Opera Supports Google Decision To Drop H.264 336
An anonymous reader follows up to yesterday's Google announcement that they would drop H.264 support from Chrome. "Thomas Ford, Senior Communications Manager, Opera, told Muktware, 'Actually, Opera has never supported H.264. We have always chosen to support open formats like Ogg Theora and WebM. In fact, Opera was the first company to propose the tag, and when we did, we did it with Ogg. Simply put, we welcome Google's decision to rely on open codecs for HTML5 video.'"
Re:Sad news for the web (Score:5, Insightful)
Every time this comes up the meme is that they're waiting for someone with deep pockets to sue. Well, Google has extremely deep pockets. If Google can use it with impunity without getting sued, you can be sure this is nothing but patent FUD. And if Google is sued, well at least there will be a real trial on the validity of the patents. Either way there's no reason for Opera or Mozilla or anyone else not to join in as long as Google leads the flock.
Re:Everyone else uses H264/MPEG4 (Score:5, Insightful)
How relevant will TV, radio, Blu-ray etc be in 2020? CD sales are already being replaced by digital downloads and while a lot of people continue to listen to the radio, they often do so by streaming it over the net. I see no reason why the future would be different for video.
Re:No news here. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Sad news for the web (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I wish.. (Score:1, Insightful)
Yea, its not like the money Mozilla makes from google and other advertising that they couldn't spend a little bit of that on a license for the codec or anything.
Don't confuse personal agenda and bullshit about why someone is/isn't doing something with reality.
H.264 is dirt cheap, they most certainly could work out a licensing deal to suit Mozilla.
There is no doubt in my mind that doing so would be about 6 billion orders of magnitude more productive than most of their other retarded projects. Tell the CEO of your fanboy club to cut his bonus this year and you'll pay for h.264 licensing for the next 20 years.
Re:I wish.. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Use what the standard is. Stop trying to usurp (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Everyone else uses H264/MPEG4 (Score:5, Insightful)
So is WebM, with the advantage that we wouldn't have to deal with shady licensing issues for the next 20 years.
H.264's only advantage is that it's the current state-of-the-art, and only a fool would believe that'd still be the case five years from now, let alone twenty.
Re:Everyone else uses H264/MPEG4 (Score:2, Insightful)