Boeing Hummingbird Drone Crashes In Belize 68
garymortimer writes "Still not reported elsewhere, Flight International reports another crash of the Boeing Hummingbird helicopter UAV. The Hummingbird A160 is in development, but test flights already demonstrate successively greater endurance, higher altitudes, more extensive autonomy, and greater payload. The program has ambitious goals of a 2,500-mile (4,000 km) range, 24-hour endurance, and 30,000 ft (9,100 m) altitude. Flights are largely autonomous, with the aircraft making its own decisions about how to fly itself so as to meet certain objectives, rather than relying on real-time human control. Maximum speeds are over 140 knots. The aircraft is 35 ft (11 m) from nose to tail and has a rotor diameter of 36 ft (11 m).[2] Until recently it was powered by modified Subaru automotive engines, but newer versions fly with the Pratt & Whitney PW207D turboshaft."
Just ignore (Score:5, Insightful)
but test flights already demonstrate successively greater endurance, higher altitudes, more extensive autonomy, and greater payload.
Don't let the fact that it crashes bother you at all, this is the drone you want!
Always nice to see the war effort... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Why Belize? (Score:5, Insightful)
A great vacation spot for diving, but flight testing?
Most test flights work fine over a desert. Trying it in a jungle is much more elucidative.
Something bad happened (Score:3, Insightful)
Therefore we shouldn't develop this weapon any more. After all, one failure means the whole project will never produce a useful tool, ever.
Yet more copying-for-traffic BS sites (Score:5, Insightful)
Why don't the editors just link to the original source rather than sending bucketloads of traffic to these sites?
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/09/10/347201/a160-hummingbird-crashes-during-testing-in-belize.html [flightglobal.com]
Even contains MORE information like how it failed (in this case, something caused it to go into autorotation and basically didn't succeed with the landing).
Re:So let me understand (Score:3, Insightful)
"So if I am to understand correctly, these things are on full-time autopilot."
You understood wrongly.
Hey, but don't let that making you to read TFA.
"If it doesn't pick me up on radar or other sensors, BOOM?"
What do you think that happens if you are flying in a colliding trajectory to another human-piloted aircraft and no one of you pick the other on radar or other sensors? Yes: pilot eyes are sensors.