Claims About China's April Internet Hijack Are Overblown 78
sturgeon writes "Yesterday, we discussed what most of the world's major media outlets were reporting on China's April 2010 hijack of '15% of Internet traffic,' including sensitive US government and defense sites. The alarm came following a US Government report (see page 244) on China / US economic and security relations released on Tuesday. Unfortunately, few bothered with fact checking or actually reading the report. The actual study never makes any estimate of Internet traffic diverted during the hijack — it only cites a blog post to suggest large volumes of traffic were involved. And curiously, the cited blog at the heart of the report never mentions traffic at all — only routes. You have to go to an interview with a third-party security researcher in a minor trade magazine to first come up with the 15% number (and this article never explains where the number came from). In a review of real data and actual facts, Arbor Nework's Craig Labovitz has a blog post looking at the traffic volumes involved in the incident (only a couple of Gigabits per second, or a 'statistically insignificant' percentage of Internet traffic)."
I for one ... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:heh (Score:5, Funny)
I certainly didn't. When I saw TFA was from "foxnews.com" I thought "This is going to be entirely reasonable and free of any fear-mongering."
Re:It's just a statistic (Score:3, Funny)
14% of all people know THAT!
Re:Only more Evidence (Score:3, Funny)