Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Software Technology

Why Software Is Eating the World 192

An anonymous reader writes "Web browser pioneer Marc Andreessen writes in the Wall Street Journal that software is 'eating the world.' He argues that software's importance to the economy is being underestimated, and will become much more evident in the near future. Quoting: 'But too much of the debate is still around financial valuation, as opposed to the underlying intrinsic value of the best of Silicon Valley's new companies. My own theory is that we are in the middle of a dramatic and broad technological and economic shift in which software companies are poised to take over large swathes of the economy. More and more major businesses and industries are being run on software and delivered as online services—from movies to agriculture to national defense. Many of the winners are Silicon Valley-style entrepreneurial technology companies that are invading and overturning established industry structures. Over the next 10 years, I expect many more industries to be disrupted by software, with new world-beating Silicon Valley companies doing the disruption in more cases than not.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Why Software Is Eating the World

Comments Filter:
  • by garyebickford ( 222422 ) <`gar37bic' `at' `gmail.com'> on Saturday August 20, 2011 @01:07PM (#37154640)

    I have been in two recruiting situations in which the fact that the company's software developers were unionized was a major factor in my decision not to go there. If nothing else, my own observations have shown that if a company's policies are so screwed up that the workers feel the need for a union I don't want to work there; and also that in some cases (for some particularly in the northeast US) many unions seem to still have a greedy, self-destructive attitude that continues to drive entire industries out of business, and throw artificial barriers between (for example) firefighters and police against the people, making it difficult for individual members to maintain a constructive relationship with their populace - their ultimate employers.

    Having said that, I am aware that in some industries unions have a valuable role. I grew up in the construction business, and for certain trades the union hiring halls act in a sense as brokers for their members, and provide somewhat of a guarantee that their tradesmen are competent. And back in the 1980s (IIRC) in Portland OR the metal fabricating companies and the metal workers unions became concerned that the schools were no longer producing potential apprentices, and worked together to build an associate degree program in metal working. I'm not a musician, but from my limited long-ago experience, there are similar benefits with the musicians' union.

    I've suggested privately that one possibly beneficial union role would be as the representative and hiring agency for Central and South American nationals coming over the border to work in low-level jobs in the US - much like the construction trades unions. The union could maintain responsibility for the individuals, protection of them against unfair practices, and assisting in handling their legal and financial relations. I haven't thought this through thoroughly but it seems like it might help.

  • by cartman ( 18204 ) on Saturday August 20, 2011 @08:18PM (#37157560)

    I see I've been modded down to "troll" by pointing out something which nobody could seriously dispute.

    Such as how little they are willing to work for. Just recently I read a comment here on slashdot from some developer who said his whole team had been working 12-16 hour days for a year and a half with no extra pay...

    That's just ridiculous and silly.

    It's extremely easy to find a job as a programmer right now which pays highish wages relative to other jobs, and which doesn't require working 12-16 hour days. Although there is significant unemployment right now, that unemployment is almost entirely among the working class, and among people who used to be employed in construction etc, and among millenials. The unemployment rate among experienced programmers is 4% at present, meaning unemployment in that sector is almost entirely frictional. At my company, for example, we're trying to find qualified people to hire, but it's virtually impossible. In other words, the labor market for programmers is as tight as it's ever been, with the possible exception of the 1999-2000 timeframe.

    Whoever is working 12-16 hour days for no additional money, for a year and a half, has made a silly choice, and has done himself harm for no reason whatsoever. He has many other easy alternatives, which he chose not to investigate or pursue.

    Of course, there are many people in this economy who lack skills or experience, and who are seriously suffering. But here we're getting complaints from programmers who have careers in a field with 4% unemployment.

    One needs only to type "software engineer pay" into google and come up with links like this one [payscale.com] which clearly indicate that someone with a Bachelor's degree makes $60k-$120k per year (not including benefits), Or I could type "unemployment sector" and find [thenextweb.com] that the unemployment rate for programmers is half the national average and that: "With an unemployment rate of under 4% in the tech sector, there’s a shortage of qualified technology professionals, TechFlash reports." Or I could type into google a query about how many hours most programmers work, and find from the Bureau of Labor Statistics that: "Most software engineers and programmers work 40 hours a week, but about 15 percent of software engineers and 11 percent of programmers worked more than 50 hours a week in 2008" which obviously means that working 12-16 hour days is rare. All this took about 60 seconds of research, but perhaps the people working 12-16 hour days never bothered to type these things into google?

    Part of living in a capitalist economy involves looking at the options available to you and selecting the best one given your circumstances. I know there is always some rare person who says something like: "I paid $45,000 for a $25,000 car, because I didn't even bother to walk across the street to some other dealership to look," but it's rare and signifies nothing other than that some lone person got ripped off.

    The odd thing is that there's constant complaining on slashdot among people, who are essentially highly privileged or fortunate workers. Programmers make $60-$120k for a Bachelor's degree and work 40 hours per week (which apparently is average, according to the BLS) with an unemployment rate of 4%. Clearly programmers are in the top 1% of workers worldwide, by a very comfortable margin, and are within the top 10% even among the rich countries. Nevertheless, they constantly insist on slashdot that they deserve much more than this and that they're the modern equivalent of slaves, that laws should be passed favoring them even more and that they should form unions etc.

    I realize this will be modded down to "troll". Of course, there are a few modders here (not most of them, of course) who think that anything which challenges any idea they have in their heads is a troll. Ohwell...

The one day you'd sell your soul for something, souls are a glut.

Working...