Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Internet Networking

Last Available IPv4 Blocks Allocated 312

stoborrobots writes "Following on from APNIC's earlier assessment that they would need to request the last available /8 blocks, they have now been allocated 39/8 and 106/8, triggering ARIN's final distribution of blocks to the RIRs. According to the release, 'APNIC expects normal allocations to continue for a further three to six months.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Last Available IPv4 Blocks Allocated

Comments Filter:
  • by Spazmania ( 174582 ) on Monday January 31, 2011 @11:19PM (#35063596) Homepage

    triggering ARIN's final distribution of blocks to the RIRs

    I think you mean triggering IANA's final distribution. ARIN is one of the 5 RIRs who will receive a final /8 from IANA.

  • by sjames ( 1099 ) on Monday January 31, 2011 @11:37PM (#35063702) Homepage Journal

    Y2K was perfectly legitimate. It was only through heroic efforts that programmers were able to overcome years of managerial negligence and get the changes made in a knick of time. As is typical, since the herculean effort caused nothing to happen the world yawned and assumed the geeks were just moaning over nothing all along.

    In this case, it's not a flag day where what worked a second ago no longer does. It's more along the line of pain slowly creeping up on you day by day until one day you realize it's actually excruciating.

    It's been building for a few years, but few have seen the pain. In the '90s when you wanted a class C allocation, just ask and it was yours. Since then, the standards for justification have gotten tighter and tighter until you almost have to either exaggerate of consult a fortune teller to fill them out appropriately.

    It WILL get worse, and it will ramp up quickly, but it won't be like Y2K might have been.

    On a side note, a Y2K related issue (leap day implementing the 4 year and 100 year rule but not the 400 year rule) did result in a significant nuclear event at a Japanese fuel reprocessing facility.

  • by SheeEttin ( 899897 ) <sheeettin@nosPam.gmail.com> on Monday January 31, 2011 @11:38PM (#35063716) Homepage
    Not yet, Comcast is currently trialling IPv6 in select locations (i.e. San Francisco, NYC, Boston, etc.). They expect to roll out IPv6 to the rest of us some time this year. (You can keep up with their progress here [comcast6.net].)

    Meanwhile, if you really want IPv6 for whatever reason, I set up a tunnel with Hurricane Electric. After configuring my computers and router (DD-WRT, IPv6 is fully supported), I had IPv6 both internally and externally (i.e. IPv6 DHCP and access to the IPv6 Internet). You can set your own up here [tunnelbroker.net].
    (I took it down shortly afterward, because I don't know about any security ramifications this would have.)
  • Re:Who Cares? (Score:5, Informative)

    by sjames ( 1099 ) on Monday January 31, 2011 @11:50PM (#35063772) Homepage Journal

    How would I do that with you sitting in that backwater swamp of IPv4 with your fingers jammed in your ears prattling on about how you don't believe in that newfangled IPv6 thing and that it's probably the work of the devil?

  • by Cimexus ( 1355033 ) on Tuesday February 01, 2011 @12:24AM (#35063936)

    Some consumer routers have already supported it for some time: e.g. the Apple Airport Express, some NetComm routers, Fritz!Box (popular in Europe, mostly). For the rest, the firmware will be forthcoming, no doubt. My DSL modem/router manufacturer (Billion, http://www.billion.com/ [billion.com]) has already released firmware updates to some models to enable native dual stack. My particular model is due to be updated 'Q1 2011', so within the next two months. Which is great as my ISP already has native IPv6 available to its end customers now and a fully IPv6 backbone, so it should be a seamless transition.

    Having said that there are slack router manufacturers and crappy ISPs that have sat on their hands for too long and will now have to madly scramble. (Or implement carrier grade NAT which is an ugly kludge - I would immediately leave any such ISP that implemented it).

    There is one small problem however: some cheap/old routers don't physically have the onboard memory to fit a firmware containing both an IPv4 and IPv6 stack. So there will definitely be some users that need to physically replace their hardware, unfortunately.

  • Re:240/4 subnets (Score:4, Informative)

    by KiloByte ( 825081 ) on Tuesday February 01, 2011 @12:25AM (#35063946)

    Except that a good deal of devices refuse to route anything to such addresses, making them effectively useless. Having to reflash every router (including "consumer" ones) and fix every broken config would be harder than just migrating to IPv6. Strictly speaking, easier to amend but with breakages harder to spot.

  • Re:O M G (Score:5, Informative)

    by FoolishOwl ( 1698506 ) on Tuesday February 01, 2011 @04:12AM (#35065026) Journal

    If you read the headlines carefully, you'd have noticed a pattern:

    2001: IPv4 address space will run out in ten years.
    2002: IPv4 address space will run out in nine years. ...
    2010: IPv4 address space will run out next year.
    2011: Last Available IPv4 Blocks Assigned. IPv4 address space will run out later this year.

Arithmetic is being able to count up to twenty without taking off your shoes. -- Mickey Mouse

Working...