Predicting Election Results With Google 205
destinyland writes "Google announced they've searched for clues about the upcoming US election using their internal tools (as well as its 'Insights for Search' tool, which compares search volume patterns for different regions and timeframes.) 'Looking at the most popular searches on Google News in October, the issues that stand out are the economy,' their official blog reported, adding, 'we continue to see many searches for terms like unemployment and foreclosures, as well as immigration and health care.' But one technology reporter also notes almost perfect correspondence between some candidate's predicted vote totals from FiveThirtyEight and their current search volume on Google, with only a small margin of error for other candidates. 'Oddly enough, the race with a clear link between web interest and expected voting is the unusual three-way contest [in Florida], where the breakdown between candidates should if anything be less clear-cut and predictable.' And Google adds that also they're seeing national interest in one California proposition — which would legalize marijuana."
Re:Prop 19 (Score:4, Informative)
It's explained in the summary...
If California maintains their legalization of marijuana, it likely will extend to other states in subsequent years.
It's not that I care from a personal standpoint. I don't smoke marijuana. I have no intention of smoking marijuana. From life experience, I see no reason that it shouldn't be legal. I also don't drink tequila. I have no intention to drink tequila. It's legal though. Would I suggest outlawing tequila because I won't drink it? No.
I did find it interesting that some alcohols [wikipedia.org] are illegal in California, that are available in a variety of other states. But unlike some other states, strong alcohols are sold in regular stores right along with beer and wine.
Re:Prop 19 (Score:2, Informative)
This is all an outright lie. It's not a jaillable offense, but it's still an offense that will cost you a ticket and the marijuana/paraphanalia you have confiscated. After, it will be legal unless an honest to god federal agent catches you.
Any adult can grow 25 square feet legally, so explain how that would mean it'll be restricted to a small number of growers.
Corporations are national entities. If they start trying to produce and sell pot then the federal government will have their ass.
Cities can regulate _recreational_, not medical, sales. Availability can only increase. They also can't stop people from having 25 sq foot gardens.
You, like so many opposed to this law, are completely full of shit. In all likelihood you're making a decent living off of medical marijuana and you just don't want to lose that even for the good of everyone else.
Re:Prop 19 could really use ... (Score:1, Informative)
Seat of the pants I have to agree with your driving study. Im more likely to drive under the speed limit rather then over it.
Re:Google and Prop 19 (Score:3, Informative)
Economics, you fail it.