Legal Analysis of Oracle v. Google 206
Posted
by
timothy
from the not-to-be-confused-with-a-free-market dept.
from the not-to-be-confused-with-a-free-market dept.
snydeq writes "InfoWorld's Martin Heller provides an in-depth analysis of Oracle's legal argument against Google, a suit that includes seven alleged counts of software process patent infringement and one count of copyright infringement. 'Oracle's desired relief is drastic: not just permanent injunctions, but destruction of all copies that violate copyright (thus, wiping all Android devices), plus triple damages and legal costs. Also, it demands a jury trial,' Heller writes, and while this amounts mainly to saber-rattling, the Supreme Court's recent Bilski ruling did not completely invalidate software process patents despite their shaky ground due to prior art."
Re:This is in depth analysis? (Score:1, Funny)
8) I don't understand the difference between Sun and Google
Coffee maker patent (Score:5, Funny)
(Heck -- my coffee-maker probably violates them!)
Foiled by the old Java patent
Technical Analysis much simpler (Score:4, Funny)
Ahhhh shit! Time to learn another fucking language and 10 more over-engineered libraries! So much for time with the family.
Re:destruction of all copies that violate copyrigh (Score:1, Funny)
Someone plz call Rick Deckard...
Get rid of it (Score:2, Funny)
How can I vote this article down? It's so insipid and lacks anything new I wonder why it was approved in the first place.
Groklaw did publish something useful and interesting, this piece of opinion is nothing new.
Re:New slashdot logo for Oracle (Score:3, Funny)
hooker logo would be more appropriate, oracle invited everyone to bed then demanded pay after.