Utah State Prof Says Hybrids Don't Kill More Pedestrians 187
thecarchik writes "Preliminary data seemed to show that hybrids were more likely to be involved in pedestrian crashes or hit cyclists. But now EV enthusiast Mark Larson (he's also an Emeritus Professor of Spanish at Utah State University) has analyzed some additional data and found this not to be the case at all. He used 1994-2008 figures from the Fatality Reporting System maintained by the NHTSA and found that the rate of pedestrian fatalities has in fact fallen over that same period."
Well Fuck... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Emeritus Professor of Spanish? (Score:5, Funny)
I drive a hybrid, and I find I get just the right noise level by wedging a playing card between my tire and the wheel well.
This proves AQ are nice guys (Score:5, Funny)
Re:The study just involves blind people (Score:4, Funny)
"Hybrids don't kill more pedestrians..." (Score:2, Funny)
Re:The study just involves blind people (Score:5, Funny)
Indeed. I had to switch to a truck because I got tired of having to back over 'em as they crawled for help.
Re:The study just involves blind people (Score:5, Funny)
Hybrids were also twice as likely to have hit cyclists, at a rate of 0.6 percent versus 0.3 percent.
I think the evidence is clear on this one - the problem is that the hybrid drivers are green - green with envy that is. They are jealous the cyclists are even better for the environment than they are.
Re:I would say the problem is both (Score:3, Funny)
Constructor should simply add a noise to the vehicules, something akin to an ICE motor runing noise.
Oh its going to be far worse than that. Think ringtones - for your car.
The got it backwards... (Score:3, Funny)