US Robots Win Big Down Under 60
An anonymous reader writes "US teams dominated the MAGIC 2010 autonomous robotics competition, mapping and neutralizing simulated bombs at the 250,000 sq. meter Royal Showgrounds in Adelaide, Australia. Leading the pack with a team of fourteen robots was Team Michigan, principally from the University of Michigan, followed by the University of Pennsylvania, and RASR. This contest marks the beginning of practical robots that not only think for themselves, but also actively coordinate with a human commander."
Congratulations... (Score:5, Interesting)
Congrats to the teams that did well. I know a bunch of Australian teams that looked into entering and decided not to because:
a) It was an engineering challenge more than a research challenge,
b) It was closer to that ethical line of making killer robots than, say, the DARPA Grand Challenge autonomous vehicle competition,
c) There was an extremely compressed timeline to actually make anything, and
d) The prize is mostly prestige. i.e. It wouldn't come anywhere near the development costs even for the teams that won.
So, it was a less than perfect competition. But that also means that the teams that did well in it did well under difficult conditions, so good for them. :)
Kinect vs. $5k Hokuyo UTM-30LX Laser RangeFinder (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:I love robots (Score:4, Interesting)
I think robots are nice and have loads of practical uses, but honestly I'm just waiting for something like LCARS [memory-alpha.org] to be practical. Integrated compute control of all the major systems in the house, etc.
The only thing that never really made sense to me were typing things out. In Enterprise they had a keyboard of sorts but there weren't nearly enough keys to cover most of the major symbols.
I suppose I'm just in love with the general concept of it.
I just hope robots don't become cheap soldiers that any rich guy can own his personal army.
I imagine eventually the UN is going to draw a line between remote-controlled drones (UAVs like the Predator) and AI bots and forbid AI bots from being used, at the very least, in direct combat. Besides, there are a lot of issues at hand with bots; EMPS, for one. Robots won't be nearly as agile and fast as a human running for his life can be, so I imagine they would be far more vulnerable to specialized weaponry designed to counteract them (or hell, even conventional "big bang" weaponry like grenade launchers, rockets, missiles, etc.) Robots can be hacked and reprogrammed, soldiers cannot so easily. It would be a P.R. disaster if an Army Combat bot is seized by an enemy combatant with off-the-shelf gear and turned on its own soldiers.
I don't believe that robots will be practical enough (cost-wise) to be used as soldiers for at least 20-30 years (if we and/or the international community would even allow such a thing to happen).
Re:Kinect vs. $5k Hokuyo UTM-30LX Laser RangeFinde (Score:2, Interesting)
There is a large subset of the SLAM community devoted to this, Visual-SLAM; check it out.
Re:No wonder the US robots won (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Kinect vs. $5k Hokuyo UTM-30LX Laser RangeFinde (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Kinect vs. $5k Hokuyo UTM-30LX Laser RangeFinde (Score:3, Interesting)