Today's WikiLeaks News 312
In today's episode of As WikiLeaks Turns we learn that WikiLeaks's main web site is back up less than 10 days after EveryDNS terminated the domain name over stability concerns. A 16-year-old Dutch boy suspected of being involved in the pro-WikiLeaks attacks on MasterCard and Visa has been arrested. But Dutch teenagers aren't the only Assange fans in the news. Many top journalists in Australia have sent a letter(PDF) to Prime Minister Julia Gillard today to express their support of WikiLeaks. The Sydney Police have written their own letter however to organizers of a pro-WikiLeaks rally saying that the police oppose a planned demonstration. Finally, special correspondent for The Times, Alexi Mostrous and freelance reporter Heather Brooke were given permission by the judge in the Julian Assange trial to post Twitter updates about the proceedings.
Can we get a category? (Score:1, Interesting)
Can we get a category for wikileaks news? Because I honestly do not care. And that's the point of Slashdot categories: seeing only what I want to see.
Over the last six months, every time something is posted on Wikileaks, there's a Slashdot article. Now they're coming multiple times a day.
Re:Can we get a category? (Score:5, Interesting)
This reminds me of one thing: Why are posts tagged? Can we include posts based on tags? Exclude posts based on tags?
I never actually realized why we have them, but posts keep getting tagged. *shrug*
If we can exclude posts on tags, I'm pretty sure filtering out everything "wikileaks" would work here.
Re:Bradley Manning (Score:2, Interesting)
If he's lucky, they'll give him time served for that, but it's likely to be a sliver of his sentence.
Security systems are built on trusting the people doing the work. What he did broke that trust, and it broke a law he was reminded of every time he entered a secured area. He was trained in how to deal with improperly classified information, and instead of doing that he tossed it over the wall to someone he didn't even know, and along with it tossed a pile of properly classified information.
People making a hero of him are ignorant of the law and naive about the need for security.
Re:Bradley Manning (Score:5, Interesting)
Security systems are built on trusting the people doing the work. What he did broke that trust, and it broke a law he was reminded of every time he entered a secured area. He was trained in how to deal with improperly classified information, and instead of doing that he tossed it over the wall to someone he didn't even know, and along with it tossed a pile of properly classified information.
From the linked article:
Re:Bradley Manning (Score:5, Interesting)
He's not being tortured. Nobody is any more.
You do realize that's what the USG claimed last time around, right? And then this organization named WikiLeaks documented that they were lying: [csmonitor.com]
Hopefully, if Manning is being tortured, someone on the staff there has at least a little human dignity and will let the world know. If it were you, I'm guessing you'd convince yourself that he deserved it every time you went to cash your paycheck. Because that's the type of human being you are.