Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Communications Social Networks The Internet

Utah Attorney General Tweets Execution Order 556

Kilrah_il writes "In an all-time low for Internet use, Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff used Twitter to announce to the public his approval of the execution of convicted murderer Ronnie Lee Gardner. 'I just gave the go ahead to Corrections Director to proceed with Gardner's execution. May God grant him the mercy he denied his victims,' the attorney general wrote. The AG's 7,000 followers retweeted the message further on and soon many replied concerning the awfulness of tweeting the execution of a human being. 'Mr. Shurtleff was doing nothing unusual; politicians and news organizations now routinely send out tweets to alert people to the latest developments. But as Twitter users digested endless breaking news flashes alerting them to the death of a man by firing squad in the United States, for some Mr. Shurtleff's remarks stood out from the rest.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Utah Attorney General Tweets Execution Order

Comments Filter:
  • For the record (Score:5, Informative)

    by aitikin ( 909209 ) on Sunday June 20, 2010 @02:16PM (#32633470)
    Firing squad is deemed inhumane in 49 out of 50 states, the exception being Oklahoma, where it is used solely as a backup, should lethal injection or electrocution fail or become unconstitutional. Utah allows firing squads only in cases where the prisoner had chose it before it became unconstitutional. Therefore, Gardner, having been on death row for 20 some odd years, had chose death by firing squad before it was deemed inhumane.

    I realize this is OT, but it really struck me as odd that Utah was still doing a death by firing squad. Interestingly enough, Washington State still allows prisoners the choice of their method of execution between death by hanging and death by lethal injection.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 20, 2010 @02:50PM (#32633702)

    Actually it was the Attorney General, not the Governor. And the rest of the world wonders why we think they're ignorant. They don't even bother to refer to the person who actually issued the tweet, and instead refer to the head of state for Utah.

  • by whathappenedtomonday ( 581634 ) on Sunday June 20, 2010 @03:48PM (#32634138) Journal
    The deterrent argument is scientifically invalid:

    "There is no reliable, scientifically sound evidence that [shows that executions] can exert a deterrent effect.... These flaws and omissions in a body of scientific evidence render it unreliable as a basis for law or policy that generate life-and-death decisions. To accept it uncritically invites errors that have the most severe human costs." (Discussion of recent deterrence studies [deathpenaltyinfo.org]).

  • Re:For the record (Score:5, Informative)

    by ScentCone ( 795499 ) on Sunday June 20, 2010 @05:18PM (#32634746)
    but he didn't die within seconds

    "He" was long gone. Instantly, in fact. The amount of energy delivered to his chest cavity (with very carefully chosen ammunition) produces a mammoth shock wave. Complete and irreversible instant mega brain trauma, courtesy of - among other things - the fact that major arteries connect the brain to the central plumbing. Out like a light. Don't confused some left-over autonomic nerve/muscle activity (ever seen a chicken quite literally hopping around, minus its head? I have) with him being "alive" in any way that counts.

    His victims, unfortunately, didn't die so quickly.
  • by Trerro ( 711448 ) on Sunday June 20, 2010 @06:12PM (#32635130)

    Multiple gunshot wounds to the heart generally cause death (or at least unconsciousness that will lead to death) in a matter of seconds.

    Lethal injections take several minutes to kill, and that's if they do them correctly. Remember - no actual doctor will do it as you can't violate the Hippocratic Oath much worse than that. There's been horror stories of paralyzed victims slowly losing the ability to breathe over 30-45 minutes, conscious, but unable to speak or move.

    The only reason lethal injection became popular is that it makes the death LOOK painless due to the paralysis drug preventing the victim from expressing pain.

    Given a choice, I can't imagine anyone choosing the needle.

  • Re:Dignity. (Score:3, Informative)

    by pdabbadabba ( 720526 ) on Sunday June 20, 2010 @07:22PM (#32635606) Homepage

    Close. Actually, in Utah, only one has a blank, all the others have real bullets. See, e.g., http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100618/ap_on_re_us/us_utah_firing_squad [yahoo.com]

  • Re:whoopie (Score:5, Informative)

    by jmizrahi ( 1409493 ) on Sunday June 20, 2010 @08:20PM (#32635918)

    Widely held to be a mistranslation by whom?

