Google TV Suffers Setback 202
An anonymous reader writes "Google TV has now been around long enough for the geeks to play around with it. And they have come back with disappointing reviews. While most were excited at the concept of wedlock between the TV and Internet, the marriage itself looks destined to be challenging."
Geeky devices (Score:5, Insightful)
Now I also just want devices that work great. I don't really have any desire to play around with them, apart from the occasional configuration to make things smoother for me. But there is a limit for that, and I'm not gonna spend hours and days coding something to accomplish it. This is also why general population will never turn to use Linux if something doesn't change, and can you really blame them?
Re:Geeky devices (Score:5, Insightful)
When all the major networks ban your TV product, it's pretty much destined to fail.
ps3, 360, etc (Score:5, Insightful)
the internet has made it to my tv, i get it through my ps3. why would i want another device that basically does the same thing but less of it?
Customers aren't ready yet (Score:4, Insightful)
TV is a passive medium for the vast majority of people and that's how they like it. Plop on the couch, select your channel and let somebody else make the decisions about what you'd like to watch. Most people don't have a home media server and don't understand why you'd want one (because nobody has explained that your DVD cupboard is basically a sneakernet server, and having everything you want to watch a button click away like music just hasn't happened yet).
Actually that's a good analogy - we have a home media server and various cobbled together clients around the house, and it's interesting to watch the usage patterns: Music videos get shuffled like a giant video ipod on the main TV, it's like the best MTV that never was with the bonus you can skip stuff you don't want to listen to. Kids want to watch 3 or 4 episodes of iCarly in a row. Parents want to be able to consume a serial like Dexter without the annoying "wait a week for the next episode" that broadcast TV forces on you.
Most people will want this stuff, they just haven't seen it - so do Google a favour and invite your non-tech-savvy friends to a demonstration of your media serving rigs (assuming you've gone to the trouble of making it demo friendly and can resist the urge to fiddle with technical stuff while you're showing them). What is going to be a killer is pricing - if Google could negoatiate to broadcast a channel of cheap stuff so the "plop on the couch and watch" crew could enjoy another TV channel without having to think too much, they may be tempted to purchase premium content like first run serials without the hassle of torrents.
Re:Geeky devices (Score:4, Insightful)
Nothing like the growth of apathy as a rationalization for closed, hacker-unfriendly systems!
Come off it and get out of the basement. On a population basis, the number of people interested in 'hacker friendly, open systems' is a rounding error. THERE IS NO MONEY IN IT. There IS money in simple. There is money in just works.
Re:Geeky devices (Score:4, Insightful)
> Apple TV selling a million times over the course of 4 months sounds very disappointing to me.
Really? What is your frame of reference for being disappointed?
I would doubt you would say the same thing if Tivo, Boxee, Roku or any other drv/media box company announced a similar number.
And I would be they would all be EXTREMELY pleased to have a number like that for that period of time.