been working on my own startup called Mailana. The name comes from 'Mail Analysis', and my goal has been to use the data sitting around in all our inboxes to help us in our day-to-day lives.

    All Facebook is doing is nailing has "anal".

  • by mfh ( 56 ) on Tuesday April 06, 2010 @10:11AM (#31747644) Homepage Journal

    Google sells our information by what we like. They do it in a way that somewhat protects our privacy and it's part of their service. Gmail targets adds directly to you based on keywords in your emails. If you had enough money you could know what people are talking about by how the adds played out. Therefore there is no real privacy on Google email, and Google reads our emails.

    Google collects all kinds of websites and offers search. They build stats and sell off residual information based on information collected. This is why they have so many PHDs there, so they can understand what everything means on the internet to capitalize on it. Okay they say they are not evil, but that doesn't mean they don't sell the info to people who are fucking evil. In fact most of the people who deal with Google daily for business transactions (ad sense, ad words.. .etc) would eat babies, given the chance.

  • by Shakrai ( 717556 ) on Tuesday April 06, 2010 @10:14AM (#31747674) Journal

    I'll just go to Congress and explain to them that they should pass a law that will be universally opposed by the corporations that give them millions in campaign contributions every year

    You do realize that corporations can't (legally) contribute to campaigns in the United States, right?

  • Privacy ... (Score:4, Funny)

    by zuperduperman ( 1206922 ) on Tuesday April 06, 2010 @10:26AM (#31747800)
    So, Mark, you say Facebook have a reasonable expectation for privacy of its data? Isn't privacy passe now? Or did I hear you wrong?
  • by ichthyoboy ( 1167379 ) on Tuesday April 06, 2010 @11:08AM (#31748376)

    If he is the face of the next generation entrepreneurs, then Bugs Bunny save the industry.

    Happy now?

New York... when civilization falls apart, remember, we were way ahead of you. - David Letterman

Working...