    By linguists. The Hebrew word "hariga" means killing, whereas "retzach" means murder. "Retzach" is the word used in the ten commandments. You're welcome to dislike the Bible, but this particular complaint is unfounded.

  • Re:whoopie (Score:4, Informative)

    by tsm_sf ( 545316 ) on Sunday June 20, 2010 @08:27PM (#32635950) Journal
    Isn't the difference between killing and murder just that one is forbidden and the other isn't?

    Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord. -Romans 12:19
    To me belongeth vengeance and recompense; their foot shall slide in due time: for the day of their calamity is at hand, and the things that shall come upon them make haste. -Deuteronomy 32:35
    Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself: I am the LORD. -Leviticus 19:18

    The bible's take on the subject is pretty clear. Reinterpreting scripture to get what you want isn't exactly a new phenomenon.
  • Re:Oh, fuck off (Score:3, Informative)

    by Frequency Domain ( 601421 ) on Sunday June 20, 2010 @08:52PM (#32636050)

    And what happens if someone is executed the day after the trial and exonerating evidence is found 10 years later?

    Do you know of a case where this has happened?

    http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/innocence-and-death-penalty [deathpenaltyinfo.org]

  • Re:For the record (Score:2, Informative)

    by dissy ( 172727 ) on Sunday June 20, 2010 @11:38PM (#32636896)

    There really isn't any pretty way to end a life but of the available methods that our technology allows I would argue that being shot is the most humane. If the shooters do their job right you will be dead in seconds.

    There was actually a 2008 Horizons documentary on this subject called "How to Kill a Human Being"
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1228865/ [imdb.com]

    It doesn't seem available on the BBC website, so here ya go (Warning, 50min video.. sorry bout that on a Sunday night folks!)
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8068091823725414405# [google.com]

    I won't spoil it, but after discovering basically every method of execution employed is or can be extremely agonizing, he finds a way to kill someone and they would be happy it was happening it was happening before nodding off asleep and having natural brain failure afterward.

    Enjoy

  • Re:whoopie (Score:4, Informative)

    by drkim ( 1559875 ) on Monday June 21, 2010 @02:33AM (#32637652)
    Yeah, if you actually read the bible, there are tons of prohibited activities that get you the death penalty (death by stoning). Some of these:

    If a married person has sex with someone else's husband or wife...

    If a married couple has intercourse during the woman's period...

    Being a fortune teller...

    Working on Saturday...

    ...so if you want to trot out the bible to defend your position, you better get ready for lots of capital punishment!
  • by Alex Belits ( 437 ) * on Monday June 21, 2010 @05:09AM (#32638378) Homepage

    I find it deeply disturbing that the implied statement is, execution somehow does not deny him the mercy of god, yet by murdering his victims he somehow denied those victims the same kind of mercy. Does it mean, god sends souls of murdered people to hell, for being permanendly marred by the murderer's sin?

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 21, 2010 @08:18AM (#32639242)

    The death penalty is a 100% deterrent to prevent Ronnie Lee Gardner from ever killing again. The same applies to Garry Gilmore, John Wayne Gacy, Ted Bundy and the small number of others. Realize that even though someone may be in legal custody that they often continue to commit crime. That's what happenend when Gardner committed his second murder - he was in custody. Ted Bundy escaped from jail and committed more murders. Crime in prison is significant. Even when someone is rotting in a maximum security prison there is still risk to medical personel and those that still have to work directly with the criminals.

    Yes, execution is a deterrent that prevents all future crimes.

  • Re:So ... (Score:1, Informative)

    by Shakrai ( 717556 ) * on Monday June 21, 2010 @08:26AM (#32639288) Journal

    Maybe if they interacted with their constituents more than a few hours each year there wouldn't be so much pent up anger. Besides, the videos that you saw weren't representative of all the town halls or even a majority of them. The media isn't going to air a video of a respectful conversation when they can air fireworks instead.

  • Re:So ... (Score:3, Informative)

    by AndersOSU ( 873247 ) on Monday June 21, 2010 @11:20AM (#32641566)

    The problem isn't with their constituents in general, it's with a very vocal minority that has decided that shouting down their representatives is more effective than dialog.

    I agree that politicians need to find more creative ways to interact with their constituents (i.e. not form letters, spam emails, and town halls), but there's no easy solution when you can't get a word in edgewise at any reasonably sized public event. Then again, no one promised that being a politician would be easy.

Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker

Working...