Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Transportation Power Technology

The Quest For an EV Fast-Charge Standard 248

An anonymous reader writes "This article explores one of the stumbling blocks currently facing EV adoption: 'Sure, there are already public charging stations in service, and new ones are coming online daily. But those typically take several hours to fully replenish a battery. As a result, the ability for quick battery boosts — using a compatible direct current fast charger, the Leaf can refill to 80 percent capacity in 30 minutes — could potentially become an important point of differentiation among electric models. But the availability of fast charging points has in part been held up by the lack of an agreement among automakers on a universal method for fast charging — or even on a single electrical connector.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Quest For an EV Fast-Charge Standard

Comments Filter:
  • My solution (Score:3, Insightful)

    by GoodNewsJimDotCom ( 2244874 ) on Monday August 29, 2011 @09:39AM (#37240810)
    I think some of the battery arrays should be able to pulled out of the car and swapped in with a charged battery array. This process could happen in under a minute.
  • Just like laptops! (Score:1, Insightful)

    by OITLinebacker ( 1799770 ) on Monday August 29, 2011 @09:46AM (#37240870)
    You can't even get a single laptop maker to standardize within the models they currently offer. I find it difficult to believe that an industry that can't even standardize on the tires to agree on their connectors. It's a wonder they even all agreed to use Gasoline (and even then you have models that "prefer" specific octane).
  • Re:My solution (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Cryacin ( 657549 ) on Monday August 29, 2011 @09:49AM (#37240896)
    I don't think they would sell it like that. You probably would purchase a "licence" for a battery, basically, the right to a working one for the pool, pay for the charged swapover, and have failure replacements calculated into the swapover expense. The concept of "new" and "old" battery wouldn't really come into it.
  • by fuzzyfuzzyfungus ( 1223518 ) on Monday August 29, 2011 @09:51AM (#37240904) Journal
    Battery technology certainly is evolving; but the "put power in" part is a fairly reasonable place to put a nice abstracted interface.
  • Re:My solution (Score:5, Insightful)

    by lucidlyTwisted ( 2371896 ) on Monday August 29, 2011 @09:56AM (#37240968)

    I might be a little picky about swapping my brand new cells with an unknown station's current cell stock.

    Treat them like gas canisters then. The canister remains the property of the company and all you do it buy the contents. The company is responsible for ensuring the canister is functional, safe etc. If the battery develops a fault - you can simply swap it free of charge for a new one. Obviously you are paying for this in part of the fee when you pick up a fresh battery, but it saves having to horde your own precious batteries.
    To be honest I am surprised that the industry didn't do this from the get go since such schemes (as mentioned above) already exist all over the globe for many things. All there needs to be are a few agreed standards on size etc. Again, just like gas canisters really.
    If one company makes a better battery that can fit into the same volume, then they can compete. heck, such standardisation could stimulate a new battery market.

  • Re:My solution (Score:5, Insightful)

    by chill ( 34294 ) on Monday August 29, 2011 @10:16AM (#37241152) Journal

    The same way that is stopped now with every other item you purchase. By complaining to the store and authorities, and by suing them if necessary. At the very least, stop going there and tell everyone you can.

    Fraud is a crime.

Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers. -- Leonard Brandwein

Working...