UK Police To Get Major New Powers To Seize Domains 161
Stoobalou writes "British Police forces could soon have the power to seize any domain associated with criminal activity, under new proposals published today by UK domain registrar Nominet. At present, Nominet has no clear legal obligation to ensure that .uk domains are not used for criminal activities. That situation may soon change, if proposals from the Serious and Organized Crime Agency (SOCA) are accepted."
Laughable (Score:5, Insightful)
Two weeks ago, Fitwatch, a site dedicated to campaigning against what it sees as heavy-handed practices by police surveillance units, was taken down by its UK-based web hosting company,
With its domain name suspended, the only way for visitors to find a rogue site would be to type in its lengthy (and decidedly less memorable) numeric IP address.
This shows how well prepared is the british police to deal with matters regarding the internet: I reckon they never heard of the hosts file or, for an URL only, favorites.
Such simple minds... life for them must be a permanent bliss.
Re:Just out of curiosity, (Score:2, Insightful)
Yes, because they will present links to content which are covered by copyright's, patent's and trademark's.
Police State (Score:3, Insightful)
Illegal - yes; irritant - no (Score:5, Insightful)
-- boggle! Of course there must be an appeals process.
The UK is becoming worse, there is a proposal by the home secretary to throw someone out of his house even if there was not enough evidence to charge [bbc.co.uk]; this is going to be abused by wifes who want a divorce -- get the bloke out on made up complaints of violence; by the time that he would be allowed back in she will have started the legal process and grabbed the property and stopped him seeing the kids.
Dear police, (Score:5, Insightful)
Dear Police,
Please be informed that not just one but multiple criminals use the domains Hotmail.co.uk and yahoo.co.uk. Please disable these immediately to prevent further crimes from occurring. (and they annoy the hell out of me).
Serious and Organized Crime? (Score:5, Insightful)
What do you want to bet that serious and well-planned out crimes won't include:
Goldman Sachs UK (where to start)
Paypal UK [paypal.co.uk] (seizure of users' money without refund)
Microsoft UK [microsoft.co.uk] (organized monopoly abuse)
Intel UK [intel.co.uk] (organized monopoly abuse)
and anyone else who's a paymaster?
Re:Laughable (Score:2, Insightful)
TFA - So your definition of a sophisticated mind does not encompass one that can deal with murdered children, mob control, terrorism or any other of the myriad issues a modern police officer has to deal with.. in your world if you are not IT savvy you are a "simpleton"? What an infantile, one dimensional little mind that you have. Grow up, fool.
There's a problem with the summary (Score:3, Insightful)
There, fixed for clarity and better understanding.
Re:A big deal (Score:5, Insightful)
I wouldn't necessarily call it free under those terms. If I can get in trouble for merely saying something, I don't think it's really free speech. Freer speech than in some areas, but not necessarily free at it's foundation.
Re:It has started already (Score:5, Insightful)
It's just like there's nothing wrong with police asking if they can look inside your house without a warrant. you just say no and they have to go get a warrant if they have good reason to need to search your house (unless of course there's evidence of a crime in progress)
Re:A big deal (Score:4, Insightful)
It is wrong. (Score:1, Insightful)
It is a misuse of power. Plain and simple.
Re:Laughable (Score:3, Insightful)
The coppers dealing with murdered children are not the same ones who are doing the mob control, and those of them who deal with internet are again different people with different specialisations.
So those who are actually responsible for the thing this discussion is about, should be IT savvy. If they are not, then they are simpletons indeed.
Re:It has started already (Score:2, Insightful)
There's nothing wrong with the police asking. It's the host's fault for caving in without a court order.
Sorry, but are you really that stupid? Of course there's also something wrong with the police asking! Yes, the hoster is to blame for caving in, but the police - the ones who actually made a demand that's decidedly unethical and quite possibly illegal, one that tramples the principles of free speech, freedom of opinion, and democracy and liberty - are blameless? They did nothing wrong?
Words fail me.
Re:A big deal (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Illegal - yes; irritant - no (Score:3, Insightful)
If there is real violence then it must be dealed with, what happens today is all too often one sided.