EC Tests Show Windows Vista Is Above Average — At Blocking Content 101
littlekorea writes "Microsoft's much-maligned Vista operating system has been named in the top three of 26 tools tested by the European Commission to filter out web content deemed inappropriate for children. The EC tests found that none of the 26 products enjoyed a 100 percent success rate, failing to block over one in five adult sites. It also found that few tools could overcome the workarounds available through cache or translation sites."
Whitelisting, not blacklisting damnit... (Score:5, Insightful)
OS for webfiltering? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Whitelisting, not blacklisting damnit... (Score:5, Insightful)
If you read the report on this page [lse.ac.uk] "Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. Full Findings" you'll see that some children were negatively affected by what they saw on the internet -- mostly ones that saw violent pornography.
I think there's little reason to block things if a teenager is actively searching for them, but there are good reasons to prevent a nine year old child seeing something unpleasant, for example children can have difficulty separating fantasy from reality. For the same reason, advertisers here aren't allowed to advertise a violent horror film during a programme children are likely to see.
The blocking software/services are managed by parents, and I don't see any difference in principle between blocking web content and hiding your 18+ films in the back of a cupboard.
Re:Whitelisting, not blacklisting damnit... (Score:4, Insightful)
Let him. Just use a Whitelisted system. There are Kids Browsers out there. If he wants a site in his browser, "he has to ask IT". That's the mentality we should promote, not "the net is too big and scary".
I'd rather a kid gets to do things without mommy and just know in the background that say when he turns 14 he can get "the adult internet".