Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Security Transportation Wireless Networking Technology

The Shoddy State of Automotive Wireless Security 260

angry tapir writes "Researchers from Rutgers University and University of South Carolina have found that wireless communications between new cars and their tires can be intercepted or even forged. While the potential for misuse may be minimal, this vulnerability points to a troubling lack of rigor with secure software development for new automobiles, said Wenyuan Xu, a computer science assistant professor at the University of South Carolina, who was a co-lead on the study. The researchers will present their findings at the Usenix Security Symposium, being held this week in Washington DC."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Shoddy State of Automotive Wireless Security

Comments Filter:
  • Sudo (Score:1, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @04:08AM (#33201224)

    break
    break!!!
    Oh... sudo break.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @04:16AM (#33201248)

    We currently show you driving 95 miles an hour with four flat tires. Would you like to be routed to a service station?

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @04:27AM (#33201284)

    Hell, your cell phone will give you up.

    At least Rick Astley won't give you up, nor will he let you down.

  • by Thanshin ( 1188877 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @05:02AM (#33201438)

    Ask me to design my ideal car and it'll have a lightweight but strong aluminium body, a simple, efficient diesel engine, comfortable seats and a decent stereo. Everything else is chaff, I don't even need ABS.

    I'd rather have airbags than a decent stereo.

    However, before even thinking about airbags, I'd really enjoy to have lights, windshield, mirrors, ...

    Brakes are nice too. unless you're planning to go slow enough to brake with your foot.

    Wheels are a nice feature too.

  • Re:Sudo (Score:4, Funny)

    by 16Chapel ( 998683 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @05:35AM (#33201554)
    I dunno about you, but I'd rather tell my wheels to brake.
  • by orange47 ( 1519059 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @05:37AM (#33201558)
    I mean, anyone can program them to go to 20000th floor and we could end up in orbit or something.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @06:38AM (#33201826)

    A good programmer will always guard against invalid input.
    http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/exploits_of_a_mom.png
    Suppose a spark plug wire was grounding out against the exhaust manifold and randomly sent out signals that could be interpreted as RFID data?

  • by The Mighty Buzzard ( 878441 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @06:40AM (#33201848)

    Ask me to design my ideal car and it'll have a lightweight but strong aluminium body, a simple, efficient diesel engine, comfortable seats and a decent stereo. Everything else is chaff, I don't even need ABS.

    I'd rather have airbags than a decent stereo.

    However, before even thinking about airbags, I'd really enjoy to have lights, windshield, mirrors, ...

    Brakes are nice too. unless you're planning to go slow enough to brake with your foot.

    Wheels are a nice feature too.

    Nah, they're just a fad.

  • "a complicated non-electronic system called 'THE DRIVER" would monitor the state of the car and act appropriately "

    Is that the system that is unable to differentiate between gas and breaks in a Toyota?

    In some cases, this non-electronic system called "THE DRIVER" is unable to distinguish between brakes and breaks.

  • by MiniMike ( 234881 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @09:08AM (#33203102)

    Brakes are nice too. unless you're planning to go slow enough to brake with your foot.

    His ideal car doesn't have a transmission or wheels, so unless he's on a steep enough hill that his lightweight but strong aluminum body can skid down it, he'll just be sitting in his driveway going 'vroom vroom' anyway. If his ideal house has a driveway, that is. As his ideal car also doesn't have a floor pan, he'll have no trouble using his feet to pretend to brake.

  • by cayenne8 ( 626475 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @09:30AM (#33203352) Homepage Journal
    "All of which are required by law, and would obviously be features. In all fairness, though, cars do need many of the sensors in order to keep the engine running at peak efficiency, thanks to fuel injection. And if you say you'd rather have carburettors anyway, you've clearly never owned a carburetted vehicle for any length of time. Ultimately, data is good, and more sensors means more data."

    I'm still with the GP on one thing...I just HATE ABS. I just never feel in control with those damned things...you slam them on when you absolutely have to, they start 'chattering', and won't stop you in time. If not for some good steering on my part, not to mention luck at the time with a place to go without hitting another car, those things would have cost me money in damages.

    I liked my old '86 911 Turbo. That thing would handle when you needed it, and no ABS (hell, no airbag either)....one time I had to slam the brakes on that thing at high speed, it locked up, slowed to where I had to be speed wise to make a manuver, and I could then steer and re-accelerate to get out of the situation. It worked. Of course, I have 4 bald spots...one on each tire which I'd locked it up, but that's the price you pay. I just bought new tires, and was on my way, no wreck, no body shop.

    Granted, this car was a special case, but in any car I've had, I just cannot get used to ABS. I feel they take too much control away from me.

  • by jimbolauski ( 882977 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @09:41AM (#33203500) Journal
    ABS is over-rated and will actually cause the car to stop slower, all it is good for is people that panic and stomp on their brakes which would put them in a spin otherwise.
  • by MachDelta ( 704883 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @12:08PM (#33205268)

    Any vehicle sold in the US after September 1, 2007 is supposed to have a TPMS (tire pressure monitoring system) as mandated by the TREAD act.

    Why? Because no one knows how to check the air pressure in their tires anymore.
    That and the whole Firestone fiasco.

UNIX is hot. It's more than hot. It's steaming. It's quicksilver lightning with a laserbeam kicker. -- Michael Jay Tucker

Working...