UK's Royal Mail Launches First Intelligent Stamps 69
Posted
by
Soulskill
from the stamplons-were-created-by-man dept.
from the stamplons-were-created-by-man dept.
An anonymous reader writes "The Royal Mail on Friday issued what it called the world's first 'intelligent stamps,' designed to interact with smartphones using image-recognition technology. The Royal Mail's latest special-issue stamps, devoted to historic British railways, are designed to launch specially developed online content when a user snaps them using an image-recognition application available on iPhone or Android handsets. 'This is the first time a national postal service has used this kind of technology on their stamps and we're very excited to be bringing intelligent stamps to the nation's post,' a Royal Mail spokesman said in a statement. 'Intelligent stamps mark the next step in the evolution of our stamps, bringing them firmly into the 21st century.'"
Barcodes (Score:5, Insightful)
2D barcodes designed to be read by a phone, largely for marketing purposes, have been in use in Japan since forever.
Also, this is pointless.
Intelligent stamp, or phone? (Score:5, Insightful)
Help (Score:3, Insightful)
There's an even higher tech kind of mail (Score:3, Insightful)
They have a kind now that you can send right from the iphone and it gets there instantly without a stamp or envelope, and it's free.
I think that's kind of more high-tech than a stamp you can take a picture of.
How much did this cost? (Score:2, Insightful)
Their job is to deliver mail. Once they get that right, and start booking profits and reinvesting that cash back into the network, then fine, let them make as many gimmicks as they like.
That time isn't now.
In the US... (Score:3, Insightful)
Physical stamps are still quite available, but the postal clerks use number-and-barcode labels, particularly for items with an unusual postage charge (if it's a standard letter [44c], for instance, they might just grab a 44c stamp from the drawer, but if it's something like $2.63, they'll print out a barcode label rather than dig for exactly $2.63 worth of stamps)
There's also click-and-ship (print shipping labels online), which essentially combines a computer-printed address label with barcode postage. [I like that because it saves the trouble of handwriting addresses and customs info, can be done from home at my convenience, and it's a few percent cheaper as well.]
Poor attempt to be cool with the 'new thing' (Score:4, Insightful)
So let me get this right...
1) Buy stamp with one of 6 pictures on it
2) Download App onto your phone using part of my monthly quota (and possibly have to pay for the App as well)
3) Using the App have it recognize one of 6 images (remember Google goggles can manage images of tons of things...)
4) Use the phone to download and read/listen to some web content using more of my quota on the tiny screen and low quality speaker
Seems complex and expensive when it could be
1) Put a short and easy to remember web address of the content on the bottom of the stamps and maybe some posters in the Post Office (the few that are left)
2) Type the address into my web browser on my PC with big screen, good speakers and unlimited use...
Or
1) Go to local library, borrow book for free with many poems including the one relating to the stamps on it and read while enjoying the sunshine...
Sometimes technology is not the answer you have been looking for
Cool but self-marginalizing. (Score:3, Insightful)
Okay, I like trains, and would probably check out the content the first time I got a letter with such a stamp on it... but the second time? No.
And who thought of the GREAT idea of linking postal stamps to online stuff? "Hey, old chap, let's do something that reminds our customers how little they actually need us!" :)
If the Royal Post delivered things in a timely manner, didn't randomly go on strike all the time, and had "tracking" that actually tracked beyond "...and then we gave the letter to another country's post, and we have no idea what happened next," it'd be a lot more useful.
Re:Stamps not so smart. (Score:3, Insightful)
I came here to say the same thing: The stamps are not smart any more than a barcode is smart or a book is smart or a painting is smart. “Smart” implies the ability to process information, not just the ability to store or convey information.
The phone that can snap the photo and recognize the stamp may, arguably, be called smart. The stamps are not smart.
You spelled 20th wrong (Score:3, Insightful)
I thought they were going to be RFIDs or something like that