On the Web, Children Face Intensive Tracking 107
theodp writes "In the latest installment of their online privacy investigation, the Wall Street Journal reports that children face intensive tracking on the web, finding that popular children's websites install more tracking technologies on personal computers than do the top websites aimed at adults. In an analysis of 50 sites popular with US teens and children, the WSJ found that Google — whose execs recently lectured parents on online child safety — placed the most tracking files overall."
Re:I have no problem with sites using Cookies (Score:3, Informative)
Obligatory Firefox and plugins list (Score:5, Informative)
Perhaps as the WSJ continues its wrong-headed, sensationalistic and, indeed disingenuous* "What Do They Know" series they might just consider telling their frightened readers how to deal with this supposed danger.
But no, the only reference to browsing tools comes in the rather anemic comments section.
Note to WSJ: Next time you scream "won't they think of the kids..." please tell your readers to:
Use Firefox with the following plugins:
And use a host file with known tracking company addresses nulled
If my technophobic boss could do all this after one short training session, then WSJ readers can do it too.
*WSJ uses their own and outside scripting, places cookies and places partner tracking cookies, no? Also, if a reader has access behind the paywall, then the WSJ even knows the reader's credit card details.