Wikipedia Pages Now On Amazon — With Product Links 130
An anonymous reader writes "Last month, e-commerce marketplace Amazon.com launched a relatively unnoticed new feature that brings content from Wikipedia pages to its own servers in a shadowy new project that appears to be called 'Shopping Enabled Wikipedia Pages.' Hosted on the Amazon.com domain, they replicate Wikipedia's content but have added links to where a book can be purchased on Amazon. Amazon representative Anya Waring told CNET when asked via e-mail, 'As of November, we have rolled out in the books category, however [it] will be expanding to new categories in 2011.' If Average Joe scrapes Wikipedia and adds affiliate links to it, Google will remove and punish the domains with duplicate pages."
very disappointing, but perhaps inevitable (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:very disappointing, but perhaps inevitable (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Loosey-goosey Creative Commons (Score:4, Insightful)
As a sometimes-wikipedia editor (aren't we all) I have to say "MEH".
I contribute to wikipeida because I want a useful reference. If Amazon is willing to mirror it (with a couple of ads) what is the problem?
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Loosey-goosey Creative Commons (Score:4, Insightful)
If I was working on a research grant, I couldn't touch wikipedia *anyway*. It *might* be an OK source for grade / high-school and *some* undergrad papers / projects, but NOT for research grants.
Wikipedia shouldn't be cited as a source at any level. But it can help you to understand a topic, and hopefully point you to some better sources if you need to cite something. There's no arbitrary limit at which you can't use it like that. Even when you're an expert in some field, you're still going to want information on related fields quite often.
Actually a good feature (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:very disappointing, but perhaps inevitable (Score:5, Insightful)
I find that attitude, which is prevalent in many fields, very troubling.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)