Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Military

USAF Gets F-35 Flight Simulator 252

cylonlover writes "Eglin Air Force Base has just taken delivery of a piece of hardware that would surely be the ultimate toy for flight sim gaming fans. The F-35 Lightning II Full Mission Simulator (FMS) system includes a high-fidelity 360-degree visual display system and a reconfigurable cockpit that can simulate all three variants of the F-35 Lightning II for US and international partner services – the conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) F-35A, the short takeoff and vertical landing (STOVL) F-35B, and the F-35C carrier variant."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

USAF Gets F-35 Flight Simulator

Comments Filter:
  • Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @03:33PM (#35884440)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Re:Top Gun (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Wyatt Earp ( 1029 ) on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @03:39PM (#35884510)

    Geography didn't favor the Empire of Japan vs the United States or Germany vs the United States.

    China and the US won't go to war over Taiwan in the near-term simply because China lacks the ability to invade Taiwan. Even with high profile programs like the new Chinese stealth fighter and a Chinese aircraft carrier, the People's Republic of China lacks the ability to project power across the Straights of Taiwan conventionally, they can point missiles at Taiwan and threaten them with nuclear weapons, but that's it. They can't invade because they don't have troop transport capability.

    While China has nukes that can reach the United States, in a nuclear exchange between the PRC and US, the PRC can't destroy the US, the US certainly has the nuclear arsenal to destroy the PRC as a nation-state.

    Right now and for the near to mid-term, the only nation that has nuclear parity with the US is the Russian Federation.

  • by kevinNCSU ( 1531307 ) on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @03:49PM (#35884626)
    Not that I think the F-35 is a good decision, but the ability of the United States to project power has been based on their military technology (especially air-force) having a FAR better then "even match" ratio.
  • Re:Ugh the F-35... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Richard_at_work ( 517087 ) on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @03:51PM (#35884634)
    The F-35 was supposed to be the replacement aircraft for the F/A-18, AV-8B Harrier and the F-16 - basically the mid-range strike fighter aircraft for the next 35 years for the USAF, USMC and the USN. It was also supposed to be a comparable replacement cost wise, with a lower cost per unit than the F-22 Raptor and lower maintenance than any of the aircraft it was replacing.

    The problem is, today its over budget, late and is still suffering from drastic design and development problems - the VSTOL variant is almost dead in the water, with the word around the industry that Lockheed needs to do a radical redesign of both the airframe and the lift system for the F-35B, with the result that the USMC has switched part of its order to the carrier borne variant instead.

    The lower maintenance cost requirement is going to be missed horrifically as well, with current estimates putting the aircraft to be more than 35% more expensive to maintain during its life than any of the aircraft it will be replacing.

    With over 1,600 airframes intended to be sold during its life, it was supposed to be the cheap next generation aircraft that would become the mainstay of the US air capability for the next quarter of a century, but instead its turned into a seriously overpriced, under performing white elephant.

    The F-35 was supposed to be second in the air only next to the F-22, it was supposed to be able to fight its way into a first world air defence zone, strike a ground target, and deal with any air threat whilst doing so - it was supposed to best anything the Russians or the Chinese could put in the sky.

    Currently, its just a big waste of time and money.
  • by Dishevel ( 1105119 ) on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @04:21PM (#35884948)

    You 02c has been determined to be worthless.
    Second sentence.

    Wonderful, especially while the reps are trying to cripple aid to the poor and handicapped.

    Anyone who believes that the Republicans are Worse than the Democrats or the other way around has no opinion of merit.
    Neither gives a shit about you. They both only want more power for the government.
    They only differ in what they tell you is the reason for grabbing more power.

  • by Cyberax ( 705495 ) on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @05:03PM (#35885320)

    Your knowledge of history is abysmal.

    First, USSR proposed creation of anti-Hitler coalition in 1938 and actually was ready to move against Germany.

    And yes, you read it correctly - in 1938. England basically said: "Fuck you, USSR! Hitler is a pig and a nationalist, but he's a CAPITALISTIC pig and a nationalist. So go rot in hell." ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_Agreement [wikipedia.org] ).

    The USSR parsed this reply correctly as: "You're on your own" and decided to make the best of the situation by securing access to Leningrad (Winter War), annexing some former provinces of the Russian Empire and stalling for time (Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact). And after the WWII began it became inevitable that USSR would have to intervene at some point.

    Hitler then badly underestimated the Soviet army (which he called the "Colossus with feet of clay") partly because of the disastrous (for the USSR) Winter War. And that was what has caused the downfall of Nazi Germany. The USSR army was the main reason behind the Hitler's defeat.

  • by Cyberax ( 705495 ) on Wednesday April 20, 2011 @06:31PM (#35885932)

    "First: Russia would have never held Moscow without massive western aid."

    WTF?!?!?! Lend-lease help has just started coming in significant quantities by the time the Battle of Moscow was winding down (the First Protocol has been signed on the day of the German's offensive operation). Also, the total amount of lend-lease shipments was completely dwarfed by the native USSR production.

    "Second: Nazi Germany was, in name and actions, a socialist state."

    Dude, read about fascism. That's definitely NOT a socialistic state, it's an uber-capitalistic one. That's why Hitler loathed USSR.

    "Third: Russia's army had been decapitated by Stalin's paranoid purges prior to WWII. They started the war dis-functional."

    That is also not true. While Stalin did purge a lot of capable officers, the Red Army was far from being "decapitated".

Math is like love -- a simple idea but it can get complicated. -- R. Drabek

Working...