Chatroulette Working On Genital Recognition Algorithm 364
Show them while you can, Internet exhibitionists. Chatroulette is working on image-recognition software that will filter out shots of male genitalia. The website's founder, Andrey Ternovskiy, hopes that blocking the offending members will help clean up Chatroulette's reputation. He's even enlisted the help of Napster founder Shawn Fanning. I wonder if someone has told Andrey how well it went for Napster?
If they really want to be popular (Score:5, Insightful)
Priorities (Score:5, Insightful)
Chatroulette is working on image-recognition software that will filter out shots of male genitalia.
I guess we know where their priorities lie...
Seriously (Score:4, Insightful)
So... the only problem is the penis? (Score:5, Insightful)
The way I read this, it says, "ChatRoulette is a great idea. The only problem is that there's too much penis. Get rid of that and it'll be fine."
Uh, no. Trolls will troll. Showing your junk to the camera is the easiest and most obvious way, but even if you cut that out you'll just face the next thing down the pike. You're never going to out-grief the trolls.
They're going to need something a lot more sophisticated than that. Google's Safe Search uses word context clues. It's far from perfect, but it seems to do a reasonably good job. If ChatRoulette doesn't want to be overrun with trolls, they're going to need to think at least that creatively, which means gathering up a lot more information than "that looks like teh peener".
Really... (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't understand why they don't have a simple voting system. If a user does something bad or obscene, vote them down. Then match the poorly rated people with each other. Or just have an obscenity button and if a person triggers it multiple times they get kicked off.
Whatever. (Score:5, Insightful)
Chatroulette has long featured the rawest side of humanity -- copulating couples, men taking their pants off, and so on. But it also allows for a potentially rewarding (and potentially lucrative) random human connection, and that's what interests investors.
While for me Chatroulette was nothing more than a one-time novelty and an interesting experiment by Ben Folds, I understand it may have a larger value to others. Unfortunately this sounds like Chatroulette is suddenly going to suck the same dicks they are eliminating because someone wants to make a buck.
Let it continue on in the way it has or let it die. Let's stop bastardizing stuff because a bunch of investors don't like others seeing the raging members sticking out from their foreheads.
escalation (Score:5, Insightful)
This will just result in games where people try to post non-genital pics that get filtered and genital pics that don't.
How about a face recognision algorithm instead? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:But... but... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:"View picture"? (Score:5, Insightful)
Female, that is.....
Re:So... the only problem is the penis? (Score:3, Insightful)
Don't forget that trolls are also humans, and therefore also have a certain intelligence. If they know that their first chat is a troll test, they will not troll until they get to the real chat.
Re:This sounds like the worst job ever... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:But... but... (Score:2, Insightful)
Anyone who wants to see male genitalia is a pervert? What about all those who want to see female genitalia?
Re:Really... (Score:2, Insightful)
What happens when the trolls start just reverse-modding people en masse?
Re:Suddenly... (Score:5, Insightful)
> ...you could just link those users to a video/chatbot that laughs at them.
Just link them to each other.
Re:So... the only problem is the penis? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:"View picture"? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Suddenly... (Score:3, Insightful)
Err.....girls don't like seeing nekkid men?!?!
News to me...
Re:Suddenly... (Score:3, Insightful)
Doubtful,
It's not that there is a huge quantity of wang, it is simply that the secret wankers are nexted very quickly.
My 20 minute conversation pulls a random aussie out of rotation for over 100 times as long as I pull a secret wanker out of the running (ten seconds tops if the screen loads slowly).
This leads to the secret wankers being very over-represented. If 1/3 of the shots are wankers, that's about .3% being wankers.
Re:Really... (Score:5, Insightful)
Show Tits or I vote you down.
Re:Really... (Score:3, Insightful)
Then match the poorly rated people with each other. Or just have an obscenity button and if a person triggers it multiple times they get kicked off.
Foolproof! Nobody is ever going to abuse that system.
But Not Female? (Score:3, Insightful)
Cool.
the obvious (Score:2, Insightful)
will this filter check every frame of every cam out there? pretty hard to do...
as another user here said its probably better using a reputation system to knock down the ones you know and apply the filter to that.
this also brings up anonymity issues, will/can users be identified?
Re:Suddenly... (Score:3, Insightful)
Besides, a healthy view of the world, clever sense of humour and the ability to actually discuss all things maturely is a lot more attractive than a penis of any size or quality.
And an excellent way to get yourself quickly friend-zoned, yeah